For those who don't have any interviews yet

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Date verified: 6/16
sGPA/cGPA: 3.4/3.7
MCAT: 27Q

I wasn't complete at most of my schools until late September/early October due to waiting for my second set of MCAT scores.

My MCAT is what's killing me. 🙁
 
verified mid july
gpa- 3.9
mcat- 33
 
just got my first invite today from ohio state. 3.45/3.3 34. complete 3rd week september... Also, i live in ohio but i know a lady on admissions at University of Toledo and talked to her yesterday. She said their office is just swamped right now getting through the first round acceptances, and that they have received a ton of applications in the past two months. So my guess is that for many schools they will be sorting it out maybe by christmas. I hope. This process sucks...
 
😕 And you have 0 interviews? I find this surprising, considering your GPA makes mine cry.

Yea its a shame but I guess I didn't tell the whole story. My ECs completely suck.
 
Yea its a shame but I guess I didn't tell the whole story. My ECs completely suck.

it might also be because your writing score was somewhere between H to the izzO

sorry, couldn't help it. you'll def get in somewhere though the application cycle is slow. i wanted to make more jayz jokes but what more can i say
 
To those who find this thread relevant, what do you guys plan on doing about the situation? Would it be reasonable to email schools about your concerns?
 
Yea its a shame but I guess I didn't tell the whole story. My ECs completely suck.

Still doesn't make sense. The interviews are pretty much based off your gpa/mcat....what they'll do is take your gpa and multiply it by your mcat score to calculate a composite score. It's that number that gets compared with other applicants and will get you your interview invites (varies with schools). They'll let you explain in your interview why your EC's suck, but that's not what prevents you from getting an interview invite.

Are you a reapplicant? Have you taken other mcats and scored lower? Did you score an 11 in each section but a 3 in the verbal?
 
Still doesn't make sense. The interviews are pretty much based off your gpa/mcat....what they'll do is take your gpa and multiply it by your mcat score to calculate a composite score. It's that number that gets compared with other applicants and will get you your interview invites (varies with schools). They'll let you explain in your interview why your EC's suck, but that's not what prevents you from getting an interview invite.

Are you a reapplicant? Have you taken other mcats and scored lower? Did you score an 11 in each section but a 3 in the verbal?

This does not sound right to me. I know Initial screening (if the school has one) is mostly based on numbers. But once you submit the secondary, I think everything (i.e. ECs, LORs, etc) get looked at before an interview invitation. Again, this may vary slightly between schools, but my understanding is that great numbers does not guarantee and interview, a balanced application does.
 
it might also be because your writing score was somewhere between H to the izzO

sorry, couldn't help it. you'll def get in somewhere though the application cycle is slow. i wanted to make more jayz jokes but what more can i say

Hahaha I love the Jay-Z jokes. Since everyone has been asking allow me to reintroduce myself. I am not a reapplicant, this was my first and only mcat, i didnt score 11 in each section but all sections were greater than 10. I did get an M on the writing section. I applied to about 20 schools. As far as my ECs go I did about 3 months of research (just did lab work for an MD, I didnt have my own project or anything), volunteered at the hospital for about 50 hours, and shadowed 2 physicians for about 50 hours. All in all I feel that I did all the required ECs but none of them were long term. Also I lack any significant leadership experiences. My personal statement could have been better also. I really want to go to medical school next year so I am in the middle of filling out AACOMAS right now, maybe ill have better luck with DO schools. To all the future applicants out there please work hard on ECs and don't take them for granted. Don't be like me I was only able to fill out 5 of the 14 spaces for ECs on AMCAS. Everyone during my whole college career told me that a good GPA and MCAT guarantees an acceptance. I think my application proves that there is a lot more to it.
 
Last edited:
This does not sound right to me. I know Initial screening (if the school has one) is mostly based on numbers. But once you submit the secondary, I think everything (i.e. ECs, LORs, etc) get looked at before an interview invitation. Again, this may vary slightly between schools, but my understanding is that great numbers does not guarantee and interview, a balanced application does.


amine is right.
interviews are based off much much more than just GPA/MCAT.
 
High GPA and MCAT are a big plus in the process but not everything. From what I understand, most schools have an initial screen where they look at GPA and MCAT. Most schools (probably all of them) have some minimum GPA and MCAT cutoff and if you fall below this they basically automatically reject you. If you make it past this screen the adcom will start looking over your app to see if you are going to get an interview or not. This is where ECs come into play. So, a high GPA and MCAT only guarantee your app will actually be read by a human.

If you hang out on these boards long enough you'll see many who claim to have phenomenal GPA and MCAT and get pre-interview rejections.

By the way, if you have a crummy MCAT don't bother applying to Michigan or Case. They rejected me within mere days of my app becoming complete. I am certain they have an MCAT cutoff which got me the quick axe. 🙁

PS It's in my MDapps profile but I applied to 31 schools. There should be some kind of award for finishing all those secondaries!
 
Just got my first but I'll post since I was in this boat for 3+ months (rejected from 5-7 schools already)

Verified 8/11 applied to 20+ schools.
3.64
35
 
Hahaha I love the Jay-Z jokes. Since everyone has been asking allow me to reintroduce myself. I am not a reapplicant, this was my first and only mcat, i didnt score 11 in each section but all sections were greater than 10. I did get an M on the writing section. I applied to about 20 schools. As far as my ECs go I did about 3 months of research (just did lab work for an MD, I didnt have my own project or anything), volunteered at the hospital for about 50 hours, and shadowed 2 physicians for about 50 hours. All in all I feel that I did all the required ECs but none of them were long term. Also I lack any significant leadership experiences. My personal statement could have been better also. I really want to go to medical school next year so I am in the middle of filling out AACOMAS right now, maybe ill have better luck with DO schools. To all the future applicants out there please work hard on ECs and don't take them for granted. Don't be like me I was only able to fill out 5 of the 14 spaces for ECs on AMCAS. Everyone during my whole college career told me that a good GPA and MCAT guarantees an acceptance. I think my application proves that there is a lot more to it.

😕😕😕

I know people with much lower stats and the exact same EC's who got in. I don't get it..you should be getting invites. This doesn't make sense 🙁 I'm sorry dude.

While your EC"s are low...avg shadowing is like 75 hrs, and volunteering is like 125-150 hrs at least I think.

With your stats I REALLY doubt they would be like "OMG only 50 hours!" Let's be honest, those numbers more than prove you have what it takes to be a doc. I'll be rooting for you man
 
This does not sound right to me. I know Initial screening (if the school has one) is mostly based on numbers. But once you submit the secondary, I think everything (i.e. ECs, LORs, etc) get looked at before an interview invitation. Again, this may vary slightly between schools, but my understanding is that great numbers does not guarantee and interview, a balanced application does.

The decision to invite someone for an interview is based off of a composite score (mentioned before). Once the interview takes place another score (an interview grade) is assigned to the student, and then the entire application gets scrutinized alongside the others who interviewed as well. Yes, there are other factors such as URM or disadvantaged....

Edit: Whenever a school is dealing with +3,000 applications there is simply no time to go through each one and look at every transcript and read every personal essay. They create a cutoff point using the composite score to determine who to invite for an interview, and then their applications are pored over.
 
The decision to invite someone for an interview is based off of a composite score (mentioned before). Once the interview takes place another score (an interview grade) is assigned to the student, and then the entire application gets scrutinized alongside the others who interviewed as well. Yes, there are other factors such as URM or disadvantaged....

Edit: Whenever a school is dealing with +3,000 applications there is simply no time to go through each one and look at every transcript and read every personal essay. They create a cutoff point using the composite score to determine who to invite for an interview, and then their applications are pored over.

How does this explain the fact that there are always cases of applicants with low stats getting acceptances?
 
Still doesn't make sense. The interviews are pretty much based off your gpa/mcat....what they'll do is take your gpa and multiply it by your mcat score to calculate a composite score. It's that number that gets compared with other applicants and will get you your interview invites (varies with schools). They'll let you explain in your interview why your EC's suck, but that's not what prevents you from getting an interview invite.

Are you a reapplicant? Have you taken other mcats and scored lower? Did you score an 11 in each section but a 3 in the verbal?

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
 
To those who find this thread relevant, what do you guys plan on doing about the situation? Would it be reasonable to email schools about your concerns?

What, exactly, are you going to say to them? It's appropriate at the end of the admissions cycle to contact one or two schools (usually your state school and/or your undergrad's affiliated med school, if they have one) and ask if they can tell you how to improve your application for admission for the next cycle. But right now contacting schools isn't going to do you much good. They'll probably just tell you you're still under review, and you have to wait.
 
The decision to invite someone for an interview is based off of a composite score (mentioned before). Once the interview takes place another score (an interview grade) is assigned to the student, and then the entire application gets scrutinized alongside the others who interviewed as well. Yes, there are other factors such as URM or disadvantaged....

Edit: Whenever a school is dealing with +3,000 applications there is simply no time to go through each one and look at every transcript and read every personal essay. They create a cutoff point using the composite score to determine who to invite for an interview, and then their applications are pored over.

composite score is not just your mcat and gpa dude.
 
I'm bringing this thread back to life.

cGPA: 3.47
sGPA: 3.87
MCAT: 41Q
verified late October

No interviews, but I have gotten a few rejections. How worried should I be right about now?
 
I'm bringing this thread back to life.

cGPA: 3.47
sGPA: 3.87
MCAT: 41Q
verified late October

No interviews, but I have gotten a few rejections. How worried should I be right about now?

Since you got verified late October, I guess you didn't send your secondaries until sometime in November?
Especially during this time, schools are probably backed up.
 
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

This is the exact process that was explained to my by the dean of admissions at san antonio. If I'm wrong then I guess he's wrong.
 
I'm bringing this thread back to life.

cGPA: 3.47
sGPA: 3.87
MCAT: 41Q
verified late October

No interviews, but I have gotten a few rejections. How worried should I be right about now?

You have a superb MCAT score. You should be getting some invites. Hang in there!!
 
I would love to hear your theories and suppositions.

It does not seem like you really understand how the application process work. Have you applied to medical school before? Are you applying this year? Yes, GPA and MCAT scores are important. But having a great GPA and high MCAT score does not guarantee you an interview. Other things (i.e. ECs, LORs) are part of the equation that determines whether or not you get an interview.
 
I'm bringing this thread back to life.

cGPA: 3.47
sGPA: 3.87
MCAT: 41Q
verified late October

No interviews, but I have gotten a few rejections. How worried should I be right about now?

Nice MCAT. You should be getting a few invites in the near future, I would assume.
 
This is the exact process that was explained to my by the dean of admissions at san antonio. If I'm wrong then I guess he's wrong.

That TX process is completely different than what the other US med schools do. Just had to throw that in there
 
There's a lot of people here with really good numbers. Keep the faith alive. I know this process can make you feel down, but there's always light at the end of the tunnel. 😀
 
Good luck everybody. We're rooting for you.

Still doesn't make sense. The interviews are pretty much based off your gpa/mcat....what they'll do is take your gpa and multiply it by your mcat score to calculate a composite score. It's that number that gets compared with other applicants and will get you your interview invites (varies with schools). They'll let you explain in your interview why your EC's suck, but that's not what prevents you from getting an interview invite.

Are you a reapplicant? Have you taken other mcats and scored lower? Did you score an 11 in each section but a 3 in the verbal?

The decision to invite someone for an interview is based off of a composite score (mentioned before). Once the interview takes place another score (an interview grade) is assigned to the student, and then the entire application gets scrutinized alongside the others who interviewed as well. Yes, there are other factors such as URM or disadvantaged....

Edit: Whenever a school is dealing with +3,000 applications there is simply no time to go through each one and look at every transcript and read every personal essay. They create a cutoff point using the composite score to determine who to invite for an interview, and then their applications are pored over.

This may be true of a few schools, but it is not true of every school (or even many schools). The process is highly variable from school to school; lots of schools do it a lot of different ways. 👍
 
This is the exact process that was explained to my by the dean of admissions at san antonio. If I'm wrong then I guess he's wrong.

You're right, if they do that in san antonio, that must be the way ALL med schools process applications. Thank you for your knowledgeable post. I m sure it helped a lot of applicants.
 
You're right, if they do that in san antonio, that must be the way ALL med schools process applications. Thank you for your knowledgeable post. I m sure it helped a lot of applicants.

If you could kindly point out where I indicated that this was true of all med schools I would appreciate it so that I can edit that. I can see now how the 'slow' in your name aptly applies. I wouldn't expect Harvard to have the same process of elimination as san antonio.

From my understanding you have to select underrepresented or disadvantaged for them to look more closely at your application and consider you for an invite. Do you really think that they look at every single one of the thousands of applications that they receive? Most schools will bluntly tell you no (although they do look at every gpa and mcat score).
 
You're right, if they do that in san antonio, that must be the way ALL med schools process applications. Thank you for your knowledgeable post. I m sure it helped a lot of applicants.

And you still haven't offered any of your ideas as to how they select for interviews......(waiting)
 
Good luck everybody. We're rooting for you.





This may be true of a few schools, but it is not true of every school (or even many schools). The process is highly variable from school to school; lots of schools do it a lot of different ways. 👍

Oh yeah, I agree completely....the dean had specified to me "that's how we do it here." A school that is categorized as 'competitive' vs a school categorized as 'non-competitive' will have very different processes.
 
And you still haven't offered any of your ideas as to how they select for interviews......(waiting)

Because MY "ideas" or YOUR "ideas" are meaningless. Actual schools have actual procedures and those vary from school to school.

In your "me-driven virtual world" everyone on SDN should be eager to see what your ideas are on how interviewees are selected.

I live in reality and I don't have access to 126 med school processes.

I will say that spending about 10 minutes on SDN will reveal that your MCAT/GPA formula is absurd. Very few schools base interviews solely on stats cutoffs. Hence, high stat people getting rejected and modest stat people getting interviews at many, many schools.

Geez.
 
Don't loose hope with your low mcat and/or gpa!! Patience! 👍
 
Last edited:
Because MY "ideas" or YOUR "ideas" are meaningless. Actual schools have actual procedures and those vary from school to school.

In your "me-driven virtual world" everyone on SDN should be eager to see what your ideas are on how interviewees are selected.

I live in reality and I don't have access to 126 med school processes.

I will say that spending about 10 minutes on SDN will reveal that your MCAT/GPA formula is absurd. Very few schools base interviews solely on stats cutoffs. Hence, high stat people getting rejected and modest stat people getting interviews at many, many schools.

Geez.

After they interview...and what I stated wasn't an idea. Like I said, it is what one dean at one school explained to me. What, did you think I just made it up out of the blue? You say I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about, but I would argue that you have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about. I'm not even sure that you're correctly reading what I'm writing....I'm talking about interview offers, not acceptance offers.
 
Oh yeah, I agree completely....the dean had specified to me "that's how we do it here." A school that is categorized as 'competitive' vs a school categorized as 'non-competitive' will have very different processes.

Every school (or at least most) will have a different process from every other school.
 
cGPA: 3.5
sGPA: 3.7
28 mcat
complete in mid August
applied to 12 schools (no state school to apply to)
 

Sorry. Some of the people in this thread have received ZERO interview invites and are nervously trying to prepare what to do with their lives if the worst case scenario does indeed occur.

You have an acceptance at one of the finest medical schools in the nation. I highly doubt they care about you wanting more invites. :laugh:
 
Top