Oh give me a break
Somehow, the 99.27% of families that can't afford a nanny get by without one, even the ones that have two working parents and rely on paid daycare.
My wife was a stay-at-home mom for our three kids, the first born my first semester of medical school. Sometimes I was away for months at a time for clerkships at distant hospitals. And then I was an intern. And then I was a Navy GMO who deployed for 7 months to Afghanistan, and then again for another 7 to Iraq. And then I was a resident. My kids were 8, 10, 12 when I finished training.
I have exactly zero illusions about how hard she worked as the stay-at-home parent. One set of grandparents lived 3000 miles away. The other set lived 6000 miles away. They visited fairly often and helped out. We made use of neighbors and babysitters. The concept of hiring a nanny? Guess what, my wife was tired. Guess what, so was I.
This forum is, very often, a swirling vortex of financial reality distortion. I don't know where to rank the "necessity" of 8-figure retirement accounts, vs the "necessity" of home ownership in Silicon Valley, vs the "necessity" of hiring a nanny to ease the load of a stay-at-home parent.
Obviously stay-at-home parents work hard. It should be equally obvious that having a paid nanny is a luxury very few people can afford, and one that few people who CAN afford it actually indulge in.
Every one of these threads makes it more obvious to me why doctors grossing the better part of a $million per year are somehow, somehow feeling a pinch.