blackbird03

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Apr 20, 2002
165
1
Visit site
Status (Visible)
Hi,

for those of you that took EK 2D. How did it compare to the real thing? Did you guys think that PS was a lot harder?
 
T

TheRock

I took this about a week ago, though I'm not taking the mcat til next april... but I thought the test was on par with aamc material, but I've only seen tests 1-3 of aamc.
 

blackbird03

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Apr 20, 2002
165
1
Visit site
Status (Visible)
Wasn't Bio very tough? How about PS, i thought the section was hard but the scale generous, overall it was a little trickier than AAMC tests, no? Verbal was right on par with AAMC tests I thought. Good luck everyone!
 

Biffer

The good times doc
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Dec 21, 2001
328
0
philly
Visit site
Status (Visible)
I thought EK2 PS was tough--far enough from the level of AAMC that I'm not worried about my sub-par results.

-biffer
 
This thread is more than 18 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.
About the Ads