Iāve been hearing from more and more students who felt completely thrown off by how different the real DAT was compared to their practice with Bootcamp and Booster.
For a lot of people, the QR and Bio sections in particular felt either way harder or just... different. One student told me:
Another said:
We've worked with students for over 20 years and try to prepare them with realistic, high-difficulty problems that actually reflect the kind of thinking the real exam requires.
š„ As a thank-you to the SDN community, we're offering 15% off all of our materials.
Use discount code TAKE15 at Orgoman.com
Has anyone else here noticed this gap between practice tests and the real DAT? Would love to hear what others experienced.
For a lot of people, the QR and Bio sections in particular felt either way harder or just... different. One student told me:
āBootcamp made me feel confidentā¦ maybe too confident. I wasnāt prepared for how fast and weird the real test felt.ā
Another said:
āDestroyer QR was brutal, but after that, the real DAT math felt easier. I wouldnāt have passed without it.ā
We've worked with students for over 20 years and try to prepare them with realistic, high-difficulty problems that actually reflect the kind of thinking the real exam requires.
š„ As a thank-you to the SDN community, we're offering 15% off all of our materials.
Use discount code TAKE15 at Orgoman.com
Has anyone else here noticed this gap between practice tests and the real DAT? Would love to hear what others experienced.
Last edited:
