If you go to the PharmCAS website, they have a link to the PharmCAS application instructions. Scroll down near the bottom to the section "Letter of Reference". They sort of show you the form that the evaluator must fill out so you can look at it.
yeah once it's submitted, it should process as received. Actually if i remember correctly, if it still says "new", it means your professor hasn't even opened the email yet. I'm not 100% sure, but that's what i remember.
I see some schools (ie. University of the Pacific) REQUIRE a letter of reference from a pharmacist? So that means even though I have 1200 hours of health care experience as a nursing student (that actually beyond the scope of practice of a pharm tech) and a 3.8 GPA that I'm not even eligible to apply? That's crazy.
I see some schools (ie. University of the Pacific) REQUIRE a letter of reference from a pharmacist? So that means even though I have 1200 hours of health care experience as a nursing student (that actually beyond the scope of practice of a pharm tech) and a 3.8 GPA that I'm not even eligible to apply? That's crazy.
I don't really understand this either. I can see making it an option, not a requirement. Not everyone that goes to Pharmacy school has pharmacy experience.
Just like 311fighters has said, having nursing experience doesn't necessarily make you ready to go into pharmacy. Hell, if you changed your mind after 1200 hours of nursing, what makes you feel ready to switch over to pharmacy without even speaking with a pharmacist, much less actually working within one?
The way I see it, the schools want to know that you've given some thought into the profession and have actually talked with a pharmacist about your expectations. Those who have pharmacy experience can easily find a pharmacist to write a letter, while those without will have to shadow or meet with a pharmacist to get it done.
Just like 311fighters has said, having nursing experience doesn't necessarily make you ready to go into pharmacy. Hell, if you changed your mind after 1200 hours of nursing, what makes you feel ready to switch over to pharmacy without even speaking with a pharmacist, much less actually working within one?
This is completely true. However, for every person that drops out of the program, the school is losing money and a spot for another person that would have liked to attend. I'm sure if you were on an adcom, you would want to be sure that everyone you admit had thought long and hard about this career path. I believe many schools figure the pharmacist LOR is one way to do so.Like I said, not EVERYONE that goes to pharmacy school has pharmacy experience.
what happens if you mail in more than the required number of LOR, do they actually read all of them or just the first 2 (if 2 are required)? and if there are more sent then they will disregard them since they already read the first 2.
specifically, I'm interested in how USC, UCSF, UCSD, UOP, Western, and Touro treat it.
what happens if you mail in more than the required number of LOR, do they actually read all of them or just the first 2 (if 2 are required)? and if there are more sent then they will disregard them since they already read the first 2.
specifically, I'm interested in how USC, UCSF, UCSD, UOP, Western, and Touro treat it.
Each school has specific requirements for the which LORs they will accept. Check the school's listing on the pharmacas website - If it does not specifiy "from a science professor" - I say go for it. A generic LOR will do nothing for you - an outstanding LOR from an English prof is way better.
~above~
I'm applying to South Carolina, and the pre-pharm advisor there said that any person who has overseen your work and knows you personally is a far better candidate than someone who may have an impressive title. Based on that, I would go with the english instructor.