- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
- Messages
- 445
- Reaction score
- 803
What if they steal your NFTs
You mean taking a screenshot? š
What if they steal your NFTs
Honestly the only difference I see is the likelihood of getting caught. Both situations are stealing.Stop moving the goalposts and being purposely obtuse lol there's a difference between directly stealing someone's property and stealing intellectual property on the internet
No. And even if it were cheaper people would still do it. In fact the fact that so many people do this leads to the price being high so that he can make decent money from the people who try to do right in the world.Do you feel like the high price justifies it?
Depending on who you are it is either amoral or immoral, but its never moral, so in short, yes.Is it amoral no matter what?
No. It would not result in a significant higher number of people paying. The people who steal it either think its fine (amoral) or know its wrong and just don't care (immoral). Even if it were $20 a year the same people would steal it. It would be cheaper for the honest individuals, but then it would not be worth it for Dr. Ryan to even make it in the first place. Honestly he probably set his prices assuming that roughly 10% of students would actually pay for it, thus the thieves make it more expensive for honest individuals.Do you think if they lowered the price but went after shared accounts that would be more fair?
Thats my take and my final post on the matter. Don't listen to these amoral and immoral individuals.What's your take on the issue.
Idk about the nfts, but dogecoin isn't an accurate comparison. That's a form of currency vs information. I would liken stealing that to using the internet to clear out someones bank account. I would liken using bootlegged bnb or sketchy vids to downloading a movie or something.What if they steal your NFTs or dogecoin?
I think this is being a bit obtuse. Clearly $20 a year would result in far greater people subscribing. Same goes for $100. There are monetary values where it incentivizes marginalized students to just pay the price rather than spend hours of their precious time tracking down pirated versions, but there is a breaking point where it becomes more feasible for them to spend their time instead of their money (that they donāt have). Although I get the argument for setting the price extraordinarily high to account for piracy, it was clearly not a sustainable long-term business strategy.No. It would not result in a significant higher number of people paying. The people who steal it either think its fine (amoral) or know its wrong and just don't care (immoral). Even if it were $20 a year the same people would steal it.
That doesn't really address this argument.If your medical school had a way to tell whether you paid for or pirated the material, would you still pirate it? If potential residency programs could tell if you paid for or pirated the material, would you still pirate it?
Moderator note:
Multiple posts in this thread have been edited or removed as they contained personal attacks, quoted the offending post, and/or were a direct response to them. Personal attacks are never appropriate on these forums. Reasonable people can disagree on matters of substance, and it is possible to disagree without being disagreeable. Thank you for your understanding.
To help cool down this thread, please enjoy this picture:
View attachment 364953
This is giving me gods always watching vibes.If your medical school had a way to tell whether you paid for or pirated the material, would you still pirate it? If potential residency programs could tell if you paid for or pirated the material, would you still pirate it?
I agree with this. If you have family that will give you money if you need it and you're not at a real risk of going broke just buy it.My parents didn't pay for college, much less medical school. I worked and got scholarships and saved, etc. And now for medical school I'm borrowing A LOT of money (like most of us).
I still think companies should be compensated for creating their products. Physicians shouldn't have to work for for free, neither should the guys at Sketchy etc. I've found a way to pay for stuff with my loan money.
Now, do I blame people who are really struggling financially from using pirated videos? Nah, nobody is perfect. Now my classmate who drives a Tesla getting them for free- that's screwed up IMHO
This is nonsense. So if you have the money then you are morally compelled to buy it, but if you don't its perfectly fine to steal it?I agree with this. If you have family that will give you money if you need it and you're not at a real risk of going broke just buy it.
Hopefully, through time, you will see the world isnāt as black or white, even though morals can be.This is nonsense. So if you have the money then you are morally compelled to buy it, but if you don't its perfectly fine to steal it?
Thatāll never happen. This steal from the rich and give to the poor leftist ideology is nonsense. And honestly it stems from jealousy.Hopefully, through time, you will see the world isnāt as black or white, even though morals can be.
If a study resource is important, i will pay for it even if it is expensive. I donāt trust the quality of pirated versions, and the creators of the study resources should be compensated for their workDo you feel like the high price justifies it? Is it amoral no matter what? Do you think if they lowered the price but went after shared accounts that would be more fair? What's your take on the issue.
Kant > utilitarianismCalm down, Immanuel Kant.
Stealing intellectual property is terrible and i donāt know why people are defending this. Thereās a good reason why patent and copyright laws existStop moving the goalposts and being purposely obtuse lol there's a difference between directly stealing someone's property and stealing intellectual property on the internet
To be fair, pirated videos arenāt always accurate. The official sites can be (and are) regularly updating their content, so quite frankly, pirating is self-defeating.Now, do I blame people who are really struggling financially from using pirated videos?
Stealing intellectual property is terrible and i donāt know why people are defending this. Thereās a good reason why patent and copyright laws exist
Seriously, if you find a resource to be useful, you should pay for it.
My myopic worldview is hilarious. The presumption I am a leftist, even more!Thatāll never happen. This steal from the rich and give to the poor leftist ideology is nonsense. And honestly it stems from jealousy.
Pirating is an intentional act. Exceeding the speed limit isnāt always intentional.You ever drive faster than the speed limit? That's a crime that could actually kill someone.
Like that guy said earlier, some things are just simply not worth crying over
Pirating is an intentional act. Exceeding the speed limit isnāt always intentional.
Like i get it, people canāt afford resources. But if weāre willing to take on huge debt for med school, much of which is wasted on the greedy admins, taking on additional expense for actually good study resources is worth it. Not just for ethical/moral reasons, but for accuracy reasons too
Whenever I have sped its usually not a situation where I say to myself "I know the speed limit but I just don't care I'm going to surpass it" but rather I just happen to notice I am going faster than I should be and was not aware of it. I think this is how it is with most people. Whereas one doesn't just get carried away and mindlessly access pirated content. They were looking for it and knew it is something they are supposed to pay for but just don't care.How is exceeding the speed limit not intentional? The driver is the only one controlling the acceleration of the vehicle lol
Whenever I have sped its usually not a situation where I say to myself "I know the speed limit but I just don't care I'm going to surpass it" but rather I just happen to notice I am going faster than I should be and was not aware of it. I think this is how it is with most people. Whereas one doesn't just get carried away and mindlessly access pirated content. They were looking for it and knew it is something they are supposed to pay for but just don't care.
Moderator note:
Multiple posts in this thread have been edited or removed as they contained personal attacks, quoted the offending post, and/or were a direct response to them. Personal attacks are never appropriate on these forums. Reasonable people can disagree on matters of substance, and it is possible to disagree without being disagreeable. Thank you for your understanding.
To help cool down this thread, please enjoy this picture:
View attachment 364953
Seeing something as not just black/white wonāt happen or just this specifically? Once you are out of medschool then pretty much everything in medicine becomes a part of the greyscale.Thatāll never happen. This steal from the rich and give to the poor leftist ideology is nonsense. And honestly it stems from jealousy.
Yep. I chose to pay for sketchy and had a really nice UI and updated notes on the sketches. I also simultaneously watched my peers struggle through glitchy videos that were certainly not updated in comparison. I did not hold that against them that I paid and they didnāt.If a study resource is important, i will pay for it even if it is expensive. I donāt trust the quality of pirated versions, and the creators of the study resources should be compensated for their work
it is immoral, but in our society, does anyone really care about morality anymore?Do you feel like the high price justifies it? Is it amoral no matter what? Do you think if they lowered the price but went after shared accounts that would be more fair? What's your take on the issue.
I don't think it's contradictory. I think you can create a product and the way you distribute it you can put whatever security mechanisms you want. However, once the product is purchased, it becomes The property of the owner to do with it as they see fit. If your product is such that it can be replicated, that is your own bad luck. I wouldn't say that I'm stealing if I make a photocopy of a page from a book in the library. In fact, most libraries have copy machines. If I obtain a copy from someone, that's my own private transaction with that person and not your business. Do you understand now?
Your argument is somewhat flawed as you're talking about transforming them into something illegal and harmful, but yes, if you want to make meth, i don't careBy that logic, cooking and selling meth is ok. Because if I buy all the ingredients, which are all commercially available, then I should be able to do whatever I want with them and sell the final product.
Your argument is somewhat flawed as you're talking about transforming them into something illegal and harmful, but yes, if you want to make meth, i don't care
I agree, except that i don't think the government should decide that. Culture and knowledge should steer people away from self harm behaviorIt seems to me like you fundamentally believe that individuals should be allowed to do what they want as long as they arenāt directly harming someone else. But I think thatās a very limited world view. The world is becoming increasingly interconnected, and so itās very important to consider the ramifications that individual actions have on society as a whole.
A lot of nurses, physicians, even respiratory therapists know that smoking is bad. The US and healthcare culture is not conducive to smoking. But they do anyway.I agree, except that i don't think the government should decide that. Culture and knowledge should steer people away from self harm behavior