- Joined
- Jun 27, 2016
- Messages
- 53
- Reaction score
- 11
Has anybody used the new Examkrackers 101 biological molecules passages or the physics passages? I checked on amazon, but their isn't any reviews yet.
Ek has two 101 biology passages books. One is called molecules which is on biochemistry (enzymes, biomolecules, metabolism, lab techniques) and genetics. I have done 19 passages from it and I think it's excellent practice. I have bought the biology 2 book on physiology, but haven't opened it yetThat covers bio + biochem, but not ochem. If I remember correctly, molecule I is more based on biochem and molecule II is more for biology.
Ek has two 101 biology passages books. One is called molecules which is on biochemistry (enzymes, biomolecules, metabolism, lab techniques) and genetics. I have done 19 passages from it and I think it's excellent practice. I have bought the biology 2 book on physiology, but haven't opened it yet
good question. So in their content review book for biochem (called biology 1 molecules) they have 4 sections. 1 is biological molecules and enzymes, 2 is genetics, 3 is metabolism, and 4 is laboratory techniques. The passages are in the same order. Its broken up into the same sections as the content review book, although there may be some overlap. So each of the 4 sections has 2 Full length section tests, meaning 2 tests composed of 10 passages with 59 questions and some standalones mixed in. Each section has an additional mini test w/5 passages. 2 full tests composed of 10 passages for each section (2*10*4) =80, plus (1*5*4)=20 for the mini tests, giving 100 total (plus 1 as a warm up) to equal 101. So each section has 25 passages. The biology 2 book has 6 chapters to cover, so each chapter has 16-17 passages instead of 25. Right now i do about 2-3 passages a day, depending on how busy I am I sometimes do more or less.
I'm using their new 101 passages for biology(systems) and biochemistry (molecules). I've only done passages from molecules thus far, but they're excellent. Most passages are experimentally based with graphs and require critical thinking/scientific reasoning, which is what the new test is all about according to this forum.would you recommend the series? are you using the new ones?
I understand and agree 100% with you on EK's trickiness tendency. I haven't used any AAMC materials yet, so its hard to compare to the real thing, but EK's questions are not very straightforward.They are tricky!! so tricky! i am taking a EK course and on the 30minute exams I am getting 60-70% as well, usually because I am not paying attention to detail.
I have EK101 biochemistry later on I will buy EK101 bio 2 and CARS. EK 's strategy is based on careful analysis and attention to detail.
Hey I'm interested in your book! Please PM me.I'm selling mine if anyone is interested
I struggled with EK's 30-min exams when I studied last year. Barely pass the 50% mark. The passages were ok but the I felt I spent more time reading the questionsThey are tricky!! so tricky! i am taking a EK course and on the 30minute exams I am getting 60-70% as well, usually because I am not paying attention to detail.
I have EK101 biochemistry later on I will buy EK101 bio 2 and CARS. EK 's strategy is based on careful analysis and attention to detail.
Can anyone compare the EK 101 series to the 1001 stand-alone question books? I always get confused between the two. I don't have any of the books, would like to know if any of these books are worthy to invest time in, and which subjects.
What's the SB?Very tricky and heavy experiment based questions. Almost harder than the SB in my opinion.
what about the EK 101 biochem passages makes you say they're harder than real test and/or the section bank?I definitely wanna hear from those who used this and took the exam and what they think about it. I'm learning alot from them, they're difficult, but I actually like them. But when I took the MCAT last year, I barely had passages like that. Some was SB style but was not to this extent....
what about the EK 101 biochem passages makes you say they're harder than real test and/or the section bank?
So by doing the EK questions, you'll be over prepared? especially if EK is longer that is a good thing right?Oh, and AAMC passages are way shorter than EK.
So by doing the EK questions, you'll be over prepared? especially if EK is longer that is a good thing right?
hahaha, hopefully!
I have to say, overall, EK does a really close job to AAMC, coming in second is NS, Kaplan and TPR. I've dipped into all of them mainly their FL and content stuff, not the actual course. I can't speak about TBR because I only have their pre-2015 materials.
What I have to say though is that after doing so many EK passages from their 101 books, I'm not so intimidated when faced with those intense molecular / pathway / gene type of passage and questions.