- Joined
- Dec 3, 2003
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 0
esposo said:I will give you the benefit of the doubt but I can't say that I'm doubtful of his methods. Bubbling sounds like too much extra work. It reminds me of all those "cute" study techniques in the early 90's that made you use colored pencils and the like. But I have found these type of study techniques to be a gimic for the most part. They tend to be highly impractical. I mean who has time to bubble and make tons of drawings for anatomy? It doesn't sound practical at all. But I'm willing to check out the book anyway.
Well, do you honestly have time to read and reread all of your anatomy, biochem, histo, and whatever else you are taking? The point of Dr. Pelley's book is that passive reading is NOT effective studying. If you adapt the notes to a way of learning that is best for you, you will learn much faster. Bubble diagrams tie in facts that, on the surface, don't have much to do with each other. It may take longer initially to make the diagrams and stuff like that, but in the long run, what is faster? Reading the same 200 page passage three or four times, or going through it thoroughly once and organizing it to fit your learning style?
Of course, I don't bubble diagram everything in my classes, but some things like the brachial plexus, or the axillary artery in the arm are tough just to straight memorize. It helped me to bubble diagram the branches, where they go, and what levels branches come off. It took me about 1/2 the time to get it down than if I'd tried to read it out of a book, or just looked at a diagram for hours upon hours.
Again, get Pelley's book, he's a lot more eloquent than I am, and explains the methods much better.