Last edited:
Thanks for reply.
Its my every day Nightmare.
Have you talked with your PIC? You are staff so my schedule should not be your worry, does your PIC have adequate help on his days? He/she could be screwing you with help.I am one unhappy Staff Pharmacist at CVS
I love my job as Pharmacist as I truly appreciate working for my customers who are best part of working with but I am constantly put up with lots of pressure by not having enough staff to help me,Sometime its only me left to work without Tech help for more than 4-5 hours, if help does arrive they would be front store people who recently getting trained as tech .
I emailed so many times to sup,PM can not manage the staff or myschedule well.
I have been going through lots of stress sometimes I fear for my license.
Please help me to make a decision.
I work in DFW area,Market is pretty saturated here.
I am really worried about my patients safety as well.
I am petty much in your shoes but its nearly 300 Rx per day store.
I am pretty scared working there now.
I need to take decision in spite of knowing I would be jobless for few weeks.
I can not kill myself more.
I reach to the breaking point.
Thanks again.
CVS may be the worst but it is getting like this everywhere. I have worked at stores that are 170 scripts behind due to poor staffing or working by myself filling 50 to 100 Rx by myself with constant pickup lines and drive thru patients. You are 1 person expected to be 3 places at once while also providing medical care safely.
Sorry at Walmart pharmacists do nothing but Verify. Don't need to get the phone and techs can't even talk to the pharmacists without talking to a couple techs first. At the real chains you are getting the phone, typing, probably running to drive thru and have techs asking you questions while you verify. It's just not safe practice to have multiple meds in a bag. Also the real chains are higher volumes. Drugs everywhere.What kind of pharmacists screw up putting multiple Rx in a bag? Bagging is even a clerk/sales associate function at Walmart for most states.
Sorry at Walmart pharmacists do nothing but Verify. Don't need to get the phone and techs can't even talk to the pharmacists without talking to a couple techs first. At the real chains you are getting the phone, typing, probably running to drive thru and have techs asking you questions while you verify. It's just not safe practice to have multiple meds in a bag. Also the real chains are higher volumes. Drugs everywhere.
And having techs/sales clerks bag your drugs is the dumbest thing. You are responsible if they put stuff in the wrong bag. There are some idiot pharmacist who verify stuff and leave them in the baskets for people who barely passed high school to bag drugs. I'm good off that
Hopefully you have a job lined up or you just F'd yourselfI took decisions and put my resignation today.
They accepted it
I am not sure now what
I took decisions and put my resignation today.
They accepted it
I am not sure now what
Curious as to what grounds you can state you need flma for? Are there easy bs reasons you can claim without needing proof?why didn't you request FMLA? during your leave of absence 1) you get paid. 2) you have time to apply for another job. 3) if you don't get another job, you can take your vacations and have an option to come back.
.Curious as to what grounds you can state you need flma for? Are there easy bs reasons you can claim without needing proof?
.
anxiety. its when you're overly stressed working at cvs, and u have nightmares from the elevated stress. see a doctor and get a script for anxiety.
What Is the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)?
If you do one basket at a time, I don't see a problem. And are we really focusing on multiple Rxs in a bag when it comes to cvs non-safety.... Teach your techs not to interrupt you or actually learn how to learn
All this talk about real chains when Kaiser, at least where they exist, sops up a lot of potential script volume but WM still has to deal with butthurt kaiser members
I thought you don't have to disclose your health status to your employers (HIPAA privacy law)?Having a documented mental illness isn't such a benign thing. It can be quite detrimental to your ability to secure a job that requires security clearance (i.e. practically any federal government job), as well as it can affect your ability to buy insurance policies (health, long term care, life, etc.). In other words, there are consequences to faking a mental illness that might not make it worthwhile in the long run.
I thought you don't have to disclose your health status to your employers (HIPAA privacy law)?
You don't have to disclose your health status, but if you don't disclose or if you knowingly withhold information, you will be disqualified from applying to the job (or terminated later on if it comes to light that you were dishonest when you first applied). HIPAA protects you from your information being shared without your permission, it doesn't mean that your potential employer can't ask you for your PHI as a condition of employment.
Having a history of a mental health condition doesn't necessarily guarantee you won't be able to get a security clearance, but it will come up. See page 84 (page 87 of the pdf) of SF84 (Form: SF86).
wow you guys have it rough...as a physician with licenses in 3 different states and having gained privileges at multiple institutes in the past 5 years, mental health (or any medical condition) is a non-issue (provided you are able to fulfill your duties and function in that particular position)
Physician or pharmacist or any profession, if you need to obtain security clearance (jobs in which you have access to any information that is related to national security, which sometimes includes government healthcare jobs, especially if you are involved in emergency preparedness, bioterrorism counter-measures, and other public health projects that cross-over with national security), you will be asked if you have sought care from a health care professional for any mental health issues. The specific mental health issue may end up being a non-issue, but you will still be asked about it and will be required to provide additional documentation for the investigator to determine whether or not it is a non-issue.
If the OP cannot imagine ever wanting a job that requires a security clearance, then having a documented mental health illness probably won't make much of a difference in terms of finding a job in the future. It still could come up as a reason for increased premiums or denial of private health, long term care, or life insurance, though.
Physician or pharmacist or any profession, if you need to obtain security clearance (jobs in which you have access to any information that is related to national security, which sometimes includes government healthcare jobs, especially if you are involved in emergency preparedness, bioterrorism counter-measures, and other public health projects that cross-over with national security), you will be asked if you have sought care from a health care professional for any mental health issues. The specific mental health issue may end up being a non-issue, but you will still be asked about it and will be required to provide additional documentation for the investigator to determine whether or not it is a non-issue.
If the OP cannot imagine ever wanting a job that requires a security clearance, then having a documented mental health illness probably won't make much of a difference in terms of finding a job in the future. It still could come up as a reason for increased premiums or denial of private health, long term care, or life insurance, though.
Aside from working in a VA (which is typically not that competitive from a physician standpoint) I can't think of jobs that would require security clearance...
I don't think this should be held against anyone provided that they have received appropriate treatment but at the end of the day it comes to supply and demand with respect to a particular field
What about something as simple as going to a psychiatrist or FP doctor to get Adderall for ADD? I remember in undergrad that pretty much everyone was finding an excuse to get diagnosed with ADD, either so they could get an Adderall prescription and/or so they could get extra time to take tests.
I would guess that an applicant should answer "yes" to question 21 on SF86 if they sought care for ADD/ADHD within the past 7 years. Whether or not that would prevent them from obtaining a security clearance, I don't know, it probably depends on several factors. Aside from security clearance concerns, ADHD (that requires ongoing management with medication) is a disqualifying condition for service in the Armed Forces and the Public Health Service.
That's surprising (the part about it being a disqualifying condition for Armed Forces/Public Health Service work). If more than 7 years have passed since getting a diagnosis, would someone still need to answer "yes" to question 21? What if someone is a patient of one of those really nice FP docs that prescribes his "safe" patients (I.e., those without a history of drug abuse, drug seeking, etc.) a just-in-case prescription of 30 5 mg Adderall tabs every few months that they practically never take? If someone checks "no" to question 21, can they somehow access their health records to find out they're lying?
Have you ever used ethics line,In cvs.
Well I am going to go ahead and further derail the thread and say that 30 Adderall every few months is hardly "just in case" or "hardly ever taken".
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using SDN mobile
In that case I would say the doctor is negligent to a very high degree. It's not McDonald's where they ask if you want fries with that. What possible reason could the doctor have to write that script unprompted? And why would the patient keep filling it if they really are just stockpiling?What if it is primarily stockpiled (that's where the just in case part comes from), the patient tells the doctor this, and the doctor asks them if they want more anyways since the old Adderall "might not work as well?" It's not like someone is going to turn them down
In that case I would say the doctor is negligent to a very high degree. It's not McDonald's where they ask if you want fries with that. What possible reason could the doctor have to write that script unprompted? And why would the patient keep filling it if they really are just stockpiling?
Your scenario makes no sense.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using SDN mobile
Basically, it's a situation where, after being told by the patient that they are in graduate school and that they sometimes have a hard time focusing and/or have a tendency to procrastinate, the conversation turns to ADD meds and the doctor basically says they can give the patient a one-month supply of Adderall to use during "cram" sessions, just in case. The same doctor also has a tendency to offer patients a one-month supply of Ativan or Xanax if the patient tells them that they have to give presentations in front of the class from time to time that they get nervous or anxious during.
Anyways, I guess I was just wondering in general how damning a diagnosis of ADD can be to someone's future career (even if they don't actually "have" it) after the subject was brought up. Back on topic now...
That's surprising (the part about it being a disqualifying condition for Armed Forces/Public Health Service work). If more than 7 years have passed since getting a diagnosis, would someone still need to answer "yes" to question 21? What if someone is blablablablabla someone tell me how to manage this incredibly precise totally irrelevant scenario
I took decisions and put my resignation today.
They accepted it
I am not sure now what