benefit_sf
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2019
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 5
Last edited:
The issue is they are selecting basically 100-200 from a pool of thousands, so they need a way to standardize the process to make it fair. It's not so much score cut-offs, but rather assigning scores to various elements in an application so they can make (hopefully) consistent decisions across thousands of applicants over several months. Letters of interest don't supersede anything else in an application, but they obviously play some role at schools that actively encourage them (i.e., a really great LOI is not going to matter for an applicant that wasn't going to get an A anyway, but the absence of one could hurt someone who might have otherwise received an A at a school that likes to see them).so do they play any role at all, or is just a nicety? i'm also surprised the process doesn't seem discussion-based on overall impressions, more so based on score cut-offs.
I'm not an adcom, so one of them can definitely give you a more authoritative response.Thanks for the insight! Do you think there's still discussion about applicants regardless of score, or they only discuss the interviewees with a high enough result?
did you also get the sense that NYU pretty much only goes by MMI score?
“How are LOIs worthless? Do they just hold no weight whatsoever/not get read usually?”Seems like many schools decide based on applicant rating, (with some schools saying MMI is an important part of it). If so, how do soft aspects such as an applicant's expressed interest in post-II letters (LOInterest) play a role if at all?