owenmichael said:
I think that match list and board scores are the most concrete way to compare success after medical school. Georgetown places a ridiculous number of students into top 50 hospitals and tough specialties. Emory's is good, but clearly not as great a Georgetown.
So what's Georgetown's average board score then? Oh, "consistently above average" or "well above average"? Every fricking school in the country says this and it's meaningless.
Match lists are even worse. Not only are they completely dependant on the interests of the class, geography and other irrelevant factors, but we don't even know how to evaluate them, let alone compile them all together and evaluate which school is better. Quick, who's better in ophtho, Bascom Palmer or MGH?
Residency director ratings are not ideal, but they are far better than the alternative at evaluating the only thing that counts ... what residency directors think of the school. No objective metric (funding, avg GPA, avg MCAT, avg residency director rating, avg peer rating, etc) puts Georgetown on the same level as Emory, let alone above it.
And for the record I'm not an Emory troll either, I'm probably going to decline to go there. I just hate when people say "look at their match list!".
😛