Well, anatomy, systems neuro, and endocrinology are all easy classes at my school, so they must be easy at every university in the world. I'm drawing the conclusion that you must be stupid.
at the school of disjointed thought processes?
Well, anatomy, systems neuro, and endocrinology are all easy classes at my school, so they must be easy at every university in the world. I'm drawing the conclusion that you must be stupid.
at the school of disjointed thought processes?
I hope you're kidding. You made the same assumption about the OP.
I based my assumptions in logic which was explained gratuitously. Perhaps before making baseless accusations you should read the entire conversation instead of just browsing beginning and end.
I did, actually, but I doubt you'll believe me, since you also missed that I was simply pointing out why Double Trouble said what he said. Well, at least you're being a bit less of a dick now.
Well, anatomy, systems neuro, and endocrinology are all easy classes at my school, so they must be easy at every university in the world. I'm drawing the conclusion that you must be stupid.
So you don't think if people really want something, they will try harder and care more?
The OP has shown more concern about his future career in medicine to others who are in the same categorization of being premed ("those" kids). "Those" kids bring down the percentage of premeds in each class.
Posting on the internet = googling a premed relevant topic, finding SDN, caring enough to make an account, and caring enough to make a thread.
I agree with you that hard work isn't enough. But his mindset certainly makes a difference. It's not all white and black, effort does pay off in the long run even if he bombs one or two tests, or gets a B in a class.
And whats with all the snarky remarks like "I don't feel like explaining it again" and all the other posts on this thread?
Most of "those" kids who don't make it close to applying are the ones who, freshman year, thought that being a doctor like on House and making a lot of money would be cool. Then, after joining a greek organization and failing their first test, they switched to something else.
Edit: So you shouldn't compare OPs chances of becoming a doctor to an overall statistic.
A good doctor isn't someone who buries their head into a book and studies 24/7. A good doctor is someone who manages time well, studies when they need to, is reasonably intelligent, and has an innate curiosity about medicine and the body.
Baseless. The conclusion does not logically follow based on what I said about my classes.
TBH this should all have been stuff you saw in hs. Since the state of public education is pretty decrepit in some areas so I will assume this is the first time you are seeing it. These are very easy concepts to master. It's possible you are just adjusting to college but the odds of actually making it to med school are not in your favor. The difference between students who start out pre-med compared to the percentage that actually get accepted is very high.
My point isn't that it's an intro bio class which is harped on later. the point is that this is very easy subject material. You don't need to spend hours sitting in a corner to learn it. Punnet squares are common sense. And guess what. This isn't the only time you are going to see this. The HW theory of equilibrium and Mendelian genetics are tested on the MCAT along with other gen bio concepts. You may not be stupid and a B will not kill your chances for med school, but you make it sound like you found this info very challenging. What is going to happen when you start learning about the intricacies of the endocrine system or how the concentration gradients of the kidney work to remove wastes from the blood? If it is the strict memorization you have a problem with how are you ever going to remember all the cranial nerves and their functions?
This is some of the easiest biology you will experience. it's like a step up from common sense.
Yes, speciation and punnet squares are more difficult concepts at Harvard than other schools.
That's the point. Double Trouble was mocking the assumptions you made about the OP by making equally fallacious assumptions about you. You did, in fact, say that since biology is simple memorization the OP must not have what it takes if he doesn't feel he did well on the test, even though biology might not be simple memorization at the OP's school. You've obviously changed your mind now, but Double Trouble posted before you made it clear that you changed your mind.
Nope. Feel free to play again though.
The only time strict memorization is brought up is to highlight the difference from the concept learning I was talking about.
Nope. Feel free to play again though.
The only time strict memorization is brought up is to highlight the difference from the concept learning I was talking about.
That's the point. Double Trouble was mocking the assumptions you made about the OP by making equally fallacious assumptions about you. You did, in fact, say that since biology is simple memorization the OP must not have what it takes if he doesn't feel he did well on the test, even though biology might not be simple memorization at the OP's school and no one knew how well the OP actually did. You've obviously changed your mind now, but Double Trouble posted before you made it clear that you changed your mind.
Nice thinly veiled shot at my undergrad. Believe it or not, most accredited colleges try to challenge their students conceptually. I would never be proud of a B- in gen bio btw.
[...] it is wrong to just assume intro to bio is a piece of cake at every college. It varies depending on prof and uni.

yea that guy did make some crazy assumptions about my class.. My bio teacher emphasizes on problem solving. If she emphasized memorization, i would make an A no doubt....everyone would. But since it is scenarios and problem solving, it is very hard to sit there and think about 30 scenarios and pick the best answer between answers that could all be right, and do it within an hour time limit. Im not saying it cant be done, obviously there were some people who made A's, but it is definitely different than what im used to. This is my first semester at UT so i guess I was also very nervous about this test. Idk...hopefully i made a 70+ but i know i cant make above an 80. But regardless of how i did, it is wrong to just assume intro to bio is a piece of cake at every college. It varies depending on prof and uni.

I ended up making a decent C+
Not my best test but at least I didn't fail lol
Thanks for all the replies
That cartoon thing would be true if I was trying to be a doctor for the money
But bio is just hard for me to understand because it is so random. Random mutation, speciation...**** like that...especially punnet squares! Punnet squares are not even facts, they are assumptions. Assumptions make me feel like every answer on my test could be right. Idk I'm more of a math/chemistry guy
OMG, after reading that sentence I just had a little post traumatic stress lmao. I was a nurse before I decided to pursue medicine and ALL our tests in nursing were exactly like that and you had to pick the BEST or prioritize your answer or else it's wrong and all the answers could work. It's one thing to memorize but it's another to take what you learn and apply it to a situation. It'll come with time my friend, just work at it. 👍
EDIT: A little trick I keep in mind when I take those type of test that ask to prioritize or best answer, I always try to think of my ABC. What do I wanna accomplish first that is absolutely important? For example burn patient with burns to the face and trunk, what do you assess first? Breathing.