- Joined
- Feb 25, 2003
- Messages
- 123
- Reaction score
- 0
In choosing between surgery and anaesthesiology as potential career choices, it occurred to me that the two fields core competencies are very much unlike each other.
Generally speaking, if you were motivated by localised macroscopic pathologic processes and its treatment, then wouldn't radiology be the natural complementary career choice for someone who didn't crave direct patient contact and ward management?
Anaesthesiology would appear to suit those with more of an analytical mindset interested in thinking about systemic physiology and pharmacology rather.
Then why is it that you always hear about people who did not want to put up with the surgical lifestyle and opted for Anaesthetics.
Generally speaking, if you were motivated by localised macroscopic pathologic processes and its treatment, then wouldn't radiology be the natural complementary career choice for someone who didn't crave direct patient contact and ward management?
Anaesthesiology would appear to suit those with more of an analytical mindset interested in thinking about systemic physiology and pharmacology rather.
Then why is it that you always hear about people who did not want to put up with the surgical lifestyle and opted for Anaesthetics.