Is evolution a debated topic in the veterinary field?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
You're avoiding the question.
It says if your hand makes you sin, cut it off. Not if your hand makes you sin and then says it is sorry, just slap it a little and leave it attached.

I am not avoiding anything. Your hand is not going to say it is sorry. What Jesus was saying in this passage was, If your hand or eyes are causing you to keep from getting BORN AGAIN then you would be better to cut it off or pluck it out. Thats common sense.
 
What!!!??? How does sin=not being born again? I thought you took the bible literally. None of this is "common sense."
 
I am not avoiding anything. Your hand is not going to say it is sorry. What Jesus was saying in this passage was, If your hand or eyes are causing you to keep from getting BORN AGAIN then you would be better to cut it off or pluck it out. Thats common sense.

Nope, if you're going to take things literally, then take them literally. It does not mention being born again at all.
 
Pretty much every question in this thread that requires evidence or critical thinking has been ignored.

I love a good debate, but this isn't a debate. It's just aggressive ignorance.
 
Leviticus talks about it being okay to buy slaves from neighboring countries. I would prefer a Canadian, frankly. Forum member New Foundland will do. Or maybe Coquette.

Also, should I want to sell my daughters: http://bible.cc/exodus/21-7.htm

I just don't understand taking a LITERAL meaning from the Bible. It just doesn't work that way.
 
Leviticus talks about it being okay to buy slaves from neighboring countries. I would prefer a Canadian, frankly. Forum member New Foundland will do. Or maybe Coquette.

On her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura, which was posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative:

Dear Dr. Laura:

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. ......I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.

1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness - Lev15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?

6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination?

7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?

8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I'm confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

Your adoring fan,

James M Kauffman

Ed.D. Professor Emeritus, Dept. Of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education University of Virginia

(It would be a damn shame if we couldn't own a Canadian).


I borrowed that from someone.

I grew up going to church. I believe in God. I think the bible was written by man in a different time, but does have valuable lessons for us to learn as long as it is NOT taken literally. I also agree with earlier statements about problems with translation that make taking it literally an even bigger problem.

RackingHorse, I dont think anyone is trying to dissuade your belief, but try and look back at some of your posts, in the heat of the argument you've been inconsistent with taking things literally or not. I understand you are passionate about this subject, but are you fighting for an opinion that you were told was true, or have you studied for yourself? Have you read the bible on your own? Or studied ancient history?

What are your thoughts on mules? Are horses and donkeys descendents of the same species. Where do you draw the line on micro-evolution? Is it with humans only?

And here is the verse on dinosaurs:
Job 40:15- etc

15 “Look now at the 3behemoth, which I made along with you; He eats grass like an ox.
16 See now, his strength is in his hips,
And his power is in his stomach muscles.
17 He moves his tail like a cedar;
The sinews of his thighs are tightly knit.
18 His bones are like beams of bronze,
His ribs like bars of iron.

Its a description of some sort of animal with a huge tail like a cedar. Could be referring to a dinosaur...or large reptile...
 
Actually I don't agree with this statement. ***shocking*** That is because it can be observed!!!
I know, but I was speaking from how a creationist would see things. They can't disregard 'micro' evolution because it occurs within their life time, in that they themselves can observe it directly. 'Macro' evolution won't occur within their life time (though there's some species seemingly on the brink of becoming two) so they can just hand wave it away because they can't directly observe it without looking at fossils (which were, obviously, planted there by the devil. 🙄)


TO CLARIFY: NO, God did not make the world in 7 LITERAL days. If you have studied theology or the Bible at all, you would know that 7 days in God's time is not the same as 7 days in 2011. Just as the three wisemen did not arrive on the day Jesus was born to bring him gifts, but rather didn't meet him until he was at least a year and a half (making the trek from the Orient as they were). Not everything in the Bible is to be taken literally, because it was written SO LONG AGO and translated SO MANY TIMES.
Problem with this is if we can't trust the 7 days thing, how can we trust anything else in the bible? How do we know the entire thing hasn't been lost to translation, including the translation of the writers who supposedly got it from god? I think, instead, you (and others) have been subjected to the apologists who work to twist, alter, and revamp the wording of the bible so that it's still relevant in today's climate. People like to come back to that with 'well isn't that what science does?' which is correct, and the great thing about it, but then the bible isn't really based on evidence (aside from loosely historical, which is important in selling the lie [nuggets of truth and what not]) nor is it testable.

Also, I have been in college for 3 years now, so I have pretty well exhausted the facets of darwinis
Have you? Was it by just closing your ears and going "god did it god did it god did it" or did you actually have logical arguments and evidence? And if the latter, be sure to share so we can review them and point out any flaws (or be swayed by your insights, who knows).
 
Last edited:
man i'm gonna get so fat from all the :corny: that i've been munching... 🙄
 
Willfully sinning without repentance will cause you to go to hell!

"Truly I say to you, all sins shall be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they utter; 29 but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin" Mark 3:28-29

The only unforgiveable sin is either not having accepted God as your Lord and Savior, or denying him (denying that there even is a God who died on the cross to take the sin of the world). This translates into that if someone were to die today having either a) not accepted Jesus Christ for whatever reason, and/or b) believing and claiming that there is no Jesus/God/Holy Spirit etc., then they would definitely go to hell.

Otherwise, according to the Bible, as long as you believe and have accepted Jesus Christ, you will go to heaven. He died SO THAT we could sin and still get into heaven.....

"For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all." James 2:10

No sin is greater than another, therefore willful sin happens all the time.... I do it, you do it, we all do it. But it doesn't damn us to hell if we don't repent for every single thing we've done. I'm sure you will vehemently disagree, but that is the way I have been raised to believe.

My God, as I know him, is not the same judgemental, unyielding, hellfire and brimstone spewing as the one you're portraying. He knows I am human and selfish and imperfect but still loves me for who I am and who he made me, and I know for a fact that whether I have unaccounted for sin of whatever infraction when I stand to be judged, I will still inherit the kingdom of heaven.

Sorry to get religious, I'm really not that way normally, and I'm done with this thread. I respectfully agree to disagree with you.
 
Last edited:
Yah he's been having a terrible season.
 
What is this weird fascination with Tim Tebow? I don't get it.

From an attractiveness stand point, I don't understand either....

but the reason people really like him is because he's a really good person and that isn't seen very often in a professional athlete. Not to mention he's pretty much a haas. I used to talk **** about Tebow back in the day, but it was just SEC rivalry... then he got drafted to the Broncos and it was pretty apparent that people who hated on him were just bein haters because there's really nothing to hate on him for other than being a man with good character and moral fiber and an all around beast football player...
 
I can't speak to other's fascination with him, and it seems like most people just want to talk smack about him, but I think he's attractive, a good athlete in a sport I love and he comes across as a guy that cares about more than just the sport and making dollar dollar bills, y'all. I could be wrong, of course, but he seems like a genuinely good guy. And I think he's hot 👍
 
he comes across as a guy that cares about more than just the sport and making dollar dollar bills, y'all. I could be wrong, of course, but he seems like a genuinely good guy.

That's why I dig him and I'm pretty sure that's his general appeal to others as well... and maybe his looks too for some?

He's just a good guy... if you didn't watch football you wouldn't really know or understand but if you look into his interviews and record and stuff, it's hard to find much to dislike about him, as an athlete and an everyday guy...
 
Tebow sucks and I'm sick of hearing about how he just wins games despite being a horrible quarterback with horrible mechanics that will never get better. He may be an NFL caliber fullback or something, but not a quarterback.

Also, he's too in-your-face about his religious beliefs IMO. I'm sorry but to me, missionary trips to impoverished areas with the ulterior motive to convert people of other faiths to your own do not make one a "good person." Quite the opposite.
 
Also, he's too in-your-face about his religious beliefs IMO. I'm sorry but to me, missionary trips to impoverished areas with the ulterior motive to convert people of other faiths to your own do not make one a "good person." Quite the opposite.

With all due respect....

just because he's outspoken and unwaivering about what he believes in and uses his position of notoriety as a platform to witness to people who may have no idea what God is all about, doesn't mean he is overbearing about it or, "in your face" (as many other highly religious/conservative people are). He's not preaching or judging or getting in anyone's face for that matter about it, but simply trying to be a living example for the faith he associates himself with. He's just doing what the Christian faith says to do, and that is to be steadfast in your convictions and to be a Christ-like example at all times. Honestly, at least he has the courage to stand up for what he believes in, unlike a lot of other people who call themselves Christians yet do nothing to separate themselves from other people who don't affiliate themselves with Christianity (I will lump myself into that category if anyone is curious). The only reason he gets flack for it is because he's a young person who isn't like other young people nowadays. Not agreeing with his beliefs is totally fine, because that freedom to disagree is one of the great founding principles of this country... but he has every right to be outspoken about his faith and religious beliefs and I'm not sure why it bothers people so much other than that they're just not used to someone being outspoken about Christianity.

And the comment about missionary trips is a little offensive and condescending, because that's really minimalizing and incorrectly summarizing a mission trip. I've been on several and the core goal is ultimately to be a loving servant to others who are either less fortunate, or otherwise are not afforded that courtesy often in life, whether in a third world country or here in America. There is not an "ulterior motive to convert" people, it's not the Mormon Church nor is this 16th century Protestantism. Again, it's adhering to the Christian belief of serving and being a Christ-like example to an unbelieving world. Never, in all the mission trips I've been on, has anyone attempted to "convert" anyone nor has anyone I've ever known claimed to be a "good person" because of their missions and conversion efforts... you go on a mission trip because you have a heart for helping others.
 
Honestly, couldn't care less about his religious beliefs
.... Hey, sounds like he is a decent guy (not so sure about the looks)... But he is an NFL QB and he is well below average so I don't think he deserves the hoopla. Call me when he has done something.

I don't really like it when actors use their fame to espouse their political beliefs.
I don't really want athletes to tell me about their religious beliefs.

They have the right to do what they want, I have the right to ignore them.

I must admit though, at least he is not likely to shoot himself in the leg or sexually assault women.
 
Thought he was one of the dudes with crazy hair.

Disappointed to discover I was wrong. Boo.
 
I totally google'd the guy.

He looks like a rapist.
 
In any case, one thing I keep hearing more than I really am comfortable with is "we don't know why this happens". Seems to me that neither idea explains everything and the probable answer is there is a combination. The words "I don't know" are truly unacceptable in my former and future profession. Kind of evens the playing field with "It's a mystery".
 
In any case, one thing I keep hearing more than I really am comfortable with is "we don't know why this happens". Seems to me that neither idea explains everything and the probable answer is there is a combination. The words "I don't know" are truly unacceptable in my former and future profession. Kind of evens the playing field with "It's a mystery".

There's a pretty substantial difference between 'We don't know yet,' and "We don't know ever (or until the unicorn rapture).
 
The words "I don't know" are truly unacceptable in my former and future profession. Kind of evens the playing field with "It's a mystery".
Oh boy, you are going to have a tough time adjusting.
You better get used to using and saying " don't know", because in my experience in the health professions, that is used ALL the time.

I find it frustrating as a patient (human) and owner (pet) to hear those words so frequently, but that is life.
 
Oh boy, you are going to have a tough time adjusting.
You better get used to using and saying " don't know", because in my experience in the health professions, that is used ALL the time.

I find it frustrating as a patient (human) and owner (pet) to hear those words so frequently, but that is life.

you beat me to it! I'm now quite tempted to write "possible involvement of divine intervention" next time I'm asked for the etiology of something that's idiopathic or multifactorial and poorly understood. For the select set of clients, that may be the better answer. Just sayin...
 
the right to ignore them.

I must admit though, at least he is not likely to shoot himself in the leg or sexually assault women.

I believe I remember a Catholic church scandal that says religious people participate in terrible acts as well, but its okay, they can forgive it away.
 
In any case, one thing I keep hearing more than I really am comfortable with is "we don't know why this happens". Seems to me that neither idea explains everything and the probable answer is there is a combination. The words "I don't know" are truly unacceptable in my former and future profession. Kind of evens the playing field with "It's a mystery".
God of the gaps isn't a very convincing argument, essentially boiling down to "we don't know, thus god." Should, instead, be "we don't know, but we're going to work on figuring it out."

Oh boy, you are going to have a tough time adjusting.
You better get used to using and saying " don't know", because in my experience in the health professions, that is used ALL the time.
Especially in Pharmacology. Seems 1 out of every 5 drugs we learn we've little or no idea as to why they work. Levetiracetam: preventing convulsions through the power of nano-prayers.
 
Last edited:
The words "I don't know" are truly unacceptable in my former and future profession. .

Actually, admitting you don't know is one of the bravest, hardest things you can possibly do in veterinary medicine.
Diagnosing and treating a patient is easy. Telling an owner that you dont know what is causing their animals symptoms but wanting them to have faith in you, and treat the animal symptomatically, is much much harder!

Get used to saying I don't know, cuz your going to say it more than you think - or would hope you will.
 
I must admit though, at least he is not likely to shoot himself in the leg or sexually assault women.

Just as likely to do these things as he is to ever win an NFL playoff game (yes I'd rather have mongoloid concussed rapey Ben as the Steelers QB than him).

And libster, I don't think there is any shortage of people in this country who are outspoken about their Christian faith. Yet most of them do not come off to me the same way as Tebow.
 
You better get used to using and saying " don't know", because in my experience in the health professions, that is used ALL the time.

And, in fact, people who rarely admit to not knowing something fall very, very low on my trust index. I put a LOT of value in the advice of people who will say "I don't know" when they really don't know.
 
Going to have to respectfully disagree, Nyanko. He's overrated, sure, but I think he's got a crapload of potential and I think he's going to be a good quarterback in the next couple of years. Not nearly as awful as everyone makes him out to be. My $0.02, of course, and nevermind that Big Ben is my least favorite player in the NFL ever 😉

I don't agree with missionary work necessarily, and that's probably the biggest thing I'd disagree with him on. But his charitable involvements and good works that he's done/planned - most recently planning to build a childrens hospital in the Philippines - is worth more in my mind than worrying about what biblical verse he's got written on his arm.

Maybe this thread should be: "Is Tim Tebow a debated topic in the veterinary field?"
 
Going to have to respectfully disagree, Nyanko. He's overrated, sure, but I think he's got a crapload of potential and I think he's going to be a good quarterback in the next couple of years. Not nearly as awful as everyone makes him out to be. My $0.02, of course, and nevermind that Big Ben is my least favorite player in the NFL ever 😉

He won't plant his feet to throw when he's scrambling and he scrambles a lot. I think he's a great athlete but he just doesn't have a quarterback's set of skills. If the Broncos could keep up with running the option in the NFL for longer than 3 games before defensive coordinators figure out the cues, maybe he'd have QB potential. But I really do see him as better suited to a fullback position.

edit: evolution is a foregone conclusion - this is obviously a far more debated topic.
 
This Thread

500px-Train_wreck_at_Montparnasse_1895-728865.jpg


is going places 😎
 
. My $0.02, of course, and nevermind that Big Ben is my least favorite player in the NFL ever 😉
Sorry but Big Ben is miles away from Michael Vick as being most hated QB/player in my book.

Not to mention Vick ending up with a franchise that has almost as bad a rap as he does. Must admit he fits right in with the Santa-hating, battery throwing, turn on you on a dime Eagles fans (also beer dumping, ex-owner gambling away his fortune, etc etc).

I think I will concede there is no such thing as Evolution if Michael Vick is an example of it.
 
Not to mention Vick ending up with a franchise that has almost as bad a rap as he does. Must admit he fits right in with the Santa-hating, battery throwing, turn on you on a dime Eagles fans (also beer dumping, ex-owner gambling away his fortune, etc etc).
Who hates Santa and why? 😉
 
I don't remember the details (you can probably google it) but Eagles fans booed.threw snowballs at a guy dressed at Santa at a halftime show of one of the games many years ago.

I would too. Dude needs to be making me some gifts, not going to football games. Plus his reindeer were ****ting on the field.
 
The usual argument is that microbes can evolve to antibiotics, but people didn't evolve from monkeys.

Doesn't seem like a legit distinction to me, but that's what people stand by.

I know, but that is b/c people do not understand the definition of evolution.
 
Since I have been asked to provide documentation of scientists who are creationists I will do so. You may find further information at answersingenesis.org where this list was taken from. There are biographies present on the webpage if you doubt their credentials.

Dr. William Arion, Biochemistry, Chemistry
Dr. Paul Ackerman, Psychologist
Dr. E. Theo Agard, Medical Physics
Dr. Steve Austin, Geologist
Dr. S.E. Aw, Biochemist
Dr. Thomas Barnes, Physicist
Dr. Geoff Barnard, Immunologist
Dr. Don Batten, Plant Physiologist
Dr. John Baumgardner, Electrical Engineering, Space Physicist, Geophysicist, expert in supercomputer modeling of plate tectonics
Dr. Jerry Bergman, Psychologist
Dr. Kimberly Berrine, Microbiology & Immunology
Prof. Vladimir Betina, Microbiology, Biochemistry & Biology
Dr. Andrew Bosanquet, Biology, Microbiology
Edward A. Boudreaux, Theoretical Chemistry
Dr. David R. Boylan, Chemical Engineer
Prof. Linn E. Carothers, Associate Professor of Statistics
Dr. Rob Carter, Marine Biology
Dr. David Catchpoole, Plant Physiology
Prof. Sung-Do Cha, Physics
Dr. Eugene F. Chaffin, Professor of Physics
Dr. Choong-Kuk Chang, Genetic Engineering
Prof. Jeun-Sik Chang, Aeronautical Engineering
Dr. Donald Chittick, Physical Chemist
Prof. Chung-Il Cho, Biology Education
Dr. John M. Cimbala, Mechanical Engineering
Dr. Harold Coffin, Palaeontologist
Timothy C. Coppess, M.S., Environmental Scientist
Dr. Bob Compton, DVM
Dr. Ken Cumming, Biologist
Dr. Jack W. Cuozzo, Dentist
Dr. William M. Curtis III, Th.D., Th.M., M.S., Aeronautics & Nuclear Physics
Dr. Malcolm Cutchins, Aerospace Engineering
Dr. Lionel Dahmer, Analytical Chemist
Dr. Raymond V. Damadian, M.D., Pioneer of magnetic resonance imaging
Dr. Chris Darnbrough, Biochemist
Dr. Nancy M. Darrall, Botany
Dr. Bryan Dawson, Mathematics
Dr. Douglas Dean, Biological Chemistry
Prof. Stephen W. Deckard, Assistant Professor of Education
Dr. David A. DeWitt, Biology, Biochemistry, Neuroscience
Dr. Don DeYoung, Astronomy, atmospheric physics, M.Div
Dr. Geoff Downes, Creationist Plant Physiologist
Dr. Ted Driggers, Operations research
Robert H. Eckel, Medical Research
Dr. André Eggen, Geneticist
Dr. Dudley Eirich, Molecular Biologist
Prof. Dennis L. Englin, Professor of Geophysics
Dr. Andrew J. Fabich, Microbiology
Prof. Danny Faulkner, Astronomy
Prof. Carl B. Fliermans, Professor of Biology
Prof. Dwain L. Ford, Organic Chemistry
Dr. Kenneth W. Funk, Organic Chemistry
Prof. Robert H. Franks, Associate Professor of Biology
Dr. Alan Galbraith, Watershed Science
Dr. Paul Giem, Medical Research
Dr. Maciej Giertych, Geneticist
Dr. Duane Gish, Biochemist
Dr. Werner Gitt, Information Scientist
Dr. Warwick Glover, General Surgeon
Dr. D.B. Gower, Biochemistry
Dr. Robin Greer, Chemist, History
Dr. Stephen Grocott, Chemist
Dr. Vicki Hagerman, DMV
Dr. Donald Hamann, Food Scientist
Dr. Barry Harker, Philosopher
Dr. Charles W. Harrison, Applied Physicist, Electromagnetics
Dr. John Hartnett, Physics
Dr. Mark Harwood, Engineering (satellite specialist)
Dr. George Hawke, Environmental Scientist
Dr. Margaret Helder, Science Editor, Botanist
Dr. Harold R. Henry, Engineer
Dr. Jonathan Henry, Astronomy
Dr. Joseph Henson, Entomologist
Dr. Robert A. Herrmann, Professor of Mathematics, US Naval Academy
Dr. Andrew Hodge, Head of the Cardiothoracic Surgical Service
Dr. Kelly Hollowell, Molecular and Cellular Pharmacologist
Dr. Ed Holroyd, III, Atmospheric Science
Dr. Bob Hosken, Biochemistry
Dr. George F. Howe, Botany
Dr. Neil Huber, Physical Anthropologist
Dr. James A. Huggins, Professor and Chair, Department of Biology
Dr. Russ Humphreys, Physics
Evan Jamieson, Hydrometallurgy
George T. Javor, Biochemistry
Dr. Pierre Jerlström, Molecular Biology
Dr. Arthur Jones, Biology
Dr. Jonathan W. Jones, Plastic Surgeon
Dr. Raymond Jones, Agricultural Scientist
Prof. Leonid Korochkin, Molecular Biology
Dr. William F. Kane, (Civil) Geotechnical Engineering
Dr. Valery Karpounin, Mathematical Sciences, Logics, Formal Logics
Dr. Dean Kenyon, Biologist
Prof. Gi-Tai Kim, Biology
Prof. Harriet Kim, Biochemistry
Prof. Jong-Bai Kim, Biochemistry
Prof. Jung-Han Kim, Biochemistry
Prof. Jung-Wook Kim, Environmental Science
Prof. Kyoung-Rai Kim, Analytical Chemistry
Prof. Kyoung-Tai Kim, Genetic Engineering
Prof. Young-Gil Kim, Materials Science
Prof. Young In Kim, Engineering
Dr. John W. Klotz, Biologist
Dr. Vladimir F. Kondalenko, Cytology/Cell Pathology
Dr. Leonid Korochkin, M.D., Genetics, Molecular Biology, Neurobiology
Dr. John K.G. Kramer, Biochemistry
Dr. Johan Kruger, Zoology
Prof. Jin-Hyouk Kwon, Physics
Prof. Myung-Sang Kwon, Immunology
Dr. John G. Leslie, Biochemist, Physician, Archaeologist
Dr. Jason Lisle, Astrophysicist
Dr. Alan Love, Chemist
Dr. Ian Macreadie, molecular biologist and microbiologist:
Dr. John Marcus, Molecular Biologist
Dr. Ronald C. Marks, Associate Professor of Chemistry
Dr. George Marshall, Eye Disease Researcher
Dr. Ralph Matthews, Radiation Chemist
Dr. John McEwan, Chemist
Prof. Andy McIntosh, Combustion theory, aerodynamics
Dr. David Menton, Anatomist
Dr. Angela Meyer, Creationist Plant Physiologist
Dr. John Meyer, Physiologist
Dr. Albert Mills, Animal Embryologist/Reproductive Physiologist
Colin W. Mitchell, Geography
Dr. Tommy Mitchell, Physician
Dr. John N. Moore, Science Educator
Dr. John W. Moreland, Mechanical engineer and Dentist
Dr. Henry M. Morris (1918–2006), founder of the Institute for Creation Research.
Dr. Arlton C. Murray, Paleontologist
Dr. John D. Morris, Geologist
Dr. Len Morris, Physiologist
Dr. Graeme Mortimer, Geologist
Dr. Terry Mortenson, History of Geology
Stanley A. Mumma, Architectural Engineering
Prof. Hee-Choon No, Nuclear Engineering
Dr. Eric Norman, Biomedical researcher
Dr. David Oderberg, Philosopher
Prof. John Oller, Linguistics
Prof. Chris D. Osborne, Assistant Professor of Biology
Dr. John Osgood, Medical Practitioner
Dr. Charles Pallaghy, Botanist
Dr. Gary E. Parker, Biologist, Cognate in Geology (Paleontology)
Dr. David Pennington, Plastic Surgeon
Prof. Richard Porter
Dr. Georgia Purdom, Molecular Genetics
Dr. John Rankin, Cosmologist
Dr. A.S. Reece, M.D.
Prof. J. Rendle-Short, Pediatrics
Dr. Jung-Goo Roe, Biology
Dr. David Rosevear, Chemist
Dr. Ariel A. Roth, Biology
Dr. Jonathan Sarfati, Physical Chemistry
Dr. Joachim Scheven Palaeontologist:
Dr. Ian Scott, Educator
Dr. Saami Shaibani, Forensic physicist
Dr. Young-Gi Shim, Chemistry
Prof. Hyun-Kil Shin, Food Science
Dr. Mikhail Shulgin, Physics
Dr. Emil Silvestru, Geology
Dr. Roger Simpson, Engineer
Dr. Harold Slusher, Geophysicist
Dr. E. Norbert Smith, Zoologist
George S. Smith, M.S., Chemistry
Dr. Andrew Snelling, Geologist
Prof. Man-Suk Song, Computer Science
Dr. Timothy G. Standish, Biology
Prof. James Stark, Assistant Professor of Science Education
Prof. Brian Stone, Engineer
Dr. Esther Su, Biochemistry
Dr. Charles Taylor, Linguistics
Dr. Stephen Taylor, Electrical Engineering
Dr. Ker C. Thomson, Geophysics
Dr. Michael Todhunter, Forest Genetics
Dr. Lyudmila Tonkonog, Chemistry/Biochemistry
Dr. Royal Truman, Organic Chemist:
Dr. Larry Vardiman, Atmospheric Science
Prof. Walter Veith, Zoologist
Dr. Joachim Vetter, Biologist
Dr. Stephen J. Vinay III, Chemical Engineering
Sir Cecil P. G. Wakeley (1892–1979) Surgeon
Dr. Tas Walker, Geology/Engineering
Dr. Jeremy Walter, Mechanical Engineer
Dr. Keith Wanser, Physicist
Dr. Noel Weeks, Ancient Historian (also has B.Sc. in Zoology)
Dr. A.J. Monty White, Chemistry/Gas Kinetics
Dr. John Whitmore, Geologist/Paleontologist
Dr. Carl Wieland, Medicine/Surgery
Arthur E. Wilder-Smith (1915–1995) Three science doctorates; a creation science pioneer
Dr. Clifford Wilson, Psycholinguist and archaeologist
Dr. Kurt Wise, Palaeontologist
Prof. Verna Wright, Rheumatologist (deceased 1997)
Prof. Seoung-Hoon Yang, Physics
Dr. Thomas (Tong Y.) Yi, Ph.D., Creationist Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering
Dr. Ick-Dong Yoo, Genetics
Dr. Sung-Hee Yoon, Biology
Dr. Patrick Young, Chemist and Materials Scientist
Prof. Keun Bae Yu, Geography
Dr. Henry Zuill, Biology
 
Top