- Joined
- Nov 6, 2011
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey folks,
There is insider information that the Internal Medicine program at Maimonides Medical Center is under threat of probation. It is under the ACGME's radar. An ACGME meeting in January 2012 will conclude the fate of the numerous citations the institution has received.
While the hospital is one of the best equipped in New York City in terms of community hospitals, it is the bad attitude of the management towards residents that has produced a terrible ACGME survey leading to the citations.
The hospital is actually one among a few in NYC which are in profit. However, the residents are paid among the least in NYC. Residents are overworked, with a lot of service responsibilities interfering with academics. The entire focus is on discharging patients, whether or not clinically indicated, as turnover is what pays the hospital. That is possibly one of the factors leading to the hospital being in profit, though. So, instead of spending on residents, the hospital spends on professional case managers who in turn pressurise residents to discharge patients everyday. The hospital is reluctant to hire PAs to do the scut work as their viewpoint is "...it takes 3 PAs to do the same work as a resident... that would cost us millions of dollars..." The hospital calls itself "not-for-profit" nevertheless.
Whatever teaching occurs is grossly sub-par. Private attendings have very poor knowlege/attitude/practice quotients. There are small groups which inter-consult each other for the most trivial things (guess why). The academic environment, if any, is killed by pressure of service responsibilities, including calling several attendings for consults requested by the private attendings.
The culmination of all the above is what led to a disastrous ABIM exam outcome for the batch that just completed in June, with 7 out of 23 residents FAILING the ABIM exam. THAT INCLUDES 2 OF 3 CHIEF RESIDENTS!
On a side note:
The program director himself is hardly interested in residents' welfare. For him, the most important thing on rounds at the beginning of a day is to identify which new patient belongs to which private attending (even though the interaction between the patient and that attending happened several decades ago). He ends up getting the simplest of patients (alcohol-drunk, cellulitis etc) and all the complex service cases end up being transferred to younger attendings trying to make a mark.
Being a jewish program in the heart of a stiflingly orthodox jewish community, a lot of fussy importance is given to celebrating jewish holidays and weekend breaks (Shabbos), creating rather unfair schedules to non-jewish residents.
BOTTOMLINE:
So if you are interviewing there, carefully consider your options. It is actually not a bad idea to go for this program after all, as things are going to change. Nevertheless you need to be brave and bite the bullet.
Most of the current residents are apprehensive about the outcome of the ACGME meeting in January. It can affect all of the fellowships too. But the program has great infrastructure inspite of a pathetic management. Being cited by the ACGME for several factors, that is hopefully going to change. Hopefully for the good for the residents.
There is insider information that the Internal Medicine program at Maimonides Medical Center is under threat of probation. It is under the ACGME's radar. An ACGME meeting in January 2012 will conclude the fate of the numerous citations the institution has received.
While the hospital is one of the best equipped in New York City in terms of community hospitals, it is the bad attitude of the management towards residents that has produced a terrible ACGME survey leading to the citations.
The hospital is actually one among a few in NYC which are in profit. However, the residents are paid among the least in NYC. Residents are overworked, with a lot of service responsibilities interfering with academics. The entire focus is on discharging patients, whether or not clinically indicated, as turnover is what pays the hospital. That is possibly one of the factors leading to the hospital being in profit, though. So, instead of spending on residents, the hospital spends on professional case managers who in turn pressurise residents to discharge patients everyday. The hospital is reluctant to hire PAs to do the scut work as their viewpoint is "...it takes 3 PAs to do the same work as a resident... that would cost us millions of dollars..." The hospital calls itself "not-for-profit" nevertheless.
Whatever teaching occurs is grossly sub-par. Private attendings have very poor knowlege/attitude/practice quotients. There are small groups which inter-consult each other for the most trivial things (guess why). The academic environment, if any, is killed by pressure of service responsibilities, including calling several attendings for consults requested by the private attendings.
The culmination of all the above is what led to a disastrous ABIM exam outcome for the batch that just completed in June, with 7 out of 23 residents FAILING the ABIM exam. THAT INCLUDES 2 OF 3 CHIEF RESIDENTS!
On a side note:
The program director himself is hardly interested in residents' welfare. For him, the most important thing on rounds at the beginning of a day is to identify which new patient belongs to which private attending (even though the interaction between the patient and that attending happened several decades ago). He ends up getting the simplest of patients (alcohol-drunk, cellulitis etc) and all the complex service cases end up being transferred to younger attendings trying to make a mark.
Being a jewish program in the heart of a stiflingly orthodox jewish community, a lot of fussy importance is given to celebrating jewish holidays and weekend breaks (Shabbos), creating rather unfair schedules to non-jewish residents.
BOTTOMLINE:
So if you are interviewing there, carefully consider your options. It is actually not a bad idea to go for this program after all, as things are going to change. Nevertheless you need to be brave and bite the bullet.
Most of the current residents are apprehensive about the outcome of the ACGME meeting in January. It can affect all of the fellowships too. But the program has great infrastructure inspite of a pathetic management. Being cited by the ACGME for several factors, that is hopefully going to change. Hopefully for the good for the residents.
Last edited: