Got a question from a student and wanted to poll the crowd:
When categorizing things on ERAS, do blog posts accepted to FOAMed websites such as ALiEM count as "peer reviewed online publications" or should they be "non-peer reviewed online publications?"
If the content was reviewed by the EM PD and the chair, with feedback given and changes made accordingly, and then ALiEM approved a final version for posting, does that count as being peer reviewed?
Does it make a difference if the post is submitted by a medical student versus a resident? Like a resident appling for fellowship or reapplying to change specialties?
Here's an example of the type of content we're talking about, though this looks like it was written by faculty:
Top 10 Reasons NOT to Order a CT Pan Scan in a Stable Blunt Trauma Patient
My stance is that a website not owned or operated by any of the authors decided it was worth hosting, meaning they reviewed it, so it should count as peer reviewed - and EM is a pretty laid-back and pro-FOAMed field. At the same time, I recognize that this is a pretty weak form of medical literature when compared to, say, Annals.