justification for lockdowns, mandates, vaccine research and development

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.

LineAndBerry

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
89
Reaction score
149
If Ivermectin Recognized, Justification for Lockdowns and Vaccine Mandates Would Evaporate: Doctor

By Harry Lee and Nicholas VandenNieuwenhof

January 19, 2022


"Federal health agencies haven’t recognized ivermectin as an effective treatment for COVID-19 patients. According to Doctor Leland Stillman, the reason is more political than scientific, because otherwise there would be no basis for lockdowns or vaccine mandates.

“If ivermectin were recognized by the public health and academic establishment as the drug that it is, that treats acute viral illnesses, one of which is COVID-19, the entire justification for lockdowns, mandates, let alone vaccine research and development would evaporate overnight,” Stillman told The Epoch Times in a recent interview.

According to Section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (pdf), the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) can only issue emergency use authorization if certain criteria are met, including “there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product.”

So if there’s an approved alternative, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—an agency in HHS—can’t issue emergency use authorization for COVID-19 vaccines.

Stillman said it’s not a conspiracy theory or even an isolated opinion that ivermectin works for treating COVID-19, because tens of thousands of physicians all over the world have recognized its effectiveness…...."
 
If Ivermectin Recognized, Justification for Lockdowns and Vaccine Mandates Would Evaporate: Doctor

By Harry Lee and Nicholas VandenNieuwenhof

January 19, 2022


"Federal health agencies haven’t recognized ivermectin as an effective treatment for COVID-19 patients. According to Doctor Leland Stillman, the reason is more political than scientific, because otherwise there would be no basis for lockdowns or vaccine mandates.

“If ivermectin were recognized by the public health and academic establishment as the drug that it is, that treats acute viral illnesses, one of which is COVID-19, the entire justification for lockdowns, mandates, let alone vaccine research and development would evaporate overnight,” Stillman told The Epoch Times in a recent interview.

According to Section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (pdf), the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) can only issue emergency use authorization if certain criteria are met, including “there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product.”

So if there’s an approved alternative, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—an agency in HHS—can’t issue emergency use authorization for COVID-19 vaccines.

Stillman said it’s not a conspiracy theory or even an isolated opinion that ivermectin works for treating COVID-19, because tens of thousands of physicians all over the world have recognized its effectiveness…...."

I wish I could not believe someone with a brain could post this. Alas here we are.

Ivermectin isn't recognized as an effective treatment for COVID-19 patients because it is NOT an effective treatment. It's actually that simple. And despite RFK Jr's antivax stupidity, having a ****ty treatment for a disease would not preclude emergency authorization of a vaccination. Vaccinations and treatments are different.

Also the source of the article, The Epoch Times, has been labeled a global scale misinformation machine and among other things was/is a huge fan of QAnon stupidity. Linking almost anything from there is a big flashing sign that you don't actually care to be correct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top