- Joined
- Jan 9, 2017
- Messages
- 184
- Reaction score
- 130
I actually had a really positive experience with Orgo I and II. Tbh, I think a lot of professors just don't know how to teach it effectively. I was lucky enough to have a really great teacher that made everything make sense. He had a reputation across the area (there are a lot of colleges around where I go to school) as one of the best Orgo professors. He was definitely challenging, and his tests REALLY made you think, but I got A's in both Orgo I and Orgo II. Tip: if you're relying on memorization instead of finding patterns for your orgo class, then you're not learning the material effectively. You shouldn't have to rely on memorization with the exception of a few things like nomenclature and the different methods of spectroscopy. If you know and understand the patterns and know how to identify why x compound reacts with y, then you should be golden.
For me, Inorganic and Physical Chem (basically part II of intro chem, but that's what it was called at my school because it involved a little bit more material) was harder than Orgo I and Orgo II.
Also, I really enjoyed Biochem as well. It helps to take both Orgo I and II before you take biochem because there are a few things from Orgo II that you might need, but it's not necessary.
Now, Physics, that was a different story. I've never been a Physics person.
For me, Inorganic and Physical Chem (basically part II of intro chem, but that's what it was called at my school because it involved a little bit more material) was harder than Orgo I and Orgo II.
Also, I really enjoyed Biochem as well. It helps to take both Orgo I and II before you take biochem because there are a few things from Orgo II that you might need, but it's not necessary.
Now, Physics, that was a different story. I've never been a Physics person.
Last edited: