- Joined
- Jun 3, 2021
- Messages
- 44
- Reaction score
- 20
Considering whether I want to go into medicine. If I did, psychiatry is one of my major leanings as a speciality. I really love pharmacology and psychopharmacology—especially theorizing about things like augmentation strategies and visualizing how all these drugs interact in the brain, distribute through tissues, and use pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics to make reasonable predictions about drugs including concentrations, transporter occupancy, possible CYP450 interactions, etc.
While I think the facet of drug discovery/pharmacy in itself is quite interesting, I feel like I’d be missing the ability to actually put my “skills” to use (read: taking other psychopharmacologist’s ideas, altering them for my specific situation/patient, and then trying them out in practice and adjusting accordingly). I feel like I miss out on actually seeing these medications work in reality and forming a connection between the science of a drug and actually seeing those mechanisms come to life to improve, or even save, a life, if I were to go with a purely pharmacological path (unless on the very small chance I successfully develop a drug).
How much psychopharmacological/creative freedom like this does psychiatry afford? I suppose it’d vary from private practice vs. working in a hospital (where it might not be possible until you’re not under someone, if at all). Basically, if I take my extremely treatment-resistant cases, would it be a good and effective use of my time to research possible augmentations and even come up with some “novel” feasible ideas and try those myself?
Could I go doing “risky” things like combining MAOIs + stimulants (say in a patient with severe TRD and possibly ADHD) and set myself as a psychiatrist who’s willing to try more unorthodox but medically safe (read Ken Gillman for MAOI danger being blown out of proportion for example)? Or, would I be stuck being “forced” (either by culture if private or a higher up if in a hospital) to prescribe medications very algorithmically for disorders with no creative freedom/outside the box thinking and end up bored?
I’m really interested if anyone has talked to psychs or is a psych with an idea of these kind of things like creative freedom, and I’m sure some others are too!
While I think the facet of drug discovery/pharmacy in itself is quite interesting, I feel like I’d be missing the ability to actually put my “skills” to use (read: taking other psychopharmacologist’s ideas, altering them for my specific situation/patient, and then trying them out in practice and adjusting accordingly). I feel like I miss out on actually seeing these medications work in reality and forming a connection between the science of a drug and actually seeing those mechanisms come to life to improve, or even save, a life, if I were to go with a purely pharmacological path (unless on the very small chance I successfully develop a drug).
How much psychopharmacological/creative freedom like this does psychiatry afford? I suppose it’d vary from private practice vs. working in a hospital (where it might not be possible until you’re not under someone, if at all). Basically, if I take my extremely treatment-resistant cases, would it be a good and effective use of my time to research possible augmentations and even come up with some “novel” feasible ideas and try those myself?
Could I go doing “risky” things like combining MAOIs + stimulants (say in a patient with severe TRD and possibly ADHD) and set myself as a psychiatrist who’s willing to try more unorthodox but medically safe (read Ken Gillman for MAOI danger being blown out of proportion for example)? Or, would I be stuck being “forced” (either by culture if private or a higher up if in a hospital) to prescribe medications very algorithmically for disorders with no creative freedom/outside the box thinking and end up bored?
I’m really interested if anyone has talked to psychs or is a psych with an idea of these kind of things like creative freedom, and I’m sure some others are too!