Medicare for anesthesiologists 65 or older

Started by Drwine
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Which insurance do you have at age 65 and over?

  • Group insurance through employer

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • Traditional Medicare plus Medigap

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • Medicare Advantage

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
The MAGAs have never offered a plan for those who will be uninsured via cuts or qualification changes. It will be several million citizens (many of them children). What do you plan for them? It seems the implied plan is just to financially ruin them and let/make them die in misery?
That’s the common rhetoric of ACA supporters

Find me another solution

They don’t have to offer another solution because the ACA passed without any republican support.

The Dems own the law. Yet keep harassing and blaming the republicans for not fixing their own law.
 
  • Love
Reactions: jwk
That’s the common rhetoric of ACA supporters

Find me another solution

They don’t have to offer another solution because the ACA passed without any republican support.

The Dems own the law. Yet keep harassing and blaming the republicans for not fixing their own law.
So what’s the alternative?

FWIW I’d go for Medicare for all.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Correct. I’m all for Medicare for all. Except no one knows how to pay for it.

Everyone wants it. No one wants to pay for it.
1-2% graduated annual wealth tax on any US citizen or permanent resident with assets over 100 million USD plus big graduated inheritance tax. Done!
 
1-2% graduated annual wealth tax on any US citizen or permanent resident with assets over 100 million USD plus big graduated inheritance tax. Done!
U know that won’t happen. Our chance to reset wealth was in 2008.

What the rich get is for the poor people to panic that their measly 200-400k IRA is down 50% during the financial crash. When the rich are worried their 100 million portfolio is down to 50 million and potentially going down to zero.

It’s far easier for us docs to go down to zero and rebuild than the super rich to go to zero and rebuild Becuase they aren’t use to working for it.

That’s why the rich got bailed out in 2008. Not to save the poor people. But to save the rich
 
U know that won’t happen. Our chance to reset wealth was in 2008.

What the rich get is for the poor people to panic that their measly 200-400k IRA is down 50% during the financial crash. When the rich are worried their 100 million portfolio is down to 50 million and potentially going down to zero.

It’s far easier for us docs to go down to zero and rebuild than the super rich to go to zero and rebuild Becuase they aren’t use to working for it.

That’s why the rich got bailed out in 2008. Not to save the poor people. But to save the rich
Agreed it’s unlikely, but it’d be the logical way to do it for the reasons you mentioned.

Depending on the swing-back, president AOC might do it.
 
Agreed it’s unlikely, but it’d be the logical way to do it for the reasons you mentioned.

Depending on the swing-back, president AOC might do it.
President AOC - 🤣🤣🤣 Even the Dems aren't that stupid nationwide, even though they are in NYC.