- Joined
- May 5, 2005
- Messages
- 1,111
- Reaction score
- 48
Scenario 1: A 48 year old male is seen in the ED for headache. He is evaluated and discharged. While in the waiting room, he complains he has suddenly experienced significant back pain, and wishes to be evaluated again. The treating physician, however, decides not to let the patient check himself back in. Is this an EMTALA violation for not performing a "medical screening exam" on this new complaint?
Scenario 2: A 51 year old homeless male complains of chest pain, is evaluated, spends 24 hours in ED obs (including stress testing) and is discharged. Again, while in the waiting room, he wishes to check himself back in because his pain has worsened. The treating physician does not allow him to do so. If an adverse event occurs, has an EMTALA violation taken place?
I've had to consider both of these scenarios recently and was curious if anyone else had any insight. My gut instinct is a "no" for both.
Scenario 2: A 51 year old homeless male complains of chest pain, is evaluated, spends 24 hours in ED obs (including stress testing) and is discharged. Again, while in the waiting room, he wishes to check himself back in because his pain has worsened. The treating physician does not allow him to do so. If an adverse event occurs, has an EMTALA violation taken place?
I've had to consider both of these scenarios recently and was curious if anyone else had any insight. My gut instinct is a "no" for both.