- Joined
- May 9, 2012
- Messages
- 151
- Reaction score
- 48
Is it such a crazy idea to be aiming to pay off our student loans within 3-5 years following residency?
We hear about the "crippling, life-long" debt we're incurring by attending medical school, but does it really need to be this way? I did some basic number crunching and here's what I've come up with:
Let's say you graduate medical school with $184,000 in debt (the average in 2014). You go off and complete a residency and fellowship lasting a total of seven years. During this time, you suck, and don't pay any of the interest that accrued on your debt, leaving you with a total debt of $292,000 at the end of your training (assuming a 6.8% interest rate). Let's assume, after taxes/alimony/child support/whatever, you're brining home 200k a year. If you contributed about 10k a month to your debt, you'd have that whole massive thing paid off in 3 years and be left with 80k a year to live off of.
Now I get it that 80k a year doesn't sound like much after 11 years of training, but its only for 3 years. You'd still be much better off than you were in residency. People across the country live comfortably off of this income (or less), so why can't we adopt such a plan? Obviously, in certain geographical areas, 80k a year is gonna get stretched pretty thin, especially if there is a family involved. But besides this, what are the other pitfalls in this plan?
(By the way, if you keep up with your interest during residency, the monthly payment would drop to less than 6k a month.)
We hear about the "crippling, life-long" debt we're incurring by attending medical school, but does it really need to be this way? I did some basic number crunching and here's what I've come up with:
Let's say you graduate medical school with $184,000 in debt (the average in 2014). You go off and complete a residency and fellowship lasting a total of seven years. During this time, you suck, and don't pay any of the interest that accrued on your debt, leaving you with a total debt of $292,000 at the end of your training (assuming a 6.8% interest rate). Let's assume, after taxes/alimony/child support/whatever, you're brining home 200k a year. If you contributed about 10k a month to your debt, you'd have that whole massive thing paid off in 3 years and be left with 80k a year to live off of.
Now I get it that 80k a year doesn't sound like much after 11 years of training, but its only for 3 years. You'd still be much better off than you were in residency. People across the country live comfortably off of this income (or less), so why can't we adopt such a plan? Obviously, in certain geographical areas, 80k a year is gonna get stretched pretty thin, especially if there is a family involved. But besides this, what are the other pitfalls in this plan?
(By the way, if you keep up with your interest during residency, the monthly payment would drop to less than 6k a month.)