- Joined
- Oct 30, 2001
- Messages
- 44
- Reaction score
- 0
who's rekka? i'm jealous 😉
Originally posted by sar520:
•rondo,
yeah, i know! they should be talking about how hot their fellow applicants were. oh well. i guess they're just too polite.
rekka WAS pretty hot though. 🙂
-sarah•••
You guys and (gal) are pretty bad. Should I tell Rekha? 🙂
PS In case you don't know, I brought you to dinner at the firehouse.
Originally posted by SonicHedgehog:
•
MAPK, are you going to be at Hopkins on 13-14 Dec, interview dates? I'm gonna be there at that time. Maybe we can meet?
Also, Bernadine managed to hook me up with a former Stanford student at Hopkins, so I'm staying with him. I'm curious, what do you think about Cornell? I really liked their research, and I think in our field (signal-transduction), nobody can beat the quality of research between rockefeller and SKI... even my prof's tell me that it should be a sure choice. But I also really liked Wash.U and Yale.. It's getting really tough now.
•••
SONIC: I'm going to be at Hopkins on the 8th & 9th...I'm scheduled for a Tue/Wed b/c I wanted to visit UPenn (10th/11th) and Hopkins together. However, I'm going to cancel my UPenn interview, too.
The Cornell/Rock/Ski program is one of my top choices b/c I'm interested in taking a biochem/biophysical approach to studying signaling. Are you more of a developmental signaling guy (I'm guessing from your name...)? So the signaling research at SKI is great! and Rockefeller's biochemistry program is one of the best in the country. Cornell's grad program in biochem/structural biology also just got lots of $$$. On top of those reasons, I liked NYC. The surround environment seems safe and there's a lot to do there.
I haven't interviewed at WashU (got an offer from the MD but put "on hold" by MSTP) but I can tell that they have a large and well funded program. They also seem to treat their students very well. However, their biochemistry/biophysics isn't as attractive as UCSF, Stanford, MIT, Caltech, Harvard, Rockefeller, Hopkins, or Scripps.
MaPKiNKSTeR
P.S. BAYLOR: J/K about the "He/She" thing. And thanks for the email =)
Originally posted by sar520:
•
axlf1997 - which one are you?? you guys were all really cool though! i loved u chicago for many reasons but partly b/c of THE STUDENTS being the nicest friendliest people i met anywhere!
-s•••
Sat next to you at dinner. Sonic's friend and knew Dan and Katie. Glad you had a good time.
Originally posted by Original:
•
axlf1997:
Did I meet you when I interviewed at U of C? My name is Stephen and I was there with the first set of interviewees on Nov16. Anyhow you guys are awesome hosts! I had a really good time in Chicago; even better than I did at WashU despite all the money they spent 🙂 •••
Yeah, I was one of the first years that met with you in the morning from Stanford and went to eat lunch with you later in the DCAM.
Originally posted by SonicHedgehog:
•
MAP - I totally agree with you. I'll try to meet up with you during Cornell's 2nd look... I noticed you're from Cal. he he ... Give 'em the AXE. the AXE.. the AXE. In case you haven't guessed I'm from your rival school.•••
SoNiC-
Looking forward to meeting you...as long as you don't give me any crap about football (at least we got ONE win!). Just watch out for our basketball team... 😀
-MaPKiNKSTeR
Originally posted by MacGyver:
•I dont go by the rankings when selecting a program. The particular ranking of an MD/PhD program doesnt mean anything anyways. Research strenghts, graduate program reputation, and location are far more important.
Hopkins trumps Duke in my opinion for my field because its the #1 bioengineering program in the country, and the #1 hospital in America. Duke of course trumps Hopkins in other research areas. But I dont think the MD/PhD program ranking has very much relevance. Thats like ranking MD/MBA programs. The program ranking itself is not indicative of the quality of education, its just the NIH's opinion on how effectively the administrators at the institution run the program.•••
I couldn't agree more.
Originally posted by MacGyver:
•I dont go by the rankings when selecting a program. The particular ranking of an MD/PhD program doesnt mean anything anyways. Research strenghts, graduate program reputation, and location are far more important.
Hopkins trumps Duke in my opinion for my field because its the #1 bioengineering program in the country, and the #1 hospital in America. Duke of course trumps Hopkins in other research areas. But I dont think the MD/PhD program ranking has very much relevance. Thats like ranking MD/MBA programs. The program ranking itself is not indicative of the quality of education, its just the NIH's opinion on how effectively the administrators at the institution run the program.•••
However, by the same reasoning, whatever "ranking" indicates Hopkins as the #1 Bioengineering program in the country is meaningless as well. As far as I know, school X might have a better neuroregeneration or biodegradable prosthetics program than Hopkins; so anyone interested in these areas would have school X marked as #1 on their book; and we can iterate the analogy to the nth degree of specialization
😉 Hey I'm just messing with you. I totally agree with you that these rankings have very little meaning and are really just tools for propaganda. Hopkins is great! will you be going there?
Originally posted by chef:
•has anyone interviewed at U.Michigan MSTP? Can you share your impressions about the program? What are their strong fields? TIA•••
Hey Chef,
I was there two weeks ago. It seemed like a very good program. The director, Ron Koenig, was a really nice guy and seemed very interested in making sure that individual needs were met. The program seemed very flexible, which was nice. Michigan is gigantic and there are tons of faculty members in all kinds of fields. The impression I got was that whatever you wanted to do, there was someone there doing it. Not only that, but they're still expanding. They're building a gigantic new life sciences building with room for about 25 new faculty. I'm interested in transcription and gene control work, so there have been tons of people doing that everywhere I've interviewed. Beyond that, I don't know what their specific strong points are. The medical schools seems very standard. The first year is basic sciences and is pass/fail. The second year is organ based and is graded I think.
I'd be happy to answer any specific questions, but it's definitely worth checking out.
Good luck,
Adam