- Joined
- Nov 28, 2005
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
I've known a few people and saw people on here who post really good scores (80-90 composite scores) from the recent PCAT. I notice that some of those people did real well in verbal and comprehension, but so-so in the math/science. How's pharmacy school going to look at that?
I happen to one of those people who did quite well in the math/science and not so hot in the verbal/comprehension but still mangaged to pull off a decent score. I feel for those people in the same boat.
My question is which applicant would the admissions officer pick? One who scored an 90 and got 99's in verbal/comprehension and 60-70's in math/science. or one who got 88's in math/science?
This is pharmacy school. The only parts of the PCAT that should really matter is the math/science. They should do something where they take the average of the math/science and then add that to the composite score. Then take the average. Just to be fair to those who aced the verbal parts of the test also. What you get from that should be the score THAT REALLY MATTERS. Anyone here agree with me?
DM
I happen to one of those people who did quite well in the math/science and not so hot in the verbal/comprehension but still mangaged to pull off a decent score. I feel for those people in the same boat.
My question is which applicant would the admissions officer pick? One who scored an 90 and got 99's in verbal/comprehension and 60-70's in math/science. or one who got 88's in math/science?
This is pharmacy school. The only parts of the PCAT that should really matter is the math/science. They should do something where they take the average of the math/science and then add that to the composite score. Then take the average. Just to be fair to those who aced the verbal parts of the test also. What you get from that should be the score THAT REALLY MATTERS. Anyone here agree with me?
DM