- Joined
- Jun 11, 2010
- Messages
- 75,578
- Solutions
- 2
- Reaction score
- 121,464
- Points
- 13,076
- Location
- Somewhere west of St. Louis
- Non-Student
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
These threads are pointless
These responses are immature.These threads are pointless
These responses are immature.
Only when people harp about how "MDs can't go into academic medicine."Should we start posting all the MDs who hold academic positions? I guess if these little quips make you feel better about yourself
Should we start posting all the MDs who hold academic positions? I guess if these little quips make you feel better about yourself
Only when people harp about how "MDs can't go into academic medicine."
No, I'm able to maintain my self esteem without throwing out a negative and pointless opinion where I could have just moved on. I do, however, enjoy pointing out when others leave a slime trail on the low road.Should we start posting all the MDs who hold academic positions? I guess if these little quips make you feel better about yourself
What! Is she? Maybe being around Latinas has given me a new definition of 'hot'...Wow she's a really hot...
...passion for Molecular and Cellular Principles as well as incorporating laboratory medicine content in an active learning environment and the potential this holds for improving patient care.
Idk but I always thought DOs can and do get into academic medicine (and quite regularly too). If anything, I’m actually really surprised that there’s actually a belief that DOs can’t go into academic medicine. That’s one myth I didn’t encounter before.
Eh it depends on what you mean by "academic medicine" whether or not its true. Academics is a very broad term and can mean a bunch of different things to different people.
No, I'm able to maintain my self esteem without throwing out a negative and pointless opinion where I could have just moved on. I do, however, enjoy pointing out when others leave a slime trail on the low road.
Of course DOs can go into academic medicine. But its mostly MDs. DOs are much less focused (on average) in research in general, go to more community based residencies, oh and theres WAY more MDs in every field of academic medicine because theres just way more MDs period.
When you consider the above, especially the last point, its no surprise DOs are a minority in academic medicine compared to our MD counterparts.
Of course DOs can go into academic medicine. But its mostly MDs. DOs are much less focused (on average) in research in general, go to more community based residencies, oh and theres WAY more MDs in every field of academic medicine because theres just way more MDs period.
When you consider the above, especially the last point, its no surprise DOs are a minority in academic medicine compared to our MD counterparts.
100% agreed.
DOs are in the minority of physicians and tend to have careers focused more on community medicine than academics and research. I think it’s unfair when we act shocked when a DO does end up in academic medicine— there’s no reason it shouldn’t be possible— but it’s equally unfair to act like it isn’t an achievement at all when DOs as faculty in allopathic institutions aren’t exactly commonplace. We don’t have to laud it like she cured cancer or hung the moon, but props for an impressive career trajectory are well deserved.
Should we start posting all the MDs who hold academic positions? I guess if these little quips make you feel better about yourself
Only when people harp about how "MDs can't go into academic medicine."
Somebody gets the point I was trying to make!Of course DOs can go into academic medicine. But its mostly MDs. DOs are much less focused (on average) in research in general, go to more community based residencies, oh and theres WAY more MDs in every field of academic medicine because theres just way more MDs period.
When you consider the above, especially the last point, its no surprise DOs are a minority in academic medicine compared to our MD counterparts.
SDN and the internet being what they are, I'd recommend picking a less inflammatory tagline next time-- it wouldn't be a message board if we didn't all overreact! But yes, see your point.Somebody gets the point I was trying to make!
Ditto Ornatkas.
And others
Some SDNers get lost in pedanticism, alas. Not you!!!SDN and the internet being what they are, I'd recommend picking a less inflammatory tagline next time-- it wouldn't be a message board if we didn't all overreact! But yes, see your point.
Somebody gets the point I was trying to make!
Ditto Ornatkas.
And others
Some SDNers get lost in pedanticism, alas. Not you!!!
Only when people harp about how "MDs can't go into academic medicine."
Indeed, and I think it's worth tooting the horn for the profession every now and then. I also believe it's better to light a candle than curse the darkness.There are some very famous DOs in the world of academic medicine. Even at places like MGH (Such as Dr. Michael Jaff, a world renowned cardiology researcher who is now the president of a Harvard-affiliated hospital). But these are the exceptions to the rule.
Negative. There can be no positivity. Each thread must be over-analyzed to the point that it’s no longer fun or uplifting. After all, premeds might stumble in and be duped into thinking there’s anything to look forward to and it is our (gracious and righteous are we) responsibility to make sure they’re ***informed***.Indeed, and I think it's worth tooting the horn for the profession every now and then. I also believe it's better to light a candle than curse the darkness.
What are you actually asking?"In 2017 Dr. Zepf was recognized by the American Medical Association as an Inspirational Physician in the Women Physicians Section (WPS)"
Why does the AMA have a "Women Physicians Section" for inspirational physicians? Is being an inspirational physician like a strength-based sport that requires two separate leagues for men and women?
I'm pretty sure you know what he is saying.What are you actually asking?
There are several possible interpretations based on the wording and I’d like clarification.I'm pretty sure you know what he is saying.
There are several possible interpretations based on the wording and I’d like clarification.
@Osminog is saying "Why do women get a special women category? Are they biologically disadvantaged when it comes to medicine in the same way they are in sports?"
Making an issue out of a non-issue imo. Also, for as much as he talks about the biological aspect of things like intelligence, you think he'd recognize that women in medicine have challenges different than men due to their biology (getting pregnant and all) and having a "women physicians section" is an attempt to recognize these differences in the challenges they face while doing no harm to anyone. There's also the whole thing where people tend to look up to others who are like themselves in whatever categories they use to define their person, be it male, female, trans, Hispanic, black, white, etc.
Physicians are only as good as the services they provide. Instead of dwelling on identity politics, we should be rewarding excellence and talent.
By analogy, a restaurant owner's personal struggles aren't going to improve food quality, service, and reasonableness of prices. Her being pregnant, divorced, injured, etc., isn't going to fill seats. Hungry customers, like desperate patients, don't care about what's between your legs.
Once “identity politics” is uttered I sort of zone out 🙄I'm going to be very blunt here, you're missing the point and this post makes you sound very out of touch.
I also wonder how much you can actually speak to this topic as a pre-med.