is FA GENERAL PRINCIPLES as bad as ORGAN SYSTEMS?

[rishi718]

everybody has concluded that the organ systems book by first aid was filled with errors, and there was this post to start errata

http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?p=8955102

but im hearing that the general book is actually amazing

does anybody have anecdotal evidence on these texts

i dont wanna loginto sdn next yr to find out that the new FA books have become the new staples replacing Goljan RR

(i say this because i just did a quick scan of all the First Aid's from 2006 til now, and lotsa things seem to go up n down each yr, it cant be that random can it. for example goljans path book had horrible rating until VERY recently)

---

Members don't see this ad.

 

[rishi718]

ill do you one better and ask if people know WHAT SECTIONS of general principles book were must read, and what were ignore

they discussed this when books came out: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?p=9030244

consensus was pretty much we should wait a year and see cus its too early

well its been a year....

it would be good to know if parts of these books, ie biochem, were sufficent enough, b/c it is subjects like biochem that are weak in fa, but have 400+ page review books. so something in the middle would be nice...