Hi
@PopeKnope98 -
Can details like that be tested? Yes. I think that SB question shows that to be the case. Are they
likely to be tested? Not especially. More to the point, given the finite amount of time we all have, is it a good use of your time to focus super small-scale details? For most MCAT students, keeping in mind that by definition the < 510 range by definition includes the vast majority of students, almost certainly not. As always, it's a question of prioritization. One of the reasons why you commonly hear advice to focus on logic and mechanisms is because insights in those domains can pay off on multiple questions (& even on passage reading/comprehension), whereas knowing by heart (for example), the specific structures of succinate, fumarate, and malate will
at best pay off on one question, and at that the odds are not very high. So I think it depends on where you're at -- if you're making good progress with practice materials, and you don't have any other areas of content that need major review (using the AAMC content outline to self-assess can be helpful), then it could make sense to hone in on this level of detail, but I wouldn't generally recommend it unless everything else is on point in your studying.
Hope this helps provide some insight into the situation!