Um, to anyone that hasn't noticed, this is from a 04/12/2007 post.
But, while it's still up here, I'll throw in my perspective:
I think the pharmacist is just trying to humor the situation by being brutally honest. Quite literally, you are working for free. Some people get paid to do this. Hell, some people get paid to do the job more poorly. Some people are being paid just to get trained to the point that you're at. And yet, you're doing it for free. If you were to measure things in a purely financial perspective, well, yup, you're a sucker.
But things aren't measured purely on a person's wage or salary. Money is a dominating, and hackneyed, aspect in society, but as a volunteer, despite the fact that everyone loves money, that's not what you're looking for. You're hoping to find experience, build character, build connections, and have something nice to show on your resume. And the thing is, most people will know that's what you're trying to do as a volunteer. And to me, this is where the humor is: That there are all these other subjective and intangible gains, but she chooses to point out the one glaring deficiency about being a volunteer - money.
When I've volunteered, I've never been shy to use synonyms to describe the job, including ones that poke fun at the non-paid nature of the position. The idea doesn't really bother me, and if someone called me a "sucker" and then had the overtness to add "just kidding" afterwards, I would have at least returned a smile.
--Garfield3d