Fuji ii as definitive restoration???

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Darya

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know if resin modified glass ionomer is considered a temp restoration by WREB.

I have found an ideal lesion that's opposing a tooth with a Fuji II restoration. According to WREB guidelines the restoration may not be opposing a temp restoration, but there is no defination of temp restoration in the candidate guide.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
According to GC recommendations, Fuji could be used as definitive restoration. They recommend Fujii IX for class II restorations.

Clinically, I don't think you could differentiate between fuji II or IX.
So, I'd asume they can't reject a lesion because the oposing tooth has a Fuji restoration.

Any comments would be appreciated.
 
why not just be safe and bring the patient in and re-do the restoration with composite/amalgam? you dont want to be guessing/worrying about whether your lesion is going to get accepted. leave no doubt
 
Top