Who let the gynecologist come in here and lock a good thread about pathology. Obviously the gynecologist has no clue that theranos is a laboratory!
Moderator Abuse!!
- Thread starter Thrombus
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2018
- Messages
- 112
- Reaction score
- 47
Seems to be an overreaction by the moderator. Sheesh.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Messages
- 2,175
- Reaction score
- 1,068
No doubt. He or she must be clueless...or have ties to the company
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2003
- Messages
- 28,059
- Reaction score
- 441
Because the thread turned into a political discussion, not a theranos discussion. THere are other places to discuss politics. Move on.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2000
- Messages
- 39,952
- Reaction score
- 18,721
Exactly. It had nothing to do with the company and everything to do with the politics and the tone of the discussion as you rightly stated.
The decision was made by the team and action taken by the moderator who was available at the time.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Messages
- 2,175
- Reaction score
- 1,068
There was barely any political commentary in the thread, except LADoc and some other dude. People just look for stuff to offend them anymore.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2000
- Messages
- 39,952
- Reaction score
- 18,721
As noted above, this is about political commentary not about people being offended. Please re-read the statement from your moderator.
It doesn’t matter whether it’s one person or 50 people, there are other more appropriate forum for such discussions.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2008
- Messages
- 404
- Reaction score
- 26
Not abuse, but definitely over reaction.
Abuse of their privileges.
Very pertinent thread that some out of control nanny type personality shut down.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2004
- Messages
- 7,132
- Reaction score
- 1,255
Funny as I always think SDN has a tendency to veer into "Reddit Neckbeard Land" of no to little moderation. So much so in fact that when actual moderation occurs, it looks jarring to posters.
To be honest, about 25% of my posts from the Golden Age of Path Whinery (post 9-11 to around 2010) should have been moderated and/or deleted.
This level of moderation is super chill folks.
To be honest, about 25% of my posts from the Golden Age of Path Whinery (post 9-11 to around 2010) should have been moderated and/or deleted.
This level of moderation is super chill folks.
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2007
- Messages
- 947
- Reaction score
- 627
The thread derailed mildy...no big deal. A lot of threads do. Don't ban guys like Thrombus and LADoc, it keeps the Path forum entertaining 
(I liked nrxxx too). And now, this thread will be shutdown in 3...2...1...
(I liked nrxxx too). And now, this thread will be shutdown in 3...2...1...
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2004
- Messages
- 7,132
- Reaction score
- 1,255
The thread derailed mildy...no big deal. A lot of threads do. Don't ban guys like Thrombus and LADoc, it keeps the Path forum entertaining
Honestly I dont care. Not to be super arrogant, but others benefit more from me than me from them (although I do get some interesting gems of gossip every blue moon).
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Messages
- 2,175
- Reaction score
- 1,068
What thread doesn't have some political commentary in it? There was nothing offensive on the Theranos thread. Whoever reported it needs to view this website with their emotional support peacock or something...
I guess the swingers thread was more in line with what they want posted here at SDN.....
I guess the swingers thread was more in line with what they want posted here at SDN.....
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2015
- Messages
- 418
- Reaction score
- 200
Don't knock it till you've tried it :>}
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2003
- Messages
- 28,059
- Reaction score
- 441
The thread derailed mildy...no big deal. A lot of threads do. Don't ban guys like Thrombus and LADoc, it keeps the Path forum entertaining
It got multiple complaints for being excessive and off topic. These were reports from established users, not anyone trying to silence "truth". Moderators typically only take action when there are complaints or there are obvious problematic issues (like offensive content, personal attacks, etc). NO ONE is trolling these forums looking for good opportunities to shut down honest and open discussion. I have no idea why some of you are turning yourselves into victims, but it doesn't play well here on this free website open to all who can talk about pretty much anything they want. And the conversation wasn't even shut down, it was suggested to be moved to another forum WITHIN THIS SAME WEBSITE.
Not exactly 1984 here, people. I think those complaining about the moderator action may also need their emotional support animals to get them through this.
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2009
- Messages
- 220
- Reaction score
- 14
No clues at all here about why some people can't find good jobs or are unhappy where they are now.. nope.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2003
- Messages
- 28,059
- Reaction score
- 441
LOL yes.
I feel like half of the people we reject from our job searches after phone interviews are the people who hang around here and consider themselves incredibly great pathologists.
