I posted this in another forum, but thought this was a more appropriate place. Is anyone recieving much feedback from programs that they interview at?
I went on an interview last week and the program director told me that there are strict rules of the Match. And just because I don't hear back from her, doesn't mean that she is not interested.
Agreed. Programs are not allowed to tip their hands as to how they will rank. They can be hit with serious penalties if they do so. So I'd be less surprised about not getting feedback than by getting it.
True - either side can voluntarily reveal information about ranking. It just can't be done with any tacit agreements or coercion. A program can tell you, "You are ranked to match, we really want you to come here." But the program can't ask you for your response to that statement and they can't say, "We would rank you to match if you really want to come here," and they also can't ask where you are ranking them. I suppose they could ask what you think of their program, in a general sense.
Some programs use this as a way to justify not communicating with any applicants.
I don't understand how a program can tell you they will be ranking you highly this early in the interview season when they haven't even met half of their applicants ?
I was straight up asked at my first interview if that program was my number 1 choice. I tactfully said: "Um, you're my first interview."
All I'm saying is don't expect ethical programs to go down this road. Not receiving feedback in terms of ranking is supposed to be the norm.
If you had a tape recorder, that interviewer could have gotten this program thrown out of the match for the next 3 years. That is blatantly against the rules.
Programs can tell you where you're ranked, if they want. You can tell them where you ranked them, if you want.Some med schools tell students this would be a violation. It's also on shaky ground if you read the NRMP rules literally, because neither party is permitted to ask for or make guarantees to the other, and no statements between the parties in terms of rank are permitted to be binding. And at the same time the rules require programs to be honest in all communications with the applicant. So it's not really possible to communicate about ranking with an applicant and not run afoul of one of these rules -- a program really cannot tell you they are ranking you to match, because if this is a guarantee it's a violation, and if it's nonbinding and they change their mind, it is arguably dishonest and a violation.
All I'm saying is don't expect ethical programs to go down this road. Not receiving feedback in terms of ranking is supposed to be the norm.