I have an honest question for people going DO. This is not me trying to start a fight or flame. And yes, I do understand the difference between DO and MD and the different way of approaching problems from the DO way of thinking.
This is my question. Are there any of you out there that DO is your honest first choice? Or is it a backup plan (but in my opinion a good backup plan) for you?
I am just curious as to whether there are people that believe really strongly in the DO way of thinking, so much that they'd prefer DO over MD. I just have no idea.
Again, I know this could be a touchy subject, my intent is not to start a fight
SDN Pre-osteo has been rather tense the last couple of months, you may unitentionally cause a flame-war. Oh well... Nate likes to close threads anyway.
kidding, of course.
You are correct, many use DO as a backup plan. For me, I view DO as being the same as MD with a very small and arguably a superficial difference in OMM... Because of that, I applied to both MD and DO concurrently, and was PLEASED when I received interview invites and acceptances to the DO schools that gave me a shot.
With that said, I am entirely unsure of whether I would have taken a comparable MD acceptance over my PCOM acceptance. For instance, if Drexel had interviewed and accepted me, my choice may have been MD. I do believe that MD keeps a few doors open that may not otherwise be the case. In Pennsylvania, the choice to apply to both was a no-brainer. With PCOM having a stellar reputation and LECOM churning out additional DOs, the state is very DO-friendly in most areas. Other regions of the country may be different.
The name of the game is the maximizing your opportunities. Would I have taken a U of Penn or Penn State acceptance over PCOM... yes, without a doubt. But it is not because of MD vs DO it is because they are powerhouse names with stellar reputations. Same goes for any of the top-ranked institutions. It may be that these institutions offer a lesser clinical training than PCOM, but I am a firm believer in keeping as many options open as possible for as long as possible...
There is no simple answer that generalizes to all people. Rather, the choice to go DO is dependent upon your regional preference, your desire for top allopathic residencies (
some of which ARE STILL OBTAINABLE WITH DO), and your self-confidence.
If you do not want to explain to people what DO or after four years of intense training you would feel cheated in some way, go MD.
If you do not want to have an impossible or uphill battle for, say, Hopkins Neurosurgery, go MD.
If you want to become a great physician and that is your chief concern, DO is an excellent option.
If you want to do research, DO schools are becoming increasingly involved in research but the major grants
typically go to larger academic powerhouses -- mostly MD (exceptions: UMDNJ-SOM, OSUCOM, MSUCOM, and to a lesser extent, PCOM and NYCOM..)
If you want the opportunity to practice medicine in ANY field of medicine, DO CAN TAKE YOU THERE.
Going MD is simpler and the more beaten path, IMHO. But there are some great DO schools available. You would be doing yourself a tremendous disservice by not even considering an application to some of the major DO programs.