Quantcast
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

sav_b1

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
21
Reaction score
1

Members don't see this ad.
Hi All!


I have a somewhat specific question about a letter of rec coming from a professor who taught me a non-science course that was listed in a science department. This professor knows me very well, so I definitely want to use this letter.


The course is listed as in the department of molecular and cellular biology. However, the CONTENT of the course was far outside of BPCM, it was very much social study. The title of the course was the Public Engagement with Science.


I am hoping to use this as my non-science LOR, do you think this might create problems for me?


Thanks so much!
 

ellia

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
142
Reaction score
61
Yes, I think this would be fine.
 
L

LoveBeingHuman:)

Make sure to NOT include it as BCMP when filling out the transcript section
 

21Rush12

19h 58m 21.67595s; +35° 12′ 05.7783″
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
4,465
This is definitely a nuance question. My cursory search of the AAMC website doesn’t yield anything specific to science/nonscience designation. School to school this may vary.

This is NYMC’s relevant letter requirement instructions:

“Two (2) letters must be from science faculty who either taught you in a class or supervised independent research for which you received credit toward your science GPA. Acceptable science courses for purposes of letters of evaluation include: biology, chemistry, physics, bio-medical engineering, or bio-engineering, etc. (Math is not considered a science course for purposes of letters of evaluation.)”

This makes me think that you’re in a gray area, but it probably wouldn’t be considered a science letter.

Other schools may have different definitions, but I can’t find anything to contradict.

My vote would therefore be that you can count this as non-science. Check individual school requirements to make sure when designating them just to be sure.
 

gonnif

Rule One: Take a Breath
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
24,256
Reaction score
41,602
1) Classification of a course as BCPM or not in AMCAS has NOTHING to do with letter requirements
2) Letter requirements are set by each individual medical school
3) A school can ask for a non-science faculty letter or a letter from an instructor who taught you in a non science course. Therefore
-- Member of a science faculty, regardless of whether they taught you in a science or non science course, is a science course
-- Instructor in a non-science course, regardless of a science faculty or not, is a non science letter
4) your current letter will not be a non-science letter at some medical schools
5) Adcoms would generally expect a letter from a non-science faculty teaching a non-science course
6) Get a different letter
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

sav_b1

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
@LoveBeingHuman:) , @21Rush12 , thank you so much for the advice. I will look into the policies for the individual schools!

@gonnif thank you so much for the heads up! I will see if I can make something else work.
 
Top