Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Interesting.
Started by Noyac
They're all certified badasses until they need a captain of the ship.....
And CO2 color change? No end-tidal? Did they not even have a vent? Sounds like a panic tube and BVM. Wonder if this was a total spinal and not just too much prop.
And CO2 color change? No end-tidal? Did they not even have a vent? Sounds like a panic tube and BVM. Wonder if this was a total spinal and not just too much prop.
This is what they call in the military a "Charlie Foxtrot" that resulted in a "FUBAR" situation!
That CRNA had not intubated a patient in 5 years.....wtf.
No wonder he/she didn't recognize an esophageal intubation.
No wonder he/she didn't recognize an esophageal intubation.
Bet this story isn't on the cover of nurse-anesthesia.org
D
deleted126335
Must be a mistake. According to the AANA surgeons are NOT responsible for the actions of a solo CRNA 😉
The co-defendant CRNA testified at his deposition that he was responsible for providing anesthesia to the patient, but that the insured was the “captain of the ship.”
Damn right under the bus
Damn right under the bus
how often do situations like this happen to real anesthesiologists?
At least once with Mrs. Rivers
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
"Lastly, call 911 immediately when a potentially life-threatening situation arises."
That's hilarious; when SHTF I'm supposed to call 911?
That's hilarious; when SHTF I'm supposed to call 911?
how often do situations like this happen to real anesthesiologists?
When covering 4-5 rooms I'd say once every 7-14 days; there are a lot of fires which need dowsing in the O.R.
The longer you wait to put out the fire the bigger the flames and the more likely the situation worsens:
I find that hard to believe. Even if you are doing eyes all day every day, aren't there some patients, that you just intubate? Sick heart patients, poorly controlled HTN. Those vitrectomy patients aren't exactly the healthiest, compliant patients.That CRNA had not intubated a patient in 5 years.....wtf.
No wonder he/she didn't recognize an esophageal intubation.
And when one intubates and thinks the tube is in the right place, but the sats remain in the crapper, and are unsure about lung sounds/color change don't you just remove and give it a second go?
I also like to listen to my own lung sounds. Learned the hard way.
I don't get it.
Anesthesia skills need to stay polished and active or they erode and become flabby. Even if you were an olympic athlete the fact is without exercise and a poor diet you could end up like this guy:
That looks like a fun patient to take care of. Guess I should have done derm. HAHA. You don't have to worry about the fatties trying to croak on you.
When covering 4-5 rooms I'd say once every 7-14 days; there are a lot of fires which need dowsing in the O.R.
My number is once every 5-7 days.
I do several patients like this every week for EGDs. That'll put hair on your chest........That looks like a fun patient to take care of. Guess I should have done derm. HAHA. You don't have to worry about the fatties trying to croak on you.
Oh gosh, what do they come in complaining of? Swallowing problems?I do several patients like this every week for EGDs. That'll put hair on your chest........
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
This CRNA sounds like my toddler. He can do it "all by myself" (my toddler's favorite phrase recently), but when he has done something wrong, suddenly his brother did it.
This had me chuckling. Nice one.Oh gosh, what do they come in complaining of? Swallowing problems?
Please explain to me why that is funny.This had me chuckling. Nice one.
Usually "abdominal pain."Oh gosh, what do they come in complaining of? Swallowing problems?
I also like to listen to my own lung sounds. Learned the hard way.
The only reason I listen to breath sounds is for quality (wheezing or rhonchi), not to confirm the tube is in the trachea. CO2 or direct visualization are the only ways I rule out esophageal intubation.
Cause hes fat.🙄Please explain to me why that is funny.
Still don't get it....🙁Cause hes fat.🙄
Two points (pet peeves of mine:
1. Often providers listen for BS on the chest (near the sternum) on both sides-BS need to be auscultated in the axilla! A goosed tube sounds great when listening at the costo-sternal borders
2. CO2 color change is glorified litmus paper-gastric air can change the color to yellow as well. This place needs capnography (time to join the 21st century!)
1. Often providers listen for BS on the chest (near the sternum) on both sides-BS need to be auscultated in the axilla! A goosed tube sounds great when listening at the costo-sternal borders
2. CO2 color change is glorified litmus paper-gastric air can change the color to yellow as well. This place needs capnography (time to join the 21st century!)
I can tell by the feel of the bag.
There is also the Cosham test. Apply negative pressure with a bulb attached to the ET tube. It reinflates if tube is in the trachea. Stays flat if tube is in esophagus.
ETCO2 trace trumps all. So does visual confirmation of tube in larynx.
There is also the Cosham test. Apply negative pressure with a bulb attached to the ET tube. It reinflates if tube is in the trachea. Stays flat if tube is in esophagus.
ETCO2 trace trumps all. So does visual confirmation of tube in larynx.
Two points (pet peeves of mine:
1. Often providers listen for BS on the chest (near the sternum) on both sides-BS need to be auscultated in the axilla! A goosed tube sounds great when listening at the costo-sternal borders
2. CO2 color change is glorified litmus paper-gastric air can change the color to yellow as well. This place needs capnography (time to join the 21st century!)
Great point on number two, particularly for residents.
Particularly if patients are being mask ventilated prior to intubation, you can get a color change. It has to be a sustained color change. I also once went a code where there was NO color change aka "please do better chest compressions, sir". So that little calorimeter is deceiving.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
The only reason I listen to breath sounds is for quality (wheezing or rhonchi), not to confirm the tube is in the trachea. CO2 or direct visualization are the only ways I rule out esophageal intubation.
I am going to have to redevelop habits when I start supervising. I rarely listen to breath sounds. I quickly glance at the tube depth marker as it passes the cords when intubating for measuring depth. Can tell by bag compliance if it's in if questionable. Not sure I would trust a resident or nurse though. A lot of things I do because I know my limitations but I'm not sure about others.
Unless gastric air has co2 from bmv, gastric air shouldn't have an acidic ph. Gastric fluid is acidic, but hydrogen ions are not volatile enough to change the litmus paper.Two points (pet peeves of mine:
1. Often providers listen for BS on the chest (near the sternum) on both sides-BS need to be auscultated in the axilla! A goosed tube sounds great when listening at the costo-sternal borders
2. CO2 color change is glorified litmus paper-gastric air can change the color to yellow as well. This place needs capnography (time to join the 21st century!)
D
deleted643396
Unless gastric air has co2 from bmv, gastric air shouldn't have an acidic ph. Gastric fluid is acidic, but hydrogen ions are not volatile enough to change the litmus paper.
What are you, some sort of scientist?
There is some CO2 in gastric air from swallowing air in the pharynx. That's why color change has to last over 6 breaths.Unless gastric air has co2 from bmv, gastric air shouldn't have an acidic ph. Gastric fluid is acidic, but hydrogen ions are not volatile enough to change the litmus paper.
All the tubes are always "visualized thru the cords". They somehow manage to "slip out". I have heard this story so many times. If I had a dime...ETCO2 trace trumps all. So does visual confirmation of tube in larynx.
Never trust stories of the tube being visualized when you are not doing the laryngoscopy yourself.
Video laryngoscopy is good for this. Everyone gets to watch.
All the tubes are always "visualized thru the cords". They somehow manage to "slip out". I have heard this story so many times. If I had a dime...
Never trust stories of the tube being visualized when you are not doing the laryngoscopy yourself.
Video laryngoscopy is good for this. Everyone gets to watch.
I agree. 95% of esophageal intubations had somebody see the tube go through the cords. If I don't see end tidal CO2 on capnography, seeing it with a video laryngscope for myself or a quick bronch are the only ways I believe it's in.
I can't tell if you are being serious or not.Still don't get it....🙁
What's funny about it is that the pt is fat and complaining of swallowing problems which obviously he or she doesn't have difficulty with since they are fat.
Thats funny.
I can't tell if you are being serious or not.
What's funny about it is that the pt is fat and complaining of swallowing problems which obviously he or she doesn't have difficulty with since they are fat.
Thats funny.
They just have a slow metabolism, it's genetic
Lastly, call 911 immediately when a potentially life-threatening situation arises."
That's hilarious; when SHTF I'm supposed to call 911?
The only reason to call 911 is when a paramedic can provide skills or equipment that are necessary and not available. It should happen exactly NEVER in an OR!
(Except when the skill is the humility to consider an esophageal tube in your differential...)
It is NOT funny. C level comedy.Thats funny.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I don't think this one story about one bad crna makes much difference. there are any number of equally bad anesthesiologists out there. anyway, what surprises me is that they moved to intubate so quickly because the guy didn't even have the skills to manually ventilate to maintain sats. if the paramedic was easily able to intubate, that means the airway probably wasn't too bad and at least ventilateable +/- oral airway; sounds like a stupid rush to intubate that cost the pt his life.
D
deleted162650
They just have a slow metabolism, it's genetic
I'm sorry but metabolism has nothing to do with it. They are just big boned.
I don't think this one story about one bad crna makes much difference. there are any number of equally bad anesthesiologists out there. anyway, what surprises me is that they moved to intubate so quickly because the guy didn't even have the skills to manually ventilate to maintain sats. if the paramedic was easily able to intubate, that means the airway probably wasn't too bad and at least ventilateable +/- oral airway; sounds like a stupid rush to intubate that cost the pt his life.
Swiss cheese model. There were any number of instances and opportunities that could have been used to easily avoid danger. Overtime they got to a fork in the road to rectify the situation they took the wrong road.
I will say that bad anesthesiologists exist, but I have never seen one that hasn't intubated in 5 years or needed to have EMS bail him out unless it was an emergent transfer, as I'm assuming this was.
As noyac explained, it was not a stab at you, rather a remark from chocomorsel whose irony I appreciated.Please explain to me why that is funny.
I will say that bad anesthesiologists exist, but I have never seen one that hasn't intubated in 5 years or needed to have EMS bail him out unless it was an emergent transfer, as I'm assuming this was.
yeah I get that, but that was part of my point - not intubating in 5 years doesn't matter as long as you can get o2 into the pt's lungs however you can. i'm surprised this guy's skills had deteriorated (if he ever had them) to the point he couldn't even mask ventilate; while it's plausible this particular pt was one of those truly impossible to ventilate types, those are so rare I kinda doubt it.
I don't know if you guys do the same HLC modules that we so, but I recently did the "bariatric sensitivity" one. This was almost verbatim one of the quiz questions:They just have a slow metabolism, it's genetic
T/F (the answer was of course true)-
"Many physicians believe that obesity is the cause of their patient's medical problems"
Intimating that physicians are INSENSITIVE and/or factually INCORRECT for believing this. I couldn't believe someone thought this was an appropriate suggestion! Any physician that doesn't counsel their obese patients on weight loss is negligent, in my opinion.
Are you obese? If so, I am sorry if I offended you.It is NOT funny. C level comedy.
But it was funny. Have a laugh.
The only reason to call 911 is when a paramedic can provide skills or equipment that are necessary and not available. It should happen exactly NEVER in an OR!
(Except when the skill is the humility to consider an esophageal tube in your differential...)
Need to transfer to actual hospital at some point.
I'm a simple guy. Even C level humor makes me laugh I guess.It is NOT funny. C level comedy.
I don't think anyone meant to offend anyone.
Not that I believe you are offended. You're probably just harder to amuze! 😉
Dead serious; too many 16 hour days in a row...I do get it now and it IS funny. Forgive my obtuseness.I can't tell if you are being serious or not.
What's funny about it is that the pt is fat and complaining of swallowing problems which obviously he or she doesn't have difficulty with since they are fat.
Thats funny.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Similar threads
- Replies
- 35
- Views
- 6K
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 2K