Just realized the other day, as I was talking to the DO that's going to be writing my letter, that it's not going to have anything about the 'osteopathic philosophy' in it, or my suitability for it..
The doc is a pathologist that doesn't incorporate any OMM into her practice (surprising, I know...). When asked why I was going the D.O route, I told her that I wasn't invested in either route, I wanted to practice medicine and I didn't see a functional difference between D.O and M.D.
Her response: "Yeah. Honestly, a doctor's a doctor's a doctor."
Neither of the D.O's I've shadowed (orthopod, pathologist) have really touted/differentiated the "D.O philosophy" from allopathy, or made it seem like it affected their practice at all. I started out sold on osteopathy as more holistic/person-centered/different from allopathy, but if anything the D.O's I've shadowed have totally convinced me otherwise.
I'm sorta worried that schools that seem pretty high on the "D.O philosophy" (Western, for one) will view this as a weakness in my app..
I mean, if my answer to "Why D.O?" is "Because I want to practice medicine, I identify with your school's mission statement, and you have a program specific to my region that makes me giddy just thinking about it" (NW track), and don't mention "The healing touch" or OMM, will I be sunk?