- Joined
- Nov 21, 2019
- Messages
- 767
- Reaction score
- 1,499
There are 3 aspects to this article that make me think he may be full of crap.I'm with you here, except that you accept the report of loosing a pint of blood every hour for several hours. Of course, if someone is loosing their entire blood volume in under 10 hours, IV fluids and watchful waiting are insufficient. But the outcome described in the piece seems incongruous with this. It looks like he got transfused one unit and was discharged the next day. If that's the case, then I don't believe he was actually bleeding as briskly as he thought he was.
Stated otherwise: I completely agree that we should not wait for someone with ongoing massive hemorrhage to fully decompensate before we take action. I think the author of this piece did not actually have ongoing massive hemorrhage.
1) Timeline. You touched on this. The guy bleeds on Friday evening, hemostasis achieved in the early hours of Saturday morning, and is discharged on Sunday. This is not the hospital LOS of someone who sustained complications such as worsening post-op MI, CHF, AKI, testicular atrophy, etc. from hemorrhaging shock. I suspect that these problems either pre-existed the bleeding event or developed months afterward. Regardless, it seems like he is overplaying the disability angle. More on that in point 3 below…
2) He directs most of his ire at the EP, but his outcome was driven by the GI and hospitalist’s alleged inactions. The EP was mostly guilty of a bad interpersonal interaction and I’m not ruling out a lot of shared responsibility. This is pretty classic - an IM trained guy wants to sue the EP but not his fellow internists with whom he hob-knobs in the lounge even though they were knee deep in the decision making.
3) Finally, the guy supposedly enjoys lecturing about his childhood PTSD according to the bio at the bottom of the article. That, coupled with this article being published in HuffPo, tells me a lot about the fragility and perpetual need for ego stroking of this individual. See point 1 above…