- Joined
- May 14, 2015
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 2
I have recently begun my MCAT Prep journey for my May 2016 exam, and have a full collection of TPR Review and practice books at my disposal. After a preliminary skim through the section on the nervous and endocrine systems, it occurred to me that far too much bolded vocabulary is not coupled with distinct definitions/explanations. (I have picked up a couple of Kaplan and TBR review books as well, and this appears to be a universal trend). However, I really have a hard time seeing how the structure and function of an axon, for instance, can be understood from the two sentences written in these review books to the degree that will be required for an MCAT passage/question.
Thus, I wish to ask you all...
How are you using your review books to learn material/dust off mastery of old material?
Are you supplementing review books with your old textbooks, for instance?
Do any of you know of a good metric for measuring content knowledge, or does it just need to be felt out while doing practice passages? In other words, how should one know when they've read enough to actually then have a meaningful experience doing practice problems?
Thank you very much for your time and input. Good luck to you all!
Thus, I wish to ask you all...
How are you using your review books to learn material/dust off mastery of old material?
Are you supplementing review books with your old textbooks, for instance?
Do any of you know of a good metric for measuring content knowledge, or does it just need to be felt out while doing practice passages? In other words, how should one know when they've read enough to actually then have a meaningful experience doing practice problems?
Thank you very much for your time and input. Good luck to you all!