Hawaii psychology licensure question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Dobbyisfree

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2020
Messages
13
Reaction score
35
Hi all. I've emailed the board for clarification last week but haven't heard back yet. Their website has some different language about the passing score for the eppp which can be confusing. The phrase they use is "a score of not less than the national average raw score (rounded up to the nearest whole integer if a fraction is reported) of all ph.d. candidates sitting for the examination for the first time shall be passing for the eppp written examination...for examination waiver applicants per the passing score for the eppp shall be the board's passing score at the time the applicant sat for the eppp written examination."... This makes me think it potentially is less than 500 but no clue how to confirm what the national average raw score is. Any insight would be appreciated! Thank you.

Members don't see this ad.
 
That language is probably very old and the application itself doesn't use/follow it anymore (and I don't know how they can obtain it since those are not "raw" score). I was told it's 500, and it's been the case for years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
That language is probably very old and the application itself doesn't use/follow it anymore (and I don't know how they can obtain it since those are not "raw" score). I was told it's 500, and it's been the case for years.
I'm just surprised they still have something so old on their website. The file even looks like it was typed and scanned in so I'm inclined to believe it is old, just unsure if it's still applies.
 
I'm just surprised they still have something so old on their website. The file even looks like it was typed and scanned in so I'm inclined to believe it is old, just unsure if it's still applies.

If it hasn't been revised, doesn't matter how old the statute is, it applies. Barring another statute that contradicts that one. That's a different can of worms.
 
If I hear back, I'll report back and let you folks know. Thanks for your thoughts!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top