- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
- Messages
- 27,730
- Reaction score
- 51,505
It's an old saying. Does it hold up in the twenty-first century? Please respond to the poll only if you were a first time applicant in the cycle that ended with matriculation in 2016.
I thought it was 'Interviews four, you're in the door'. Or maybe 'Interviews five and you're going to thrive'? It's hard to tell which is correct when they all rhyme.
If you really sucked at interviewing, you'd have been turned down rather than waitlisted. Unless you are related to a VIP that no one wants to offend, it is most likely that you are second string when only the first string is able to take the field. I hope you have upped your game for this new cycle and you go on to victory!I attended 4 interviews and didn't get accepted anywhere despite being on three wait lists. Should I assume I suck at interviews?
While 3 interviews being the median for successful applicants, it varies widely
https://www.aamc.org/download/450608/data/msq2015report.pdf (p26)
2015 Matriculating Student Questionnaire (MSQ)
(https://www.aamc.org/data/msq/)
View attachment 207437
I believe it would be for MD and DO as per the first question in the poll. Grats on your acceptances.I'm assuming this poll is MD only? For my MD cycle, I went on 5 MD interviews before my first acceptance. Not sure if it's important though, but 2 of the schools specifically said they weren't giving a response until the new year, which was after I had gotten my first acceptance in December. I did, however, get an acceptance out of 1/2 of those schools in January.
Because they have two separate applications not to mention some fundamental differences in pedagogy.Also, why do we still have separate pre-allo and pre-osteo forums?
Ok then why include MD & DO in the poll option?Because they have two separate applications not to mention some fundamental differences in pedagogy.
@LizzyM @gonnif @Goro @gyngyn @Catalystik
What is the ratio of applicants to matriculants? Is it usually greater than 1? What about after April 30 deadline?
Haha yeah I think that's a typo. I'm almost certain he meant accepted students, not applicants.
@LizzyM @gonnif @Goro @gyngyn @Catalystik
What is the ratio of applicants to matriculants? Is it usually greater than 1? What about after April 30 deadline?
Ok then why include MD & DO in the poll option?
@LizzyM @gonnif @Goro @gyngyn @Catalystik
What is the ratio of accepted applicants to matriculants? Is it usually greater than 1? What about after April 30 deadline?
Ratio of applicants to matriculants at my school is >20:1. Ratio of interviewees to offers is about 2:1 (half of those who interview get an offer).
Because not everyone applies exclusively to either.Ok then why include MD & DO in the poll option?
Again - then why have separate forums?Because not everyone applies exclusively to either.
My bad accidentally forgot the accepted part
Is accepted:matriculant ratio > 1 even after Apr 30 deadline? So are underenrolled schools basically rare?
Again - then why have separate forums?
I don't know how each school does it. Some may be generous with the offers pre-Apr 30 and do a lot of praying that they don't end up over enrolled. Others may be stingy with the offers and depend on their high desirability and the waitlist to fill the class. I think that it varies by school.
Because unlike the 2nd law of thermodynamics, SND prefers order over chaos.Again - then why have separate forums?
This thread is just full of typos lol5 interviews, 4 interviews. The one I didn't get was my first one. I could tell it was rough and bought a book on med interviews after that!
Nobody has unfilled seats by orientation!So are underenrolled schools basically rare?
^ jealous of that 1.4% that miraculously got accepted without a SINGLE interview invite
that is about 170 people or, extrapolating to the whole applicant pool about 280. I wonder if that is mostly BS/MD joint programs?
I think my learned colleague meant "if you get an offer to DO or MD, a doctor you'll be!"
OR
"if you get an offer to MD or DO, into Medicine you go!"
I thought it was 'Interviews four, you're in the door'. Or maybe 'Interviews five and you're going to thrive'? It's hard to tell which is correct when they all rhyme.
I've seen some cases of "Interviews ten, apply again."
Judging by SDN I'd always thought it was something like "interviews nine, you're really just borderline"I've seen "interviews eight, you'll matriculate."
Judging by SDN I'd always thought it was something like "interviews nine, you're really just borderline"
I think the truth is you'll never feel secure about your chances of admission until you're actually holding the acceptance in your hand. Even though statistically I was more likely to get an acceptance than not, it didn't mitigate the feeling deep inside that I wouldn't get in anywhere. It's not something that can be assuaged with facts and logic IMO.
My brain is on summer mode!This thread is just full of typos lol
Didn't vote since I was a reapplicant, but I got 3 IIs and 1 acceptance.
On the note of the poll itself, if you're trying to figure out if 3 is the magic number, shouldn't "3" and "fewer" have been separate options?