- Joined
- Mar 7, 2008
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm finding it a bit frustrating the way grades are assigned during 3rd year. The subjective and whimsical nature of it can be ridiculous at times. One resident I had on service spent zero time on my eval. She just checked the middle box straight down the page and then wrote "Student did a good job." under the comments on the back. Then, another resident on the same service actually wrote a more meaningful eval with some real comments on the back. Then there was an attending that my classmate saw exactly 1 time during his time on the rotation. This attending went on vacation soon after, but had a reputation of giving very high marks to everyone regardless. And so my classmate naturally got a high grade in the rotation. Some attendings think that an "honors" performance is a student who does all of his work and completes assignments and tasks and performs appropriately, while other attendings will not give honors unless you simply amaze them or do something way out of the way impressive. (like curing cancer)
I guess my question is regarding how rad onc programs perceive 3rd year grades. How badly will it reflect on you to get all passes but with great comments and critiques? I felt like I worked my butt off in every rotation but the attending or residents don't fully understand how greatly the 1 page check marks and comments affect your grade. It's like they don't even bother remembering who you are sometimes. I don't want to give the impression of being incompetent or lazy or not caring on clinical rotations, but the method of grading just seems to be irrepresentative of performance. The shelf exam counts for a relatively small portion of our grade and I found out from upper classmen that my school is particularly stingy about handing out honors and near honors.
My understanding from one of the deans that I've spoken to is that the most important thing is to do well and impress on rad onc away rotations. Anyone have any thoughts?
Thanks
I guess my question is regarding how rad onc programs perceive 3rd year grades. How badly will it reflect on you to get all passes but with great comments and critiques? I felt like I worked my butt off in every rotation but the attending or residents don't fully understand how greatly the 1 page check marks and comments affect your grade. It's like they don't even bother remembering who you are sometimes. I don't want to give the impression of being incompetent or lazy or not caring on clinical rotations, but the method of grading just seems to be irrepresentative of performance. The shelf exam counts for a relatively small portion of our grade and I found out from upper classmen that my school is particularly stingy about handing out honors and near honors.
My understanding from one of the deans that I've spoken to is that the most important thing is to do well and impress on rad onc away rotations. Anyone have any thoughts?
Thanks