Maybe it is..maybe it isnt. Not a small sample size though. **** happens. Democratic presidents have frequently had to dig the economy out of holes dug under RepublicansSome of the data is just pure luck. Had Clinton stayed on 8 months later. He’s been screwed
Had bush 43 left 5 months earlier. He’s be considered a great president in terms of the economy. The economy was roaring 2003-2007 with bush 43
The economy tanked 2000-2001 with Clinton leaving bush coming on with markets peaking jan1 and tanking throughout the next 20 months
Just a matter of sheer months can affect data.
But it falls in line with economic expectations. Massive tax cuts for rich never generate as much economic benefit as advertised. So republican policies arent expected to generate enough to balance out their deficits.
The Harris economic plan was also expected to generate smaller budget deficits than Trumps plan