- Joined
- Dec 27, 2018
- Messages
- 188
- Reaction score
- 403
An update of the Wedgedawg tool can't come soon enough. Wow. 522?

It's this one. Already played out for colleges. Happening for med schools nextOr arms race.
Hopefully this years MSAR data is just so ridiculously high that it wards off a number of applicants and the overall application pool slips. Sure, top schools will get top-ier, but middle schools will get middle-ier too.Lol geez, 4.0/525 next yr boys
Do NOT underestimate the number of people who have the mindset of:Hopefully this years MSAR data is just so ridiculously high that it wards off a number of applicants and the overall application pool slips. Sure, top schools will get top-ier, but middle schools will get middle-ier too.
So actually, the average accepted stats were still something like 3.77/511- same as last year. I personally think admissions competitiveness has plateaued (there’s really no way for a median MCAT to go above 522-523 unless class sizes go down) and considering the number of new schools opening, overall med school admissions may actually get easier.Hopefully this years MSAR data is just so ridiculously high that it wards off a number of applicants and the overall application pool slips. Sure, top schools will get top-ier, but middle schools will get middle-ier too.
Penn too. I imagine that this is because more people, including more top students, are taking the MCAT, keeping the distribution normal and raising the raw number of high scorers, but the number of seats at top schools remain constant (or are decreasing).Hmm interestingly 90th percentile at Yale and WashU is 526
Nope, Bobby will now go to my school! Believe me, we'll take NYU's leavings.Makes you wonder, do you reckon the MCAT/GPA creep in the top schools will have a trickle down effect on the more average/low-tier schools?
Something like: Johnny who would've been competitive at NYU/Yale/WashU/etc. a few years ago gets pushed out by increasing competition/stats creep. Johnny decides to "settle" (for the lack of a better word) for a lower stat school. If there are enough Johnnys, then now Billy at that lower stat school gets pushed out, which then affects the Roberts at the schools statistically below, etc. Which means Borderline Bobby, who could've been a med student a few years back, now can't matriculate anywhere due to the top N% stat creep.
Y'all reckon this is likely?
Maybe there's some very macroscopic shift, but there are enough people with bad school lists such that I don't envision this chain reaction happening. I imagine that there are gonna be more people with mid-level stats who "fall through the cracks" and don't get an A due to overshooting their school list.Makes you wonder, do you reckon the MCAT/GPA creep in the top schools will have a trickle down effect on the more average/low-tier schools?
Something like: Johnny who would've been competitive at NYU/Yale/WashU/etc. a few years ago gets pushed out by increasing competition/stats creep. Johnny decides to "settle" (for the lack of a better word) for a lower stat school. If there are enough Johnnys, then now Billy at that lower stat school gets pushed out, which then affects the Roberts at the schools statistically below, etc. Which means Borderline Bobby, who could've been a med student a few years back, now can't matriculate anywhere due to the top N% stat creep.
Y'all reckon this is likely?
Back to what they were at before. Prior to the MCAT change, they had 90ths at the top 0.1-0.2% (40-41). During the score update the AAMC collapsed a lot of the high end scores to be only one value on the new test (e.g. a 13-15 Verbal were all in the top 1%, and now the top 1% all get 132). So these schools actually had a brief dip in their extremes but are right back to their old levels of absurdity.Hmm interestingly 90th percentile at Yale and WashU is 526
What is more surprising (to me) is the number of applicants who under-shoot and fail to get in.I imagine that there are gonna be more people with mid-level stats who "fall through the cracks" and don't get an A due to overshooting their school list.
Nope, Bobby will now go to my school! Believe me, we'll take NYU's leavings.
You forgot to add:Do NOT underestimate the number of people who have the mindset of:
"I'll apply for ****s and giggles"
"You miss all the shots you don't take"
"You never know"
"A guy/gal can dream"
"I fit their mission"
It's my dream school
All verbatim SDN quotes.
I was thinking more 3.4/508+But are Borderline Bobbys with low 3's GPA and below median MCAT considered NYU's leavings? I meant a trickle down effect of something like NYU -> Einstein -> ... -> "low tier"/unranked.
You forgot to add:
"My life experience will make up for everything else"
"Everyone says I'm competitive" (input from people who are not doctors nor have ever applied to med school)
"My adviser told me [fill in something ridiculous every adviser has said ever]"
That's the kind of pain I wouldn't wish on anyone, yikes...What is more surprising (to me) is the number of applicants who under-shoot and fail to get in.
I can provide yu my experience I am banking on: First 60 credits were a 3.4 average all taken in a military context, next 12 credits were a 3.1 average when I had a newborn, next 50 credits have been 4.0 all the sciences while working with familiy and millitary obligations still.What do you think the "life experiences" they refer to are like? Are they genuinely respectable experiences like "poor ugrad performance due to working 30 hours a week, dropped out to serve, and came back to finish strong with a 4.0", or just something like "I was not motivated freshman/w/e years, but I had an aha! moment and now I am, and now I wanna go to your school!"?
Shouldn’t that be next year? Since they announced it fairly early in the application season and a bunch of people probably sent in August apps (like me...)interested to see what NYU will look like in 2 yrs when the first class that applied knowing about free tuition is represented in the msar
Shouldn’t that be next year? Since they announced it fairly early in the application season and a bunch of people probably sent in August apps (like me...)
More like the latter.What do you think the "life experiences" they refer to are like? Are they genuinely respectable experiences like "poor ugrad performance due to working 30 hours a week, dropped out to serve, and came back to finish strong with a 4.0", or just something like "I was not motivated freshman/w/e years, but I had an aha! moment and now I am, and now I wanna go to your school!"?
I know someone who was a marine, had a 4.00 GPA, and a 515 MCAT. He only applied to two mid-tier schools because his wife just became a manager at her restaurant, so he had to stay nearby. So far he still hasn't heard back...super unfortunate.What is more surprising (to me) is the number of applicants who under-shoot and fail to get in.
Just goes to show even with phenomenal stats and a 'wow' factor, the process is just too random to bank on applying to only a few schools.I know someone who was a marine, had a 4.00 GPA, and a 515 MCAT. He only applied to two mid-tier schools because his wife just became a manager at her restaurant. So far he still hasn't heard back...super unfortunate.
Just goes to show even with phenomenal stats and a 'wow' factor, the process is just too random to bank on applying to only a few schools.
I'm pretty sure this is fairly common now. I have a 520 and 3.81 GPA in Biochem and didn't get any acceptances and only two interviews. I applied to like 20 schools too. Granted I need more clinical/non-clinical volunteer. But yeah, I'd like to emphasize that you can not rely on your stats to get you in anywhere no matter what MSAR says about their median scores.
Any waitlists?
Good luck.I did get one waitlist actually.
I will say too that both interviews were at oddball schools that seemed like they were looking for unique types of applicants. I'm pretty sure my personal statement and essays had more to do with their interest in me than my stats.
3.92 and 510I'd greatly appreciate anybody telling me the averages for University of South Dakota. My membership ran out yesterday (thought they updated on the same day each year so I waited a couple days to get the subscription assuming I could see the updated MSAR before losing it)
MCAT of 505 - 516I'd greatly appreciate anybody telling me the averages for University of South Dakota. My membership ran out yesterday (thought they updated on the same day each year so I waited a couple days to get the subscription assuming I could see the updated MSAR before losing it)
I think it's because there are more applicants with higher scores. Especially with people taking gap years, you essentially have up to 3 years of test takers applying per cycle, so more of those 1-2%ile applicants applying.Why do people think the average MCAT scores are getting so high for these schools? Are students just doing better on the MCAT, or are schools focusing more on stats than they were before?
Has to be the latter. MCAT scores are scaled/percentile based and the numbers of applicants haven't changed drastically in the last couple years. The actual number of 515+, 520+ etc scores has stayed roughly the same. It's just that admissions have been more and more disproportionately selecting for those candidates.Why do people think the average MCAT scores are getting so high for these schools? Are students just doing better on the MCAT, or are schools focusing more on stats than they were before?
That South Dakota Race and Ethnicity distribution though....I'd greatly appreciate anybody telling me the averages for University of South Dakota. My membership ran out yesterday (thought they updated on the same day each year so I waited a couple days to get the subscription assuming I could see the updated MSAR before losing it)
Back to what they were at before. Prior to the MCAT change, they had 90ths at the top 0.1-0.2% (40-41). During the score update the AAMC collapsed a lot of the high end scores to be only one value on the new test (e.g. a 13-15 Verbal were all in the top 1%, and now the top 1% all get 132). So these schools actually had a brief dip in their extremes but are right back to their old levels of absurdity.
That South Dakota Race and Ethnicity distribution though....
In my experience, probably 90% of questions I was able to answer by just crossing out 3 obviously wrong answers and move on. But to be fair you still have to resist making mental errors/miscalculations/misreading a question while sitting for 7 hours. Depending on the section, a 228/230 can already drop you to a 527It's also much easier now to not miss questions on the new MCAT. The emphasis on "critical reasoning" has allowed the vast majority of questions to be reasoned out with logic (with the exception of the psych section). You're less likely to get a random content question that's simply a dice roll of whether you remembered some factoid than before. I'm pretty sure a 528 is waaaaay easier to get than a 45 on the old scale.
Fictional?Like the adcoms were saying on my other post, an URM from SD is like a unicorn.![]()
Can anyone be a saint and provide the 25%, median, 75% MCAT and GPA for Hofstra? For acceptees and matriculants, please. I will give you a virtual hug.
In my experience, probably 90% of questions I was able to answer by just crossing out 3 obviously wrong answers and move on. But to be fair you still have to resist making mental errors/miscalculations/misreading a question while sitting for 7 hours. Depending on the section, a 228/230 can already drop you to a 527
Justice Department and Trump have sided with the repeal of the ACA as of this morning, so by the time entering Med Students now get out of residency, who knows the wild west landscape US healthcare will be in....I think averages will creep up until reimbursement drops, and then it will fall like a rock.
See also: Pharmacy.
Interestingly enough, the predictive validity for step 1 stayed exactly the same after switching to the new MCAT (mid 0.60s), and the USMLE just took down all the old practice NBMEs and replaced them with a few new ones, since the old ones had become invalid as predictors. Sounds like the powers that be have recognized that memorization of minutiae is a lot less important than mastery of principles and good reasoning/application skills. Bodes well for the future of medical students, in my opinion, because the current approach a lot of students use is straight-up rote memorizing 24,000 flashcards ("Zanki") which has always struck me as an absurd way to approach medical education.It's also much easier now to not miss questions on the new MCAT. The emphasis on "critical reasoning" has allowed the vast majority of questions to be reasoned out with logic (with the exception of the psych section). You're less likely to get a random content question that's simply a dice roll of whether you remembered some factoid than before. I'm pretty sure a 528 is waaaaay easier to get than a 45 on the old scale.