Is it Time to Break with ABR?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Is it Time to Break with ABR?

  • Total voters
    87
  • Poll closed .
Old rad onc said:
350 is a median and average income. That will probably be a good number in the future. It is hard getting a job in California. Even locums is getting to be difficult. With 25% unemployment it is 7x the median income in the US. With round 2 of Covid coming, it's probably going to get harder on the job market! We will all be happy to have one........
Click to expand...

you heard the ASTRO president, just feel lucky you get A job. Feel lucky you even have A roof over your head
 
Can we refocus on the discussion of breaking from the ARB?

Clearly refusing to pay dues is one step, but how do we pull together all of the voices that need to be heard (academic leaders, private practice presidents, residents)?

We have so many exceptional people in our speciality that could help create a much more transparent, fair, and respected board. The ABR has slowly destroyed its own name - we do not need to follow them off the bridge.
 
Actually the voices are already heard.
It is unprecedented that the major org (SCAROP, ASTRO, ACR etc.) all came together and wrote a unifying letter ---> ABR.
When was the last time you saw that in the history? None.

I can sense the unhappiness (or anger) from SCAROP, ASTRO, ACR bc they see that their young grads' professional life is not taken seriously by ABR.

Actually breaking off is not a monumental undertaken, it has happened before in the history of ABMS.

The infra-structure is already there:
- The By-Laws
- The rules of governance
- The volunteers that write questions
- The volunteers as oral examiners
- The MOC system (OLA etc.)
- The annual dues

Size wise, we are the same size as neurosurgeons...That would give everyone a hint...

It is just a matter filing a divorce and move on. Life is better after divorce. We control our destiny...
 
fiji128 said:
About 18 months ago I was offered $250K at an academic center in a desirable location with no 401K contribution as a BC rad onc. And this was a 100% clinical type of position.
Click to expand...

Did they fill the position?
 
Neuronix said:
I know several places that have hired at this level and even less.
Click to expand...
I remember back when rad onc Step 1 scores were carved in stone and delivered by brontosaurus, the salary levels were about the same as now.
Sad! That essentially means in real dollars rad onc salaries have gone down over time. (This makes perfect economic sense BTW.)
 
Tigerstang said:
Did they fill the position?
Click to expand...

Just checking the website site now. Looks like they filled with someone who is a new grad (from at to 15'ish residency program) that went to undergraduate at the home institution. I'm somewhat familiar with the department/position as I have a local connection to the area and it basically fills with someone new every 2 to 3 years. It seemed to be a high volume low pay type of set up (with no rad onc residents) with note insignificant in patient call duties.
 
Last edited:
medgator said:
If someone is geographically constrained, very easy to believe. Think: much of Cali (desirable areas), Boston, NYC, wouldn't surprise me if sought after southern metros with a tight job market also fell into that category.

The pick 2/3 thing has always been true and geography and salary have always been the 2 big competing factors in any job.
Click to expand...
Can confirm: a nice metropolitan area in Cali and a "famous" academic center - offered $275K
 
RadOncLazers said:
Can we refocus on the discussion of breaking from the ARB?

Clearly refusing to pay dues is one step, but how do we pull together all of the voices that need to be heard (academic leaders, private practice presidents, residents)?

We have so many exceptional people in our speciality that could help create a much more transparent, fair, and respected board. The ABR has slowly destroyed its own name - we do not need to follow them off the bridge.
Click to expand...
yup peeps totally got off track
 
Again, the topic of the thread. What would be the next steps if we are considering a break from the ABR.

There are many other threads regarding how little we are reimbursed, young attending docs sacrificed, sky falling, etc.
 
radoncgrad2019 said:
have to imagine this is what GFunk offers to new PP people too in NorCal for starting salary

tough out there for a young'un
Click to expand...

Not quite, our base salary for shareholders is significantly higher than than that and doesn't include quarterly bonuses. One thing academic centers sometimes don't understand is that if you pay someone a flat salary with no incentivization whatsoever, you get what you pay for.
 
Gfunk6 said:
Not quite, our base salary for shareholders is significantly higher than than that and doesn't include quarterly bonuses. One thing academic centers sometimes don't understand is that if you pay someone a flat salary with no incentivization whatsoever, you get what you pay for.
Click to expand...

Maybe salaries have gone up then. I know someone who interviewed with the group not too long ago and was told 250k starting as a first year.
 
radoncgrad2019 said:
Maybe salaries have gone up then. I know someone who interviewed with the group not too long ago and was told 250k starting as a first year.
Click to expand...
$250-350k is probably as high as you'll see in most PP groups as a starting salary. Sweat equity
 
radoncgrad2019 said:
Maybe salaries have gone up then. I know someone who interviewed with the group not too long ago and was told 250k starting as a first year.
Click to expand...

Yeah, pre-partner salaries in the 250-300 range are normal, even for a PP without technical. Difference is in a PP when you become a partner (or shareholder) it shoots up, while in academics it will essentially be the same (maybe) until you hit associate prof.
 
evilbooyaa said:
Yeah, pre-partner salaries in the 250-300 range are normal, even for a PP without technical. Difference is in a PP when you become a partner (or shareholder) it shoots up, while in academics it will essentially be the same (maybe) until you hit associate prof.
Click to expand...

Yes I understand this. I was directly refuting GFunks claim
 
So if you are already ABR board certified in Rad Onc and you stop paying your dues, what is the actual consequence short term and long term? Any billing implications?
 
Nobody seems to be able to know what needs to happen to break off? Keep conversation on track please
 
ABR will probably send you a notification that you're not meeting MOC. Then, you can't mark "board certified" when you apply for hospital privileges.

Phantom1 said:
So if you are already ABR board certified in Rad Onc and you stop paying your dues, what is the actual consequence short term and long term? Any billing implications?
Click to expand...
 
Which other specialty has broken off? It might be helpful to investigate the route and steps they took.
 
Does anybody know leadership for plastic surgery or IR who works with / for their overseeing board?

Might be worthwhile discussing a course of action.
 
THE Mike Steinberg has some Big Deal Opinions about this topic (and this is from ROHub, but that place is basically North Korea so here are some screenshots via Twitter).

The highlights:
1) Stop being so mean to Paul Wallner, DO!!!
2) The decision by ABR to do virtual exams has nothing to do with the uproar by literally everyone in the RO and rads community
3) Hand-waving about trust from "the public" and Angoff methods and how 80 staff members are needed to certify ~200 residents a year
4) Falling interest in the specialty predated 2018 board exams, so... we need to find out why students don't want pursue RO [Ed: job market?]
5) "Anonymous student blogs" are a problem [is SDN a blog?]



1.jpeg
2.jpeg
3.jpeg
 
Steinberg with the stereotypical, old white man circling of the wagons in response to 1) valid criticisms of the board and 2) a repudiation of another old white man doing insensitive **** that old white men (or really any group) can no longer get away with in the current era.

Old white men are going to old white man is my overall response to this.

It's a lot of words that just goes "I DONT LIKE CHANGE LALALALALA" with fingers in the ears.

Sometimes our oldest members are simultaneously the most childish. Surprised that UCLA is still rocking the "crotchety old white male" stereotype as their chair.
 
"A prominent radiation oncologist just said the ~5000 practicing radiation oncologists in the US aren't a big enough group to have their own fully functioning and well-respected specialty board." - The ~3700 members of the American Board of Neurological Surgeons

"If you're explaining, you're losing." - Ronald Reagan

FINALLY...
"I do not have a time limited certificate, but I do participate in all aspects of MOC."
NO.
This is the ultimate non sequitur when you really think about it. You do not participate in the part where there are ramifications of failing in MOC requirements, so you do not participate in all aspects... you exclude yourself from the most important aspect: punishment. It's like a cancer cell saying "I have genes that allow me to replicate indefinitely, but I still maintain all the other normal genes that don't." Or worse: "I live in a racist society, but all of my friends are black."
 
Last edited:
It is a very interesting post by Dr Steinberg. Let us break it down:

1) he comes to the defense of his fellow fat cat corrupt buddy at 21C oncology. Both have made millions, selling out pps to greedy people
2) he gets paid 1 million to be chair, probably feels the pitchforks poking his butt
3) he holds an unlimited certificate but certainly feels you should be held to a different standard
4) the ABR is a bloated bureaucracy with tons of fat cats which would lose their jobs if we break away. Do we really need that much lard?

what we have is an entrenched white man coming to the defense of a system that actively empowers him. He goes to the secret handshake country club and eats Paul Wallner’s Kentucky derby pie and his mom’s “closely guarded” chocolate mint brownies. He sees the current discussion as a threat to himself, his buddies and the system that empowers them and will actively work to crush any dissenters.

the wagons are circling. The best is yet to come.
 
Last edited:
Ahhh, this guy says the ABR is perfect and anyone who says otherwise is "fake news". He knows his audience: highly educated people tend to respect and adore a bully who claims to be a victim
 
His use of "ad hominem attack" bothered me as well. It's not an ad hominem attack. He's just being attacked for being an out-of-touch jerk, on this and other "anonymous student blogs."

TL;DR ok boomer
 
thecarbonionangle said:
It is a very interesting post by Dr Steinberg. Let us break it down:

1) he comes to the defense of his fellow fat cat corrupt buddy at 21C oncology. Both have made millions, selling out pps to greedy people
2) he gets paid 1 million to be chair, probably feels the pitchforks poking his butt
3) he holds an unlimited certificate but certainly feels you should be held to a different standard
4) the ABR is a bloated bureaucracy with tons of fat cats which would lose their jobs if we break away. Do we really need that much lard?

what we have is an entrenched white man coming to the defense of a system that actively empowers him. He goes to the secret handshake country club and eats Paul Wallner’s Kentucky derby pie and his mom’s “closely guarded” chocolate mint brownies. He sees the current discussion as a threat to himself, his buddies and the system that empowers them and will actively work to crush any dissenters.

the wagons are circling. The best is yet to come.
Click to expand...

I demand a podcast with Wallner, Steinberg, and Weichselbaum. We could call it "Old Men Yell at Clouds". There could be a rotating 4th chair of younger, more progressive docs for them to demean and belittle. Season 1, Episode 1: "How can we increase diversity in Radiation Oncology". Instant hit.
 
What exactly was the removed ROHUB post he referenced which sparked the official ASTRO doctrine of “you better stfu or we will crush you, pulverize you. Be “professional”” ? Did anybody catch it?
 
thecarbonionangle said:
What exactly was the removed ROHUB post he referenced which sparked the official ASTRO doctrine of “you better stfu or we will crush you, pulverize you. Be “professional”” ? Did anybody catch it?
Click to expand...
I did. By a guy who's first name is short for "simulation" 🙂
It was a totally reasonable post, as usual.
 
Appears ROHub might be deleting some posts? Shows these posts in the preview area, but when you click on the thread itself, the 3 posts noted here are no-where to be found.

1593028166510.png


This is your friendly reminder that at SDN, all opinions are welcome, and we will not gaslight those who have a differing opinion of us of being menaces and thus delete all your posts. Those who have had posts deleted at ROHub, we would be happy to discuss the merits of your thoughts on SDN in further detail if you would like to continue the discussion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

fiji128
2025 ABR Oral Exam Results
Replies
49
Views
5K
ramsesthenice
R
J
ABR resources
Replies
4
Views
2K
MudPhud20XX
MudPhud20XX
N
Failed Oral in April this year and ABR feedback letter includes wrong name
Replies
13
Views
2K
Gfunk6
Gfunk6
R
Radiobiology - ABR history
2 3
Replies
103
Views
9K
evilbooyaa
evilbooyaa
N
ABR Radbio/Physics passing score thresholds [Resurfacing the discussion]
Replies
17
Views
4K
Neuronix
Neuronix
Top