- Joined
- Sep 18, 2015
- Messages
- 662
- Reaction score
- 864
- Points
- 5,421
- Location
- Theater for ugly people
- Resident [Any Field]
M2 here. Can I get some more advice on this?
I was thinking of doing just FM since it covers both EM, IM, Peds and OB and can get some of those positions in rural areas. Even OB jobs and hospitalist and ED and urgent care job opening have specific statements that they accept FM applicants. So FM appeals to me because of the security and wide-job market. Is this a bad idea to choose FM? I want to be a generalist because I don't like uncertainty and FM offers the most flexibility (and the international recognition of FM is massive compared to other specialties).
My interests: I love acute care, but I also love chronic care (I have experience being a scribe in both). So I can't exactly tell you I'm leaning EM. In fact, the appeal to EM for me was that I could work part time (a 7 shift stretch a month), have massive hobbies and still be pulling more than a full-time PCP/Hospitalist? Is this no longer true? Should I not consider EM?
EM here.
My take on it is as follows: FM is a good generalist for most common conditions. Being a jack of all trades they are a master of none. I would not seek out family medicine for OB care, emergency medical care, pediatrics, or dedicated internal medicine. There likely is an ongoing role for family medicine in very rural areas. However, most these rural areas aren't very desirable and FM winds up in more urban areas. In the emergency department, there is usually a significant gap between EM and FM trained physicians. The rate of Med Mal adverse outcomes reflects this as well. If you really want to do a bit of everything, you could aim for a FM/EM, IM/EM, or med/peds program. Alternatively, you can do FM with OB fellowship and be semi-passable at OB. Ask any L & D nurse and they know there is a difference.