• It's our birthday!

    Thank you to all our members and donors for supporting us for since 1999.

MOCA 2.0 Deadline - Participate or NOT???

What do you think of MOCA 2.0?

  • It's a valid program and should be required of ALL anesthesiologists.

  • It's a money grab by the ABA.


Results are only viewable after voting.

Dr Acula

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Dec 11, 2007
11
2
  1. Attending Physician
    MOCA 1.0, 2.0, whatever you want to call it is clearly a money grab by the ABA. If it were truly about safety or proficiency or whatever, then it would be required for EVERYONE.

    So with the deadline of March 31st approaching, are there any alternatives to paying the extortionists until an offense can be mounted to strike down MOCA in all forms?

    I strongly support CME, and CME requirements but not money grabs like MOCA 2.0. Are there any groups still fighting it like the IM docs who struck down their version of MOCA.

    A
     
    • Like
    Reactions: 1 users

    Hawaiian Bruin

    Breaking Good
    15+ Year Member
    Mar 13, 2003
    2,180
    1,198
    1. Attending Physician
      MOCA 1.0, 2.0, whatever you want to call it is clearly a money grab by the ABA. If it were truly about safety or proficiency or whatever, then it would be required for EVERYONE.

      So with the deadline of March 31st approaching, are there any alternatives to paying the extortionists until an offense can be mounted to strike down MOCA in all forms?

      I strongly support CME, and CME requirements but not money grabs like MOCA 2.0. Are there any groups still fighting it like the IM docs who struck down their version of MOCA.

      A
      I did it this year. I will not be doing it next year or ever again. The MOCA minute questions are a joke. The part 4 homework is a joke. No patient has ever asked me if I do MOCA; the assertion that the public demands it is a complete falsehood.

      MOCA is a practice tax levied by the ABA.

      Sign up for NBPAS. Lobby your hospital to accept it. A list of hospitals that currently recognize it is here: https://nbpas.org/hospitals-accepting-nbpas-diplomats/ If it's good enough for Texas Heart, should be good enough for everyone.

      Just say no.
       
      • Like
      Reactions: 2 users

      pgg

      Laugh at me, will they?
      Administrator
      Volunteer Staff
      Navy
      Verified Expert
      15+ Year Member
      Dec 15, 2005
      13,760
      14,583
      Home again
      1. Attending Physician
        I'm too young to burn my board cert bridge with the ABA just yet. I'll finish playing the game and paying my money this cycle but next round ...

        I'm a bit disappointed with the MOCA Minute implementation thus far. It's a good idea. The quality of the questions was quite variable, from trivial to obscure, with a few good ones mixed in. It's a hard problem to come up with good questions on good topics given the 60 second limit. The software implementation was just poor though ... no reason for me to get repeat questions that I got right the first time. No excusing that. But next week I'll do another 30 and hope for something better.
         
        About the Ads

        sevoflurane

        Ride
        15+ Year Member
        Jul 16, 2003
        5,736
        3,126
        1. Attending Physician
          Yeah... Agree with pgg. Not ready to burn any bridges and the ABA knows this. MOCA minute is a joke. I've only completed about 10 questions, but about 5/10 of them were non-clinical to somewhat clinical esoteric questions.
          I am not an infectious disease physician. So viruses from Uganda aren't my forte.
          Not happy with the implementation of this 2.0 system thus far.
           

          BLADEMDA

          Full Member
          10+ Year Member
          Apr 22, 2007
          20,472
          6,712
          Southeast
          1. Attending Physician
            I'm too young to burn my board cert bridge with the ABA just yet. I'll finish playing the game and paying my money this cycle but next round ...

            I'm a bit disappointed with the MOCA Minute implementation thus far. It's a good idea. The quality of the questions was quite variable, from trivial to obscure, with a few good ones mixed in. It's a hard problem to come up with good questions on good topics given the 60 second limit. The software implementation was just poor though ... no reason for me to get repeat questions that I got right the first time. No excusing that. But next week I'll do another 30 and hope for something better.

            I'm glad that Moca 2.0 won't be an issue for me going forward as it is a waste of time. I'll recertify (voluntarily) one more time then stop with MOCA altogether. It simply doesn't add any real world value.

            As for those stuck with this system I recommend the ABA adapt the ACE Questions each year or the MOCA minute to complete the knowledge portion of MOCA. The ABA can "license" the ACE questions and then ask them on an online exam each year with the same questions. This will asses "learning" and "core competence" without being overly harsh.
             

            pgg

            Laugh at me, will they?
            Administrator
            Volunteer Staff
            Navy
            Verified Expert
            15+ Year Member
            Dec 15, 2005
            13,760
            14,583
            Home again
            1. Attending Physician
              The worst part of MOCA Minute is that it doesn't look like they've finished deciding what to do with it yet.

              There's a standard, supposedly, but they say they need more data to set it.

              So what happens to the people who don't meet the standard? Do they have to do extra MOCA Minutes? Will they not get recertified? Do they get scolded? Do they have to pay another $210 penance?

              If there's some tangible consequence to "failure" measurable in either time or money, it'll be gamed by people, which will skew the results.
               

              Impromptu

              Full Member
              10+ Year Member
              Feb 19, 2009
              600
              204
              1. Attending Physician
                Grandfathering people into a program doesn't necessarily make it a money grab. That is done in many things for practical reasons, not the least of which are the honest intentions of those who entered into the agreement in the first place. If you were told you had a lifetime membership, and then 9 years later it was taken away, you would be quite upset.

                Of course, allowing grandfathering, makes the thing much more easy to introduce, because the old curmudgeons won't fight back. They have too many other things they need to fight back against.
                 

                skypilot

                2K Member
                15+ Year Member
                Dec 15, 2002
                2,377
                135
                Beantown
                1. Attending Physician
                  the 3/31 deadline isn't a hard deadline. If you register afterwards, you just have to do more questions to makeup for it for the rest of the year, this is from the ABA when I emailed them.


                  That is good. I was wondering what they would do to procrastinators like me. I guess I can start the MOCA minute and still contribute to NBPAS without being a hypocrite, just a chicken?
                   
                  • Like
                  Reactions: 1 user
                  About the Ads
                  This thread is more than 5 years old.

                  Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

                  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
                  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
                  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
                  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
                  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
                  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
                  7. This thread is locked.