- Joined
- Oct 7, 2005
- Messages
- 952
- Reaction score
- 0
Damn this thread is depressing. Maybe I need to take a harder look at this certain PhD program . . .
gujudoc said:So I don't think your situation characterizes all people. Honestly, while I don't know your situation, I have to wonder about people who divorce their spouses over something like this. Again, maybe because I'm from another country, I can't understand things. But in my culture, when they take the oath of for better or for worse, til death do us apart or the Hindu equivalent of it, it literally means just that in 98% of the cases.
Dr GeddyLee said:I've noticed some people knock on the "intellectual stimilation" and fullfilment motivations for going to med school, but for me that's the most significant reason I want to get into medicine.
I'm sure a lot of it depends on specialty. I've worked with many docs in diverse fields and many of them are happy and even excited about what they do. Personally, for me it's mainly imaging technology that turns my crank and I know I'd be happy in radiology (my office doubles as a reading room in the morning and I spend about 3 hours a day with a rad working next to me, so I have some small insight into the field).sacrament said:Do not go into medicine because you think it'll be "intellectually stimulating." That's one of the worst reasons, right along "because I'm gonna be rich, yo!" The bulk of your job in medicine will not be even remotely intellectually stimulating. And by "bulk" I mean almost all of it. I switched careers for the same reason and, hell, my old job was fairly intellectually stimulating (I was a research engineer). So I know what a cerebral job is, and medicine ain't it. Now, if you decided to go MD/PhD and focus mostly on research, with maybe some clinical work on the side, that'd be a different story.
Dr GeddyLee said:I'm sure a lot of it depends on specialty. I've worked with many docs in diverse fields and many of them are happy and even excited about what they do.
I think equating it with the "gonna be rich yo" is maybe a little bitterness from being in med school. I may be wrong, but to say that to someone who's worked in bioinformatics for 4 years is a little insulting.
Some do have excellent backgrounds in physics and contribute substantially to to imaging protocols and new techniques. No they don't have to in order to do diagnostics. Look up Scott Flamm with the Texas Heart Institute, a cardiologist I've worked with and someone who's been instrumental in developing cardiac MR.sacrament said:As an example of what I'm talking about, radiologists and rad onc people like to talk about how they need to have physics knowledge and training in order to do their jobs. That sounds quite intellectually stimulating. Physics! Well, I do have physics knowledge and training, at a graduate-school level, and while radiologists and rad onc folks do need a general understanding of a set of physics concepts, it is, comparatively speaking, a shallow understanding. It's what we covered in the first week. This isn't to knock them, it's just that they don't need an in-depth, PhD level of physics training in order to do their jobs, and most of them wouldn't want that anyway. A lot of radiology becomes pattern recognization, while the engineers designing all their cool-as-hell toys are the ones grappling with complicated whole-brain puzzles. The work in medicine just isn't "brainy" in the same sense that the true applied-sciences are. That's not to say it's worse or better... I, for one, have gradually realized that I don't really want "brainy" work anymore.
Dr GeddyLee said:Spend some time working with a rad or even cardiologist who's an expert in imaging physics and tell them their work isn't intellectually challenging or stimulating.
neurologist md/phd said "you'll make an excellent physician" and has offered to help me design a research project in his lab (hence the rat brains).
I've already had unsolicited offers for LOR. So I'm getting a much different vibe from these guys than I am from you (you are a med student, correct?).
Dr GeddyLee said:Some do have excellent backgrounds in physics and contribute substantially to to imaging protocols and new techniques. No they don't have to in order to do diagnostics. Look up Scott Flamm with the Texas Heart Institute, a cardiologist I've worked with and someone who's been instrumental in developing cardiac MR.
Dr GeddyLee said:You are a med student, correct?
Correct.sacrament said:And you're not even a med student, correct?
sacrament said:Back when I was trying to find a niche in medicine that worked the noggin', the chief of cardiothoracic imaging at my school told me that his job isn't "intellectually stimulating" per se. The residency director of the pathology department here said basically the same thing. Both of them love their jobs.
He's spent most of his career seeing pts but has published a few articles on anticonvulsants.An MD/PhD who does research. Isn't this exactly what I said earlier? I said it'd be a different story.
You're a med student saying "it's bad, bad, bad." I get it. I'm sure I'll file this somewhere in my mental rolodex of med school admissions (at the back 😉 )So doctors who know you think you'll be a good doctor and they recommend the field. That's great. I don't see how this, in any way, negates what I've been saying. You very well might make a good doctor and you very well might enjoy the career. I'm not going to even begin to dispute that.
Why should a med-student be qualified to convince anyone, anything about the practice of medicine? I bet I know as much about what goes on in a clinical setting as you do.I guess I won't try to convince you. Nobody can ever convince a pre-med of anything anyway. Everybody has to learn for themselves.
Dr GeddyLee said:I'm sure you, as a student, have seen doctors who are not happy and not all that smart and that scares you.
Dr GeddyLee said:Why should a med-student be qualified to convince anyone, anything about the practice of medicine? I bet I know as much about what goes on in a clinical setting as you do.
sacrament said:I have to wonder, if I'm so impressionable, why the doctors I've met who are happy and smart haven't swayed me over to their camp?! Maybe because I'm not a sponge who soaks up whatever emotion happens to sit next to me for three hours a day, but instead have gradually come to my own reasoned conclusions about things. My conclusion is that the majority of doctors who do primarily clinical work are not greatly mentally taxed on any given day. This is saying nothing about whether or not they like their jobs. And I suppose it's a relative thing, as I'm comparing the clinical work I've seen and experienced to jobs, research and individuals that I've seen and experienced in the past, and everybody has their own gauge of what constitutes mental stimulation. I stand by my opinion that people interested in clinical work should not expect the same degree of mental gymnastics that is experienced in research or engineering fields. Your own milage may vary.
Dr GeddyLee said:Oh, so now your comments are limited to PCPs? Nice change in tune.
Ok, so I've worked in a clinical setting for over 4 years @ 50 hours a week. I guess that makes us even in experience, as well as ego.sacrament said:I'm two rotations (and several months vacation) away from being an MD. I've worked approximately 80 hours a week, give or take, in clinical settings for almost two years. You've got quite the ego.
(Of course, a few months down the road I'll just hear "But you're just an intern" and then "You're just a resident" and then "You've only been an attending for a couple years, what do you know that the doctor who has an office next to me doesn't?!")
Well this conversation has reached the typical impasse where either the parties involved agree to disagree or don't agree to disagree but continue disagreeing anyway.
sacrament said:Uh, WTF? I said that where, exactly?
My conclusion is that the majority of doctors who do primarily clinical work are not greatly mentally taxed on any given day.
Dr GeddyLee said:Ok, so I've worked in a clinical setting for over 4 years @ 50 hours a week. I guess that makes us even in experience, as well as ego.
You really may take offense at the "but you're just a student" attitude, but honestly, do you think it's appropriate for you to make such sweeping jugdgements on the field of medicine as a whole when you haven't practiced a day in your life?
sacrament said:Working somewhere in a clinic where medicine is being practiced doesn't constitute "working in a clinical setting" except maybe in the broadest, most literal sense. If that were the case then the 70-year-old receptionist at my PCP's office would have us all beat.
As far as "last words" in a thread go, you should have left it at that. All hail the omni-sentient and all-knowing msIV.Yes.
Dr GeddyLee said:Little bit different working up brain perfusion, mr cardiac, and ct/pet fusion studies than answering at the front desk, wouldn't you say?
BTW, I've noticed in another thread you saying how much you hate med school and how you were "born to hate it." Maybe it's time to adress this transfer of agression onto others and realize not everyone is like you, not everyone is "born to hate" med school like you. But I'm sorry you're stuck in such a ****ty place, I would be pissed too being that far in debt to a place I was meant not to be.
NIce way to turn a little dishonesty into a semantic distinction. Maybe you are miserable because law is the field you should truly be in.sacrament said:I said I was going to let you have the last word, but I didn't mean just yet.
Because it's not the same as being a doctor. Neither is what you do.So... if your job is such a great immersion into clinical medicine, such a real clinical medicine experience... and if clinical medicine is indeed intellectually stimulating... then why are you, and I quote, "more miserable than ever?" You're right smack in the middle of what you crave! An unbridled mental workout!
I did not search though your posts, I switched over to the lounge for a second and saw the comment, which taken in context I think indicates a pattern.For one thing, it's creepy that you searched through my posts, and now not only do I think you're deluded, I think you're a weirdo.
Oh, is all this in silliness then? When you say "I wouldn't do it again" are we to take "I hate med school" as a bit of light whimsy? I hope for your sake that is true.Second of all, the Lounge is a place for over-the-top jokes and silliness and I enjoy how you completely took that quote out of the context. And finally, if the only people who ever gave advice about various experiences were the people who totally loved those experiences, then what would the point of advice be? Would SDN really be a useful tool for people if only the folks who absolutely adored medicine posted on it? In other words, why are you such a communist?
Dr GeddyLee said:BTW, notice this the "residents forum," not "med students." I assume when people ask residents if they'd do it again, they don't want to get a bunch of **** from disgruntled students.
Oh, is all this in silliness then? When you say "I wouldn't do it again" are we to take "I hate med school" as a bit of light whimsy? I hope for your sake that is true.
And there's plenty of residents that enjoy what they do and don't agree that it's so horrible. Much of it has to do with what type of person they are, what specialty they are in, what institution they work at, etc. That was one of my original points, that there are a variety of opinions on the subject, and that of an angry med student doesn't hold as much weight for me as the advice I've recieved from doctors who've been in private practice for years.sacrament said:There is plenty of "****" from disgruntled residents here, too. Why did you bother reading this deep into the thread if you think the negative comments in it hold no water? Why don't you start quoting one of the many other med students and residents on this thread who generally agree with me and start telling all of them they're full of sh1t?
I never took the POW comments literally, but it's obvious that you have a distaste for the field of medicine and that comment seemed a part of the pattern. I'm sure if I went to school to be a CPA I'd have something to say along the lines of "I'm the type of person that was born to hate accounting school," and it wouldn't be hyperbole at all.I wouldn't do it again. I'm not incredibly pleased by this career choice. When I go on a little jag about being "born to hate" medical school and that it's like being in a Vietnamese prison camp, then yeah Mr. Oblivious, it's a bit of silliness. Are you one of those people who require a 😉 after an outrageous comment in order to discern that it's outrageous?
I've worked with them, not just nearby them. I've played a pretty significant role in making our imaging center, IMO, the best in the state.sacrament said:I mean, you've worked for four years nearby doctors! What does anybody else know?
Dr GeddyLee said:BTW, I've noticed in another thread you saying how much you hate med school and how you were "born to hate it." Maybe it's time to adress this transfer of agression onto others and realize not everyone is like you, not everyone is "born to hate" med school like you. But I'm sorry you're stuck in such a ****ty place, I would be pissed too being that far in debt to a place I was meant not to be.
Hey Poety!Poety said:Thats great advice Lady and one not brought up a lot - how is the attendings life. Seems a lot of people don't realize just how bad an attendings life can be. My ob even told me, whatever you do - do NOT do obgyn because she said despite how much she loves it, it has consumed her life. (ofcourse with her new baby, shes hating that aspect right now)
To be honest, I probably should have done the NP route - set hours, no where near the amount of time devoted to education, etc - but I like you had a useless biochem degree, with a minor in philosophy! Now what would i have done with that 😳
billydoc said:Hey Poety!
Sorry to interject here. I'm an RN for almost 15 yrs now too. Do you really think that you would have been happier being an NP vs MD? I'm going qrazy trying to put the thought about med school to rest. Even though I understand that it's for status, and some delusional thought (in my case) that it will be "better" for me. But this med school keeps popping up in my head. Kind of "what if" I'll regret not doing it latter on in life? But on the other hand many ppl here already have said that they would not do it over, and are regreting doing it in the first place. Do you think you would've been as fullfilled by NP as you are by MD?
Thanks
Sanman said:I don't mean to interject, however having just started as a doctoral student, I can relate to both sides of the argument. In my opinion, the way you vuew these decisions changes as you do. Prior to entering grad school, my classmates and I loved the idea of becoming psychologists. We all had clinical experience and I personally worked along side many psychologists and graduate students. I have also worked long hours before, but we all still find ourselves a bit overwhelmed at times. Motivation is hard to find when you're up at 3 am sifting through 400 pages of reading so you'll know the most pointless details for the test tomorrow. At the moment, we're all hanging in there, but at what point does it become too much? The process may or may not be worth it to you. It all depends on how things end up. It is also important to remember that older docs aren't the best to ask about whether it is wortht because they tend to forget how tough it was after a while. Whether it will be worth will always change as your circumstances do. The happier you are in the future and you life circumstances dictate whether you will believe if it will be worth it. Though I have yet to see a medical student/ resident happy all the time. Pain is pain, the question how much are you willing to take to be a doctor. Perhaps those who had other viable options are a little more bitter than those who haven't.
Poety said:Excellent post - I concur, and as you can see, Im one of the
bitters right now 😳
gujuDoc said:Poety,
Quick question. With all this talk of NP vs. MD, where would you say PA fits into all this??? If it were NP vs. PA vs. MD, which of the three would you chooose?? Would you still pick NP, or would you pick PA? Why? Just curious.
Poety said:Hi Guju, unforunately I haven't had much experience with PA's at all so I could not answer this question with any substance. I did go to med school with PA's, and they took a lot of the same classes as the MD's - and a couple of them switched into the MD program afterward - but I have no idea what the difference would be since I've onlyh worked with NP's and MD's 🙂
Dr GeddyLee said:And there's plenty of residents that enjoy what they do and don't agree that it's so horrible. Much of it has to do with what type of person they are, what specialty they are in, what institution they work at, etc. That was one of my original points, that there are a variety of opinions on the subject, and that of an angry med student doesn't hold as much weight for me as the advice I've recieved from doctors who've been in private practice for years.
And I never said you were full of ****, only spewing it.
I never took the POW comments literally, but it's obvious that you have a distaste for the field of medicine and that comment seemed a part of the pattern. I'm sure if I went to school to be a CPA I'd have something to say along the lines of "I'm the type of person that was born to hate accounting school," and it wouldn't be hyperbole at all.
I'd like to see you retract your paranoid comments calling me a weirdo for searching your post history (which I did not), when the post in question is on the FIRST PAGE of the lounge. I don't think it's reasonable to assume someone is stalking you because they referenced a post that is on the FIRST PAGE of a forum.