Longtime lurker, but I made an account to post here, because this thread makes me really sad.
I just graduated from a county based 4 year EM program and am staying on as faculty, and I would reprimand the crap out of any of my resident or colleagues I heard talk this way about patients.
Yes, our jobs are frustrating, but y'all CHOSE (as I did) a specialty where we take care of the vulnerable, the challenging, the homeless, the addicted, the abused, and the needy patients. Our patients are not easy, and y'all are insane for wanting to apply a medical algorithm to try to fix everything.
Have you never spent time with the patient who "just wanted food" to find out they were being abused at home?
Have none of you had an addict that decided to give suboxone a chance and is now living a better life?
Have you not had a patient that was screaming wildly in a psychotic episode, only to wake up from their haldol/ geodon coma and talk about how scared their delusions make them?
It's really not that hard to treat the whole patient, find out if the need a place to sleep, if they are safe, if they need help with their immigration status, or if they just need someone to treat them like a person and look them in the eye instead of just stepping over them all day on the street.
Yes, it seems more "badass" to just discharge a patient who is asking for a 4AM sandwich in <10 minutes, but doing that is not what what my friends who are EM doctors do. To me, an EM doctor finds out if that person needs meals on wheels, that they don't know that they qualify for food stamps, that they can come to the ER to get HELP.
People come to us because they need HELP, and y'all seem surprised that we take care of a needy, underserved, and somewhat challenging population.
I applaud your idealism. I think we all start out with a healthy dose of it and need to hold on to at least a spark of it, no matter how frustrating out jobs can get. And you're right, no one should take out their frustrations with the system on a patient. Ever. But let me ask you a question. Which did you see as your role in the ED?
A. To treat and stabilize patients critically ill and injured patients,
B. To maximize revenue for administrators or shareholders, focusing on pleasing "customers" who aren't critically ill or injured,
C. To treat chronic, non-emergency social ills, or
D. Create data for the government to track.
You're right, this thread is sad. It real, real sad. And I'll tell you why. It's because we went into emergency medicine hoping to treat critically ill and injured patients. We soon realize that all anyone cares about other than us (and nurses) is to maximize revenue for the hospital administrators or shareholders. Then, although 99% of you is dedicated in your heart to emergency care, you realize those in charge care about nothing but extracting money from the walking well, and expect you to spend 98% of your time doing B, C and D, no matter how little time that leaves for A. "And by the way, don't forget about those 'emergencies,' too, guys."
It's pretty soul crushing for a lot of people when that cognitive dissonance hits, that the people who care about the primary mission of the ED, caring for the critically ill and injured, aren't in charge and never will be, and that the people who are in charge, don't even care a lick about the tsunami current of emergencies, chronic social ills and data collection you're swimming upstream to tackle, as they heap more and more demands to extract maximum revenue from the walking well, not to benefit the critically ill and injured, not to treat those with chronic social ills, not to benefit you, but to benefit
them.
"Make us money, make those 'customers' happy. The emergencies, the chronic social ills, the data collection? That's your problem Mr. Smarty Pants with the white coat and degrees on your wall. Not enough time? Tired? Stressed? Suck it up Buttercup and figure out a way to do it all, and don't let it get in the way of Our Money," so says the Administrator.
None of that makes you sad, just the people on this thread?