Step I Is anti-HDV protective?

Started by willow18
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

willow18

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Robbin's Review says yes, Goljan says no. Tried looking it up and all I could find was this from the WHO.

Both humoral and cellular immunity are induced in patients infected with HDV.

These immune responses may provide protection from HDV re-infection, or simply modulate clinical symptoms. However, second cases of hepatitis D have not been reported.

Anti-HD antibodies do not always persist after acute infection is cleared. The serological evidence of past HDV infection is therefore not easy to demonstrate.
 
Hep D is a defective virus, requiring co-infection with Hep B in order to be infectious. When new virions are formed, they are composed of Hep D nucleic acid surrounded by Hep B surface antigen. Thus anti-HBsAg is protective from Hep D infection, not anti-HepD, whose usefulness is limited mostly to diagnostic purposes.