Look, I'm not normally one to denigrate other posts, but I think this is a grossly inaccurate comparison of the two schools. First, ranking aside, Weill-Cornell is far more prestigious; the name recognition and its association with Sloan-Kettering (one of the foremost cancer research/care centers in the country) and the Rockefeller (said to have the highest concentration of Nobel laureates of any academic institution) are enough to trump NYU. Secondly, from looking over the financial aid packages of each school Cornell seems to offer the better deal; its grants tend to be larger, and expectedly so. Although NYU has a fairly decent endowment (a little over $1 billion), Cornell has more than double that. Finally, if you've actually visited and interviewed at both schools, it's glaringly obvious the facilities at Cornell are newer and prettier. I'm sorry but I think this is just a really silly thread. I don't know anyone who liked NYU when they visited (I thought it was abysmal) and Im thinking that most people who would make the comparison between these two schools were, in all probability, not offered an interview at Cornell. Yes, PBL vs. traditional curriculum is a completely legitimate concern and Im sure there are a couple of students every year that might consider NYU over Cornell, but I think these are fairly rare exceptions. Also, I am disgusted with this thread not because I went to Cornell undergrad; I would have replied in similar fashion if this had been a ridiculous comparison between Columbia and NYU or Cornell and MSSM.