MD vs DO war

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Name one.

You're right dood ... all MD schools have excellent rotational sites, no research required. They are all perfect, and it is impossible for DO schools to even come close. Why don't you name all the DO schools you feel lack, since it would just be impossible for me to find an MD school without perfect rotation sites. Man, I cannot WAIT to get into my state allopathic school and then act superior on internet forums!!
 
Oh...and if I fail to obtain a spot in an MD class. I will as a measure of honor for my arrogance give the DO's here the first opportunity to scorn me in a thread announcing my stupidity in the pre-osteo forum.
 
You're right dood ... all MD schools have excellent rotational sites, no research required. They are all perfect, and it is impossible for DO schools to even come close. Why don't you name all the DO schools you feel lack, since it would just be impossible for me to find an MD school without perfect rotation sites. Man, I cannot WAIT to get into my state allopathic school and then act superior on internet forums!!
It doesn't seem to me as though he's acting superior, but just rather asking for some support to some of the arguments you guys are making. Why is it such anathema on here to acknowledge that there are some unfortunate major issues with getting a DO degree instead of an MD degree? That there are issues doesn't make the DO degree worth less, but it can only be helpful to those considering what route to take that the issues are not sugar-coated.
 
It doesn't seem to me as though he's acting superior, but just rather asking for some support to some of the arguments you guys are making. Why is it such anathema on here to acknowledge that there are some unfortunate major issues with getting a DO degree instead of an MD degree? That there are issues doesn't make the DO degree worth less, but it can only be helpful to those considering what route to take that the issues are not sugar-coated.

Okay then ... where is the support that all DOs have inferior rotation sites? How come when the Allo students make sweeping claims against DOs it's fine, but when a comment is made back, they weren't being offensive, and I need proof to point out how absurd they are being. What makes a rotation site poor? What DO programs are being looked down upon? Has anyone actually rotated at these sites to confirm that every single MD school in the US has better sites??? It's pathetic. Either be fair or act biased, don't piss on my back and tell me it's raining please. If you are going to agree, just agree ... but do not tell me he isn't acting superior.
 
Oh...and if I fail to obtain a spot in an MD class. I will as a measure of honor for my arrogance give the DO's here the first opportunity to scorn me in a thread announcing my stupidity in the pre-osteo forum.

You're already on the official list to receive a wedgie from DO attendings in the event that you succeed. There will be no need for you to add to the cacophony of crap produced by the elitist and arrogant fools here in this thread.

I don't always drink beer but when I do, I drink "no one gives a **** except pre-meds on SDN".

Elitism is insecurity. Carry on underlings.
 
It doesn't seem to me as though he's acting superior, but just rather asking for some support to some of the arguments you guys are making. Why is it such anathema on here to acknowledge that there are some unfortunate major issues with getting a DO degree instead of an MD degree? That there are issues doesn't make the DO degree worth less, but it can only be helpful to those considering what route to take that the issues are not sugar-coated.

And these issues are?? Why such anathema on here to acknowledge that both paths lead to fully licensed physicians that practice in every aspect of medicine. Can you explain to me the doors that magically open to you as an MD? I'm just a little confused with the people who really know nothing about the DO degree, but automatically assume there are major issues and call defense sugar coating facts? Is claiming that there is not ONE MD school with less than stellar rotation sites not 'sugar coating facts ???'
 
And anyone who is familiar with radiology residencies knows that SHMC is not a top, or even middle, radiology program.

Who cares?

No, that's just the point. I knew not to. Take a few minutes, go through some radiology program websites and look at the top, oh, let's say every medical school ranked by US News. .

You still pay attention to US News rankings? Are you sure you're not pre-med? Do you still brag to people about your MCAT scores? :laugh:

As far as I'm concerned, if you didn't rotate through or interview at a residency then your opinion is based completely on hearsay and worthless compared to that of someone who has actual experience.
 
You're already on the official list to receive a wedgie from DO attendings in the event that you succeed. There will be no need for you to add to the cacophony of crap produced by the elitist and arrogant fools here in this thread.

I don't always drink beer but when I do, I drink "no one gives a **** except pre-meds on SDN".

Elitism is insecurity. Carry on underlings.

___________________
 
I hear you. I'm using a rough sandlot calculus. I don't want any static, but i appreciate the opportunity to explore my thoughts on the issue. NYCOM is one of the most expensive medical schools in the union. My position is simply that they should therefore provide a superior or at least favorably marketable result for their students. I remain unconvinced that this is the case. But I agree elitism is damaging to the enterprise of human potential in general. I will be more cautious in the future. Besides....My mind is made up and you can expect no more provocations from me.

In my eyes NYCOM gave me a terrific education (and still is). I jumped on opportunities that were presented to me, studied hard, and have no regrets about choosing it. I'm not here to plug NYCOM, but every school will have people who whine and people who excel. I honestly don't think you were trying to stir up trouble but pre-meds are a very impressionable bunch. All it takes is one piece of misinformation to enter their head and they'll spout it off as fact to whomever will listen.
 
"I've spoken with many doctors in various fields plus my uncle is a radiologist in a large pretigious practice and they all told me the same thing...<fill in the blank>"

My friend, your signature is gold.

You are amidst sniveling jackals. Grab one by the throat and the remainder will scurry; this is how the Most Interesting Man in the World - and D.O., handles such triteness.
 
In my eyes NYCOM gave me a terrific education (and still is). I jumped on opportunities that were presented to me, studied hard, and have no regrets about choosing it. I'm not here to plug NYCOM, but every school will have people who whine and people who excel. I honestly don't think you were trying to stir up trouble but pre-meds are a very impressionable bunch. All it takes is one piece of misinformation to enter their head and they'll spout it off as fact to whomever will listen.

Well congrats. You'll be an attending with many opportunities to dish out wedgies, while I will still be humping it to get into medical school.
 
Except for you of course..

It's obvious you did not comprehend the paradox in the last line of my post; I'm often misunderstood.

You can blow me.

What an ugly thing to say. Does this mean we're not friends anymore? You know, Nasrudin, if I thought you were not my friend - I just don't think I could bear it.
 
Name one.

NYCOM rotates through the same hospitals as NYU, Einstein, SUNY Downstate, and SUNY stonybrook students. You people are really grasping at straws.
 
It's obvious you did not comprehend the paradox in the last line of my post; I'm often misunderstood. I also will not hesitate to not-so-surgically-remove your insignificant phallus and wear it as a necklace.


Look this is poor form on both of our parts. I offer you my apologies. It's just you brought up memories of school bullies and so I reacted.

I know I can hit people's nerves so I understand your anger. But let's act in the interests of professionals in a joint effort.

Really...I just needed an understanding of my goals in preparation for the MCAT. I do best when I cannot rationalize anything less than maximum effort, without which, and this derives from knowledge of self not in reference to you I would end up frustrated with myself.

Nasrudin out.
 
"one piece of misinformation to enter their <pre-meds> head and they'll spout it off as fact to whomever will listen" - J1515

Case in point with regard to the aforementioned wedgies:

You'll be an attending with many opportunities to dish out wedgies
 
Look this is poor form on both of our parts.

My form is impeccable; In fact, I decided that your phallus would not appeal to the ladies with whom I associate - simply hanging so insignficantly around my neck. So as you can clearly see, I retracted the statement long ago.

Carry on with your studies, friend, and may the sun shine bright for you.
 
It's obvious you did not comprehend the paradox in the last line of my post; I'm often misunderstood.



What an ugly thing to say. Does this mean we're not friends anymore? You know, Nasrudin, if I thought you were not my friend - I just don't think I could bear it.

"I'm your huckleberry ... that's just my game."

Love Tombstone, lets make this thread about that instead.
 
"I'm your huckleberry ... that's just my game."

Love Tombstone, lets make this thread about that instead.

best scene is when wyatt goes into the saloon and kicks out the cowboy played by billy bob thornton.

" are you gonna do something or just stand their and bleed."

best line ever.

that being said, doc holiday is one of my favorite characters. favorite doc lines

1. "you know? frederick f**king chopin?"

2. Why Ike, whatever do you mean? Maybe poker's just not your game. I know! Let's have a spelling contest
 
Doc Holliday vs Johnny Ringo
-or-
DO vs. MD :laugh:

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-Npn5dqO1w[/YOUTUBE]
 
You're right dood ... all MD schools have excellent rotational sites, no research required. They are all perfect, and it is impossible for DO schools to even come close. Why don't you name all the DO schools you feel lack, since it would just be impossible for me to find an MD school without perfect rotation sites. Man, I cannot WAIT to get into my state allopathic school and then act superior on internet forums!!

You make wild claims and have no evidence. I am just looking for the evidence. Find me an MD school that, like you say has the same problems that many osteopathic schools suffer from. The thing is you will have trouble finding one because those problems are unique to the osteopathic world. 4th years recognize it, current attendings recognize it but it seems the premeds wont believe it and speak from their overwhelming experience

The facts have been laid out by people who have already gone through it. You are just like a kid who doesnt want to hear and so covers his ears and screams lalalala really loud.

Okay then ... where is the support that all DOs have inferior rotation sites? How come when the Allo students make sweeping claims against DOs it's fine, but when a comment is made back, they weren't being offensive, and I need proof to point out how absurd they are being. What makes a rotation site poor? What DO programs are being looked down upon? Has anyone actually rotated at these sites to confirm that every single MD school in the US has better sites??? It's pathetic. Either be fair or act biased, don't piss on my back and tell me it's raining please. If you are going to agree, just agree ... but do not tell me he isn't acting superior.

See the numerous posts by DO students who have already been through their rotations. I never said all DOs. What I did say was that there is a trend. This is made readily apparent by those who have come before you and have posted on SDN. Maybe they were just lying though and a pre-med knows better from his vast experience than fellow DO students who have already been through rotations and the match.
 
You're right dood ... all MD schools have excellent rotational sites, no research required. They are all perfect, and it is impossible for DO schools to even come close. Why don't you name all the DO schools you feel lack, since it would just be impossible for me to find an MD school without perfect rotation sites.
You're being flippant, but I see what Instatewater is getting at.

The medical schools I would have a problem attending are the ones without their own hospitals. I know of more than one in which your third and fourth year you spend either stringing together visiting rotations (in which you spend as much time getting learning a particular hospital as you do learning the content of your rotation) or three months at a time at small community medical centers without the exposure I'd want.

I don't know if this is just a DO problem or an MD problem as well. I do know of several DO schools like this. I don't know of any MD schools like that. There may very well be MD schools like that, I just never came across them.

Instatewater is probably using "Name one" in that regard. I'm curious to see if lack of a home hospital is a problem of just some DO schools or if it's an issue with some MD schools as well. I'd suspect it might be, but don't know of any examples.
 
where is the support that all DOs have inferior rotation sites?
Some DO schools have hospitals with great rotation sites. Some DO schools have no hospital and guest rotate at other institutions. I don't want to throw stones and knock anyone's school, but a quick search will show this.

Again, this is not an anti-DO thing. There may be allopathic schools without home rotations as well. I just don't know of any. I'd be suprised if they all did.
What makes a rotation site poor?
A poor rotation site is one that lacks volume and diversity. A clinic rotation for family medicine is fine, but you want to have access to a large medical center where you can get a lot of variation to broaden your skills and a lot of volume so that you can sharpen them.

Some MD programs have excellent medical centers to call home. Some have pretty ho-hum ones. I'd recommend folks looking for a medical school look closely at the home hospital. This is where you'll spend the majority of your time learning medicine. It's a much more important factor than the first two year curriculum.
 
What DO programs are being looked down upon?
I would not look down on any program, DO or MD. I would look less favorably at any program that does not have its own hospital. Once you find programs with their own hospital, look for the better hospitals. Then narrow down your choices.
Has anyone actually rotated at these sites to confirm that every single MD school in the US has better sites???
No. Anyone who says that every single MD school has better sites than every DO program is foolish. There are some very good osteopathic hospitals out there and a lot of so-so allopathic ones.

I wouldn't make that generalization. It's silly.
 
You make wild claims and have no evidence. I am just looking for the evidence. Find me an MD school that, like you say has the same problems that many osteopathic schools suffer from. The thing is you will have trouble finding one because those problems are unique to the osteopathic world.

And your evidence is .... where?

4th years recognize it, current attendings recognize it but it seems the premeds wont believe it and speak from their overwhelming experience

That's funny ... almost every DO attending who posts on the board says they have no trouble whatsoever, and practice with MDs everyday.

I have also said, numerous times, on this thread that I am a pre-med and everything I say comes with a disclaimer. However, this does NOT mean you can throw out general stereotypes without evidence and I cannot.

The facts have been laid out by people who have already gone through it. You are just like a kid who doesnt want to hear and so covers his ears and screams lalalala really loud.

These 'facts' (which by the way are so far from facts) are usually posts by disgruntled individuals who wanted to go MD, or regret their decision to go into medicine in the first place. These are the people who select schools without researching their clinicals, almost ALWAYS attend brand spanking new schools, and refuse to admit to anything besides ranting. These people do not represent happy osteopathic students who attend established schools. If certain people buy into the 'do your rotations anywhere you want!' stuff from brand new schools, this is their mistake. The reason why you see this is because the schools aren't usually affiliated with a University ... not because they are a DO school.

Now ... is THIS an issue. Yes, YES, YES it is .... I don't think anyone denies that schools should stop expanding without creating new residencies and clinical sites. However, if you did this with an MD school they would suffer the same problems (now you can probably sit here and say 'Oh the AMA would never do that ... blah blah' -that's not an issue related to this thread). However, this really, really doesn't concern students from established schools. There are rankings of DO schools just as there is MD schools. Do you think UCSF has better clinicals than an MD school in a mid-west state??? Most likely (in your opinion of what makes rotations good), just the same way that DMU or MSUCOM probably have 'better' clinicals than new DO schools.

My point is that this is not an MD vs DO issue, it is individual medical schools, and that is not how you are approaching it.



See the numerous posts by DO students who have already been through their rotations. I never said all DOs. What I did say was that there is a trend.

Do you really think people would create SDN accounts to come on the boards and rave about how wonderful their rotations have been? No, people make these irrational posts to complain. This isn't a trend. Do more people do this concerning DO schools than MD schools ??? Yes. However, DO schools are opening constantly and I really doubt that people from established schools have ANY problems with their rotations. This is the exact same way someone who went to an Allo school in the mid-west might complain about not seeing the trama one would in a big hospital on the coasts. Once again, this is specific ... not just DO.


Maybe they were just lying though and a pre-med knows better from his vast experience than fellow DO students who have already been through rotations and the match.

Dood ... I'm a pre-med, I know everything ... duh!! Once again, good outweighs bad, people who are happy don't make irate posts, etc etc.

So what is the bottom line ...

-I don't want to sit here and bicker for days
-I don't see your beef with DOs. Trust me, I really, really do understand and accept that there are issues with some NEWER DO schools and rotations will be a huge part of my (eventual) decision.
-I'm not trying to ignore the issues, just explain that they aren't life ending, but please take everything on SDN with a grain of salt (you never know who these people are).
-There are degrees of medical schools, MD and DO ... not all DO schools are equal, just how all MD schools aren't equal.
-Both paths lead to a singular end ... I don't think a divide is best for anyone.

I'm sure this post is filled with mistakes, sentences that don't make sense etc etc ... this is the longest thing I have ever written on SDN, and do not feel like checking it.
 
NotDeadYet ...

I completely agree with everything you are saying. Our posts actually touch on similar issues, and thank you for approaching this on an individual school basis, and not lumping all DO schools with specific problems of certain schools. I'm actually not sure if there are any MD schools without their own hospitals, but a lot of DO schools do not have their own hospital but have absolutely no problem with rotations (where on the other hand, others do have issues). PCOM, probably the most established DO school, actually does not have their own hospital, but doesn't seem to suffer one bit.

I thank you once again for your logical responses, and assure you that any of mine that seems sarcastic or general were simply to make a point.
 
...
 
Last edited:
I agree. Not all DO school rotations suck......just the one that jaggerplate gets in to.........Given that he actually does?????????????

Oh ****, I'm just messin'. It's hard to be that mean.......unless it is on the caribbean threads. Its ok to treat them as unequals.:meanie::laugh::meanie::laugh:

Now that is one hope we should all rally behind.
 
There are rankings of DO schools just as there is MD schools. Do you think UCSF has better clinicals than an MD school in a mid-west state???

No.

JaggerPlate said:
Most likely (in your opinion of what makes rotations good), just the same way that DMU or MSUCOM probably have 'better' clinicals than new DO schools.

Just curious, have you visited Des Moines or East Lansing before?
 
This is such a great site because there are always the med students/residents to put people in their place. Gives mods a nice break.👍

I think part of my worry with DO schools is that I would only want to go to DO school if I didn't get into any allo school and take the USMLE and get into an Allo residency. Now, how do I lie about that to adcoms who probably DON'T want to hear that?

I just need to do more research, so I shut my mouth about any negative things I might let slip about DO schools because I know I know very little about it. I just do not want to get into a DO school with the rotation site issues.


Question: Does having connections at hospitals work in your favor when you're looking for rotation sites? I'm asking people who have gone through this and know for a fact.
 
This is such a great site because there are always the med students/residents to put people in their place. Gives mods a nice break.👍

Laugh. Yeah, people don't just argue on here to argue. This is all to make sure everyone knows only truth/fact ... no opinions. Just playing with ya, but remember that everyone has a stance on basically everything on the boards, and this will shine through in 'putting people in their place.'

(I'm guilty of all these things by the way)

Frisko ... it depends. If you are just asking because you are curious; no, I have never been. However, if you are going to some how make this into an argument against me then yes ... I have been there and am aware of everything that is going on there.
 
Frisko ... it depends. If you are just asking because you are curious; no, I have never been. However, if you are going to some how make this into an argument against me then yes ... I have been there and am aware of everything that is going on there.

lol no man, no. I really was just asking. MSUCOM is a great school and I've visited DMU when I was in Iowa in October; it seemed like a good school as well. I only quoted the one thing about UCSF having better clinicals than some podunk midwest school cause I'm thinking about attending Wayne State (Detroit=midwest) and I've heard they have some great clinical education.
 
lol no man, no. I really was just asking. MSUCOM is a great school and I've visited DMU when I was in Iowa in October; it seemed like a good school as well. I only quoted the one thing about UCSF having better clinicals than some podunk midwest school cause I'm thinking about attending Wayne State (Detroit=midwest) and I've heard they have some great clinical education.

Hahah no harm intended man. Your MDApps is crazy, and personally I think that you will do the best at a school where you are comfortable. If you don't feel right at JHU, you wouldn't necessarily be better off going there just for the name (even though that's a nice one to throw around at cocktail parties). Congrats on all your success, and I'll have to get around to checking out DMU someday.
 
Jaggerplate, no need to be so defensive. Facts are facts, Average MCAT of DO schools is significantly lower than MD schools, why can't you accept that? Another issue is setting up clinical rotations at some schools. Let's take KCUMB for example, a well-established, pretty highly regarded DO school. They have a lottery system to assign you a spot at one of their affiliated hospitals. These hospitals are scattered pretty much all over the midwest so you will see yourself moving every 6 weeks or so. Other schools are worse as they try to lure you by telling you that you can do rotations anywhere. What they fail to explain is the fact that you will have to set them up yourself and will be pretty much living out of your car. Having said that, the established schools operate just like MD schools and have a good system in place.

There's an issue with DO residencies that you speak of as well. Seems like every year there's a new school, yet the number of residencies stay at where they have been for some time. In fact, if allopaths decide to exclude us from allo match, more than 2/3 of DO graduates won't even match due to limited number of DO residency spots.

One more thing, as a future osteopathic physician, I don't like to argue DO's competitiveness in allo match, I am simply grateful that it is even an option for us as our own don't allow allopaths to compete in DO match.
 
Jaggerplate, no need to be so defensive. Facts are facts, Average MCAT of DO schools is significantly lower than MD schools, why can't you accept that? Another issue is setting up clinical rotations at some schools. Let's take KCUMB for example, a well-established, pretty highly regarded DO school. They have a lottery system to assign you a spot at one of their affiliated hospitals. These hospitals are scattered pretty much all over the midwest so you will see yourself moving every 6 weeks or so. Other schools are worse as they try to lure you by telling you that you can do rotations anywhere. What they fail to explain is the fact that you will have to set them up yourself and will be pretty much living out of your car. Having said that, the established schools operate just like MD schools and have a good system in place.

There's an issue with DO residencies that you speak of as well. Seems like every year there's a new school, yet the number of residencies stay at where they have been for some time. In fact, if allopaths decide to exclude us from allo match, more than 2/3 of DO graduates won't even match due to limited number of DO residency spots.

One more thing, as a future osteopathic physician, I don't like to argue DO's competitiveness in allo match, I am simply grateful that it is even an option for us as our own don't allow allopaths to compete in DO match.

Sam ... did you read anything that I wrote??? Literally, that post had absolutely nothing to do with anything, and the points that you were saying I wasn't accepting were points that I specifically said I know exist. I never brought up the allo match, blatantly said the MCAT argument is something I personally find to not be an issue at all (I'm sure this will blow up so I'll cover it later), and saying that 2/3 of DOs won't match is definitely the statement of the day ... congratulations.
 
Sam ... did you read anything that I wrote??? Literally, that post had absolutely nothing to do with anything, and the points that you were saying I wasn't accepting were points that I specifically said I know exist. I never brought up the allo match, blatantly said the MCAT argument is something I personally find to not be an issue at all (I'm sure this will blow up so I'll cover it later), and saying that 2/3 of DOs won't match is definitely the statement of the day ... congratulations.

I might have been off with the numbers, checkout the number of residency spots at AOA website, I am positive that it's around the neighborhood. What do you have to say about the system used by some schools to assign rotation spots? I would say KCUMB is a pretty well known and well established school.
 
I don't know about the degrees but I do know that people with insufficient typing skills have to go to Pre-Osteopathic after they can't keep up in the Pre-Allopathic forum.

But the osteopaths all use ergonomic keyboards . . .
 
Let's take KCUMB for example, a well-established, pretty highly regarded DO school. They have a lottery system to assign you a spot at one of their affiliated hospitals. These hospitals are scattered pretty much all over the midwest so you will see yourself moving every 6 weeks or so.

Uh, this is a misconception. You do not move around for your third year rotations, unless you stay in KC for your rotations. You pick three choices and you are assigned one of the three by lottery. I think the majority of students get their first choice of rotation site. Contrary to what you said, you stay at that site the whole time and do all of your required third year rotations there. It works a bit differently if you stay in KC for your rotations... Anyway, I just wanted to clarify that.
 
The debate between MDs and DOs really only exists in the world of the Pre-med. Past that its all about your ability to do the job that you said you would. If this were an argument about the difference between MDs and Doctors of Chiropractic than things would be different, but its not. If you want proof that the MD/DO argument exists only in the Pre-med universe than think about this: DOs take both the COMLEX and USMLE board exams and can apply for Allopathic residency programs. Seems to me that if the powers that be recognize the DO in such a fashion then they must be the same.
 
*yawn*

The difference between an MD versus a DO degree? Easy... the length of the OP's penis (ie tiny).
 
Let's take KCUMB for example, a well-established, pretty highly regarded DO school. They have a lottery system to assign you a spot at one of their affiliated hospitals. These hospitals are scattered pretty much all over the midwest so you will see yourself moving every 6 weeks or so. Other schools are worse as they try to lure you by telling you that you can do rotations anywhere. What they fail to explain is the fact that you will have to set them up yourself and will be pretty much living out of your car.

:laugh:
 
In fact, if allopaths decide to exclude us from allo match, more than 2/3 of DO graduates won't even match due to limited number of DO residency spots.

I suggest you recheck your math.
 
This is one of those fallacies that gets kicked around on SDN all the time. Don't kid yourself, there remains bias towards DOs in the MD communities, worse in the surgical fields.

I work in the EMS field, and I am required to get an 'MD signature' whenever I perform an invasive procedure. I actually encountered a situation where I was questioned about getting a DO's signature at the ER, even though it is only a physician's signature that is required.
 
Interesting read relevant to this discussion. *4 yrs old.

http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/104/9/367

Though I do agree with your signature, I must say this article demonstrates my point. People tend to do this:

-I had a bad experience with a specific DO rotation, internship, or residency, and had a better experience with my allopathic counterpart.
--> Everything DO is screwed up, this means all DO schools, rotations, internships and residencies are sub par to MD. Ergo, MD > DO

-I had a bad experience with a specific MD rotation, intership, or residency.
--> That one program must be bad, I will stay away from it specifically ... carry on.

Instead of evaluating DO stuff on a specific basis (like MD jazz), stuff like bad SDN posts or one person's experience tend to make everyone think that anything DO has to be inadequate.

(Note: I have not gone through any DO or MD rotations, internships, or residencies ... my comments simply evaluate the unfair nature of the situation. People can continue to comment on the frequency of bad DO experiences or whatever else as much as they please).
 
This is one of those fallacies that gets kicked around on SDN all the time. Don't kid yourself, there remains bias towards DOs in the MD communities, worse in the surgical fields.

The bias is also heavy in some of the states that do not have a DO school. I see it all the time in the hospitals in my area. Sad but true.🙁
 
I work in the EMS field, and I am required to get an 'MD signature' whenever I perform an invasive procedure. I actually encountered a situation where I was questioned about getting a DO's signature at the ER, even though it is only a physician's signature that is required.

Whoever questioned you had no idea what they were talking about.
 
Obviously. My point is that that is part of the problem.

Ehh it seems to me that, since TraMD is a doctor, and finds it absurd, a weird thing, ie doesn't happen a lot, and that you were an EMS who had it happen once ... what he says might be more accurate. Doesn't seem like this happens a lot. I'm not trying to be offensive ... I just think you are reaching to make a point here.
 
Ehh it seems to me that, since TraMD is a doctor, and finds it absurd, a weird thing, ie doesn't happen a lot, and that you were an EMS who had it happen once ... what he says might be more accurate. Doesn't seem like this happens a lot. I'm not trying to be offensive ... I just think you are reaching to make a point here.

How do you draw from his post that he finds it absurd or that it doesn't happen a lot? He said that person didn't know what he was talking about. That's it.
 
That's funny ... almost every DO attending who posts on the board says they have no trouble whatsoever, and practice with MDs everyday.

That is not what the argument is about. The argument is about clinicals and access to residency. A DO who goes through X residency is going to have the same competnecy to an MD residency who goes through the same residency. Not going to fight you on that.

However, if you did this with an MD school they would suffer the same problems (now you can probably sit here and say 'Oh the AMA would never do that ... blah blah' -that's not an issue related to this thread). However, this really, really doesn't concern students from established schools. There are rankings of DO schools just as there is MD schools. Do you think UCSF has better clinicals than an MD school in a mid-west state??? Most likely (in your opinion of what makes rotations good), just the same way that DMU or MSUCOM probably have 'better' clinicals than new DO schools.

First the AMA has nothing to do with the money allocated from congress. That is set at the '97 levels I believe so were the MD schools to expand the number of allo residencies wouldnt change. That said there are something like 22K residenceis and 15K MD graduates so it wouldnt be much of an issue.

Clinicals are 'good' if they are
1) at an established hospitals that
2) draws enough cases from a diverse population and
3) Are established clincal which means they have a higher likelihood of having the kinks worked out
4) they are from a central hosptial that is either on the campus or for the medical school
5) The medical students actually gets to do some stuff- deliver babies, put in CVC, folleys etc

I know nothing about UCSF clinicals or midwest schools so I cant comment.

Do you really think people would create SDN accounts to come on the boards and rave about how wonderful their rotations have been? No, people make these irrational posts to complain. This isn't a trend. Do more people do this concerning DO schools than MD schools ??? Yes. However, DO schools are opening constantly and I really doubt that people from established schools have ANY problems with their rotations. This is the exact same way someone who went to an Allo school in the mid-west might complain about not seeing the trama one would in a big hospital on the coasts. Once again, this is specific ... not just DO.

Clearly those people created their accounts to b!tch about rotations and matching rather than already having the account and when they realized the reality they posted on the topic.

-I don't see your beef with DOs. Trust me, I really, really do understand and accept that there are issues with some NEWER DO schools and rotations will be a huge part of my (eventual) decision.
-I'm not trying to ignore the issues, just explain that they aren't life ending, but please take everything on SDN with a grain of salt
-There are degrees of medical schools, MD and DO ... not all DO schools are equal, just how all MD schools aren't equal.
-Both paths lead to a singular end ... I don't think a divide is best for anyone.

I'm sure this post is filled with mistakes, sentences that don't make sense etc etc ... this is the longest thing I have ever written on SDN, and do not feel like checking it.

I have no beef with DOs but if everyone sits here like all is good, no one is served. It is good for applicants to be aware of possible problems and look into them.

I agree that a divide is not best for anyone. Personally I think that the two paths should integrate into one and fall under LCME accredidation standards. There really doesnt seem to be any reason other than traditon and foolish pride to keep the 2 separate. Furthermore since COCA doesnt seem to have anyone's interest in mind besides their own, this would improve the problems at some of the newer osteo medical schools.
 
Top